Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: At Least Four People Killed in Shooting at Kansas Factory, Police Said [View all]passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)90. Please show me where the anti gun supporters have ever gotten everything
I've not seen it.
After the compromise, when BOTH sides got something.
This is what I mean when I say you and I have a different opinion on compromise. The gun control people basically got nothing from this bill. It was not a compromise, it was a give-away.
What are you ideas for 'effective' gun control laws, and what are you willing to give up in a compromise to get them?
Not giving up lives is my biggest line in the sand.
Effective gun control laws would be making it harder for people to get a gun, like licensing and registration, having to pass background checks on all gun purchases. Also requirements that guns are stored safely, and insurance to make sure if your gun is used to kill someone there is insurance to cover the damages.
Owning guns should not be considered a constitutional right any more than anything else that people own. If you want to own something as potentially dangerous as a gun, you need to have a good reason to own one and be able to pass all obstacles to owning one. People are free to own cars now, but are not legal to drive them in public withoiut license and registration. Good reasons for owning a gun would be livestock protection, hunting, etc. Guns are just too dangerous to be owned for "sport" alone, unless you are into competition target practice, in which case, you could get a special license to own a gun for that purpose.
They are not safe even when purchased as self-protection, as in the end they kill more in the households who buy them for self-protection, than they protect. So, owning a gun for self-protection should only be available to certain people who "qualify" for that necessity.
Certain kinds of guns that make killing other humans easier (especially mass killings) have no place in our society today, other than in the military or on the police forces (and even then they should be limited to squads designed to tackle domestic violence and terrorism). I'd seriously like to see our community policing go sans-guns, but of course that will never happen when we have so many gun owners in the US.
What I'm willing to give up in exchange for this, is the idea of taking all guns away. Many people want to do that, and while I don't think it has a chance of hell in the US, I can certainly see why gun owners are frightened by the possibility laws could be passed to do that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
At Least Four People Killed in Shooting at Kansas Factory, Police Said [View all]
tabasco
Feb 2016
OP
If we will just keep cutting social services - shrinking government - all this...
SoLeftIAmRight
Feb 2016
#1
And your reasonable approach should be rewarded by us anti gun folks, not attacked.
randys1
Feb 2016
#53
I have an AR-10 chambered in .308 for deer hunting, and I can convert it to .223 by changing the
GGJohn
Feb 2016
#57
Neither you nor society are harmed by someone *legally* carrying a gun in your vicinity. Period.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2016
#88
Me and my society are harmed by people legally carring guns who still should not have one every day.
Cavallo
Mar 2016
#92
My good friend Kim Layfield died in the Racer Cafe Shooting in Seattle 3 years ago.
Cavallo
Mar 2016
#101
Your opinion is no more valid than those of Suzanna Hupp or John D. Green's:
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2016
#102
No more and no less weird than glamorized swimsuits photo spreads issues in a sports magazine
LanternWaste
Feb 2016
#35
Why the dodge? It's the obvious question resulting from you apparent assertion...
Marengo
Feb 2016
#61
Which means you DO have a problem with some guns. That's a deal breaker.
passiveporcupine
Mar 2016
#82
Please show me where the anti gun supporters have ever gotten everything
passiveporcupine
Mar 2016
#90
there is really no point in continuing this because on this one issue we disagree
passiveporcupine
Mar 2016
#95
Look how long it took for the anti-cig thinking to take hold. This too will take hold.
riversedge
Feb 2016
#27