Latest Breaking News

7962

(11,841 posts)

57. Haaaaaaaaa! yet true.....

Reply to shawn703 (Reply #42)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:24 PM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

100 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI Reveals New Details About Its Probe Into Hillary Clinton's Use of Private Email Server [View all] think Mar 2016 OP

So they are looking for the sourse emails of the Classified information FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #1

This may explain why NBC is giving Bernie more coverage awake Mar 2016 #2

That is what I thought last night Samantha Mar 2016 #8

Trump, as President, will also need to work with Congress Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #27

Trump's foreign policy does not need congress awake Mar 2016 #28

Even there, he needs congressional cooperation Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #33

Trump is unstable and would have unfettered access to lunching nuclear weapons awake Mar 2016 #37

I think you are amking my point, awake Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #46

To his supporters, since he SAYS it, it SHALL be done. 7962 Mar 2016 #52

Trump will tell Mexico to pay for wall Iwasapoorgirl Mar 2016 #65

He could do that, but it sounds quite inefficient Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #67

Ask Richard Nixon how stopping all crossings from Mexico went for him. Hint: Major disaster. marble falls Mar 2016 #69

Trump will be impeached elljay Mar 2016 #32

Possible, but don't hold your breath Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #36

This message was self-deleted by its author DUbeornot2be Mar 2016 #41

I expect them to try elljay Mar 2016 #50

It could happen karynnj Mar 2016 #61

He may have been a criminal elljay Mar 2016 #51

I hope you are correct but depending on just exactly how jwirr Mar 2016 #45

Trump will announce that he has chosen himself as VP, 7962 Mar 2016 #53

He may be the only person great enough to work with him! elljay Mar 2016 #59

Plan C Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #3

Yes, a Socialist Democrat has been schooling us on what a Democcrat libdem4life Mar 2016 #5

he only looks extreme to some because all we've had is selling out and third way republican lite roguevalley Mar 2016 #10

You are 100% correct in your observations. We have been already been Democratic Socialist for silvershadow Mar 2016 #13

Bingo! SHRED Mar 2016 #24

This is all very Sillary. eom vkkv Mar 2016 #4

Misspelling names SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #43

Anybody can make up LiberalElite Mar 2016 #48

Isnt it amazing? 7962 Mar 2016 #54

Not at all what I meant SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #60

Well, its certainly plentiful here as well, depending on the subject! nt 7962 Mar 2016 #63

I thought it was funny GummyBearz Mar 2016 #70

Several weeks ago SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #83

SCantiGOP wrote "I even avoid first names for the two candidates..." vkkv Mar 2016 #84

Free Republic... I am nothing close to being a right-winger. I also live in one of the most vkkv Mar 2016 #80

Drip...drip...drip... SoapBox Mar 2016 #6

... lamp_shade Mar 2016 #7

maybe you should. roguevalley Mar 2016 #11

I like your emoticon! ejbr Mar 2016 #26

Of course they're not going to produce the material. And it's not news that pnwmom Mar 2016 #9

+1 - there is absolutely no "detail" in this ridiculous "story." spooky3 Mar 2016 #38

This is much different than other republican inspired attacks on the Clintons. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #76

Sigh. Another Sanders supporter trying to dictate spooky3 Mar 2016 #77

Since when did the FBI get their marching papers from the RW? Absurd. libdem4life Mar 2016 #81

As you know, I said nothing of the sort. And your fellow commenter spooky3 Mar 2016 #86

The "email issue" is evolving quickly. Sanders doesn't want to fight HRC libdem4life Mar 2016 #91

What an assinine comment. Typical whining from the Hillary crowd. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #82

You said: "You can't brush this off as another right wing smear." spooky3 Mar 2016 #85

Whine, whine, whine. Boo hoo someone said something bad about Hillary. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #89

Your Big Mistake: "I merely pointed out the facts..." libdem4life Mar 2016 #92

and for those of you who didn't click the link - further in ... floppyboo Mar 2016 #12

To answer your question, no she hasn't changed position on that statement. Sunlei Mar 2016 #22

From what I've read, she says they weren't classified until after they had passed her system. OnlinePoker Mar 2016 #23

The LAW states that you know if info should be considered sensitive, 7962 Mar 2016 #55

What? OnlinePoker Mar 2016 #62

Its very good wording by her. Taken right out of Bill's playbook... GummyBearz Mar 2016 #71

Oh, come on - are you in need of a bridge? Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #74

I find her completely at fault in this. OnlinePoker Mar 2016 #78

My mistake, sorry! Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #79

She conducted the business of the SOS for many years and jwirr Mar 2016 #47

Never looked at it that way. Good point. nt 7962 Mar 2016 #56

WaPo published an article that said she sent 104 emails with classified information Yo_Mama Mar 2016 #75

ViceDot Com,,,,,, geeez Cryptoad Mar 2016 #14

maybe you missed the quotes around the FBI statement, or should they get off this site too? floppyboo Mar 2016 #15

and speaking of sources floppyboo Mar 2016 #16

As a history buff, and theology as well, this is So True. n/t libdem4life Mar 2016 #93

Funny the only document cited is Cryptoad Mar 2016 #19

RW 'media' always tries lawsuits to create tabloid-clicks and political trash. Sunlei Mar 2016 #21

Vice is RWNJs? Please explain navarth Mar 2016 #25

Socialistworker.org would be considered a right-wing news site shawn703 Mar 2016 #42

Haaaaaaaaa! yet true..... 7962 Mar 2016 #57

That poster certainly would seem disingenuous at best navarth Mar 2016 #66

Vice.com is NOT right wing! nt tblue37 Mar 2016 #31

"It's Increasingly Clear Facts Don't Matter in the Republican Presidential Primary" think Mar 2016 #35

Vice.com is right-wing? You couldn't possibly be more wrong. truebrit71 Mar 2016 #40

I lol'd GummyBearz Mar 2016 #72

VICE happens to be one of the last real news organizations with real journalists... snooper2 Mar 2016 #73

Someone just got soundly educated...the poster, and me. libdem4life Mar 2016 #95

"The FBI has asked US District Court Judge Randolph Moss to dismiss VICE News' FOIA lawsuit" Sunlei Mar 2016 #17

the money quote grasswire Mar 2016 #18

!!!!! riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #44

Just came across this article other day from former Homeland Security staffer & law professor Hawaii Hiker Mar 2016 #20

Unfortunately, not many here care about the truth. Hoyt Mar 2016 #29

Sadly you're correct....ABC Legal Analyst Dam Abrams Hawaii Hiker Mar 2016 #34

Well, he says its not clear that an email could be considered a "document", 7962 Mar 2016 #58

Thank you for this excellent and thorough analysis. pnwmom Mar 2016 #39

Very Good Link itcfish Mar 2016 #96

tons of comments following that article. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #30

And there's this from the LA Times Hawaii Hiker Mar 2016 #49

Thank you. spooky3 Mar 2016 #87

She BCC'd Vlad Putin everything. Darb Mar 2016 #64

A bit ominous for Hillary. Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #68

Chris Cilizza (WaPo and criticized as being biased against Clinton in the past) said spooky3 Mar 2016 #88

I think the bigger problem is for her aides madville Mar 2016 #90

What I'm wondering is if Pagliani got/presumably asked for immunity, libdem4life Mar 2016 #97

They are usually reluctant to offer immunity madville Mar 2016 #99

One would think so, but word is she's going to let them take the fall libdem4life Mar 2016 #100

OMG itcfish Mar 2016 #94

I don't recall any blanket denial. Else why would they have 150 agents libdem4life Mar 2016 #98