Latest Breaking News

katsy

(4,246 posts)

92. then why even go there.

Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:46 AM

Apr 2016

http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/hillary-clinton-late-term-abortions

Read the last 2 paragraphs above.

Why pander? Why not just come out and say no further restrictions?

Roe is the law of the land. No further act of Congress necessary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

166 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New poll: Female voters flock to Bernie Sanders from Hillary Clinton [View all] Bubzer Apr 2016 OP

Hillary wants to compromise on abortion Lunabell Apr 2016 #1

Damn right! A woman's body is her own, full stop!!! Bubzer Apr 2016 #2

oh, yeah. That must be why she has NARAL's enthusiastic endorsement. pnwmom Apr 2016 #3

Then explain this quote from Hillary: Lunabell Apr 2016 #12

This was referring to late term abortions -- ie., when the fetus is viable outside the womb -- pnwmom Apr 2016 #36

Another case of "it's okay when a Clinton does it" Scootaloo Apr 2016 #57

Do you ever make any sense about anything? This isn't an example. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #58

I'm not sure why you're so easily confused. Scootaloo Apr 2016 #59

Your confusion is you don't understand this basic FACT: both Hillary and Bernie support Roe v. Wade. pnwmom Apr 2016 #69

This has nothing to do with Roe v. Wade. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #82

No, she is NOT. She's talking about the same thing Bernie supports: pnwmom Apr 2016 #83

All I know is what she says. And I don't think Bernie has put the right to choose on the table. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #103

You survived an alert 0-7 Hekate Apr 2016 #118

No, it was about Roe. V. Wade. Here's the transcript: muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #122

Thank you for making my point. You can make whatever excuse you want A Simple Game Apr 2016 #129

Roe v. Wade allows restrictions on abortions muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #131

My point is that she would support exceptions to choice and she says so in her own words. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #134

Yup yup... you nailed it! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2016 #85

A uterus doesn't belong on the pages of the katsy Apr 2016 #78

Both Bernie and Hillary support Roe v. Wade. pnwmom Apr 2016 #79

Yes Roe rests on the principles set forth in the katsy Apr 2016 #80

Roe v. Wade allows restrictions once the fetus is VIABLE. Bernie supports Roe v. Wade. pnwmom Apr 2016 #81

You keep repeating the same thing over & over. katsy Apr 2016 #84

I don't think we need a change in the Constitution and neither does Hillary or Bernie. pnwmom Apr 2016 #87

Did I suddenly become famous and say this? katsy Apr 2016 #88

Here is where reading comprehension skills would come in handy. pnwmom Apr 2016 #90

then why even go there. katsy Apr 2016 #92

She went there because the question took her there. It asked her to discuss late-term abortions, pnwmom Apr 2016 #95

See I don't want an act of congress deciding katsy Apr 2016 #101

Then you and Bernie don't share the same position. He fully supports Roe v. Wade and you don't. pnwmom Apr 2016 #102

I don't not define myself by the candidates I support. katsy Apr 2016 #104

Roe v. Wade IS the law -- for non-viable fetuses. pnwmom Apr 2016 #106

Good. No further act of congress necessary. katsy Apr 2016 #107

The issue is VIABLE fetuses. And Bernie and Hillary both understand that Roe v. Wade pnwmom Apr 2016 #108

So do you & I katsy Apr 2016 #109

Btw.... This is another terry shiavo maneuver. katsy Apr 2016 #111

Wait, I can answer that one, pnwmom! rock Apr 2016 #98

Sometimes it seems so. pnwmom Apr 2016 #99

Wow your world is one dimensional. katsy Apr 2016 #105

+1 Duval Apr 2016 #133

And, your point? It is still something she's offered up noiretextatique Apr 2016 #119

Wrong. It's Sanders who is the Pope's fanboy, literally. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #6

Did you know female voters are flocking to Bernie Sanders from Hillary Clinton? Bubzer Apr 2016 #11

I knew about that Fox poll if that is what you mean. It is 2-day-old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #35

Conflating the Boston Herald article as being a fox news article will never make it true. Bubzer Apr 2016 #39

I didn't conflate the two, as I said re your OP, it is a Fox poll. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #67

This might come as somthing of a shock, but most news organizations report released polls. Bubzer Apr 2016 #110

Fox Snooze AND sheshe2 Apr 2016 #150

Comming from a hillarian, that means less than nothing. Bubzer Apr 2016 #160

Not according to any other poll. It's an outlier. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #54

Hillary will give away the right to chose if it is politically expedient for her Lunabell Apr 2016 #13

+1 Bubzer Apr 2016 #23

As well as... ReRe Apr 2016 #31

That's why Planned Parenthood Action endorsed her Beaverhausen Apr 2016 #34

The CEO of PP kiddo works for the Clinton campaign pinebox Apr 2016 #91

she said if there's rules for rape and death, she's good with limits on it. read the interview in roguevalley Apr 2016 #33

Do you hear Donna Brazille on CNN question why Hillary brought that up? She said the reason why jillan Apr 2016 #65

The debates hit a lot of topics Dems agree on; the issue is what are the candidate's priorities. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #66

What garbage. Bubzer Apr 2016 #114

Socialism and women's rights are not "intertwined." SunSeeker Apr 2016 #117

"Socialism and women's rights are not "intertwined."" According to who? You? Bubzer Apr 2016 #121

According to reality. The European democracies don't have socialist economies. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #125

Of COURSE it's not socialism. It's DEMOCRATIC socialism. I'd say nice try...but it really wasn't. Bubzer Apr 2016 #130

No, it is not Democratic Socialism. It is simply well-functioning democracy. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #132

According to who? You? We've been down this road before. Here, let me spell this out for you... Bubzer Apr 2016 #143

Thank you for finally looking up the definition of Democratic Socialism. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #148

Hear that? It's the bullshit alarm going off...nope... not letting deflect or change the subject. Bubzer Apr 2016 #149

The Danish prime minister emphatically states they do not have Democratic Socialism. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #154

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #162

There are 1.2 billion Catholics in the world. azmom Apr 2016 #140

Jane is Catholic. And Bernie Sanders acts like a Pope Francis fanboy. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #144

#WhichHillary? Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #136

I've always thought this was such an easy issue to resolve Fairgo Apr 2016 #28

This old man agrees with you madokie Apr 2016 #153

I've always wanted a republican to tell me whether I could or couldn't get a vasectomy. Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #164

This should be in the Primaries forum Democat Apr 2016 #4

Nope. It's LBN. Bubzer Apr 2016 #5

It's a Hillary hit piece/analysis by a right wing rag. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #7

"Other articles"? I dont care about "Other articles". Nothing presented in this article is untrue. Bubzer Apr 2016 #8

It's a right wing rag's analysis of a two-day-old poll. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #19

I reject your notion that the Boston Herald is a right-wing rag. Bubzer Apr 2016 #22

I reject your notion that it is NOT a RW rag. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #151

Oh look, another opinion. I'll be sure to place that next to all the other hillarian opinions... Bubzer Apr 2016 #155

Since when is reporting polls an "opinion piece".. sheesh... vkkv Apr 2016 #10

It is analyzing a two-day-old poll. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #18

Info that was analyzed and published days later, yes? We call your comment vkkv Apr 2016 #20

No, "clutching at straws" is resorting to right wing rags to prop up your candidate. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #30

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate... # 2 Bubzer Apr 2016 #44

It's a poll, I'm sure you can handle it pinebox Apr 2016 #93

Analysis requires extrapolation. That's not happening here. The article was posted TODAY... thanks. Bubzer Apr 2016 #21

The article was posted today, but it is talking about two day old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #27

So you claim. Doesn't matter how many times you repeat it, you wont become more right about it. Bubzer Apr 2016 #43

Sorry..the Boston Herald is reporting it as news on Sat. April 16th.. vkkv Apr 2016 #24

That is because it is a right wing rag that likes to beat up on Clinton with old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #26

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate. Bubzer Apr 2016 #41

It does not belong in LBN because it is old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #45

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate #4 Bubzer Apr 2016 #50

any media outlet that reports something unfavorable to Her Excellency is greymouse Apr 2016 #63

This ^^^^^ libdem4life Apr 2016 #96

It is a national poll, and it means zilch. They can blow it up all they want, but the facts are still_one Apr 2016 #61

Even before a single state voted I used this exact argument. I, and many others Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #74

And terribly sad... it reveals a very strong double standard. Not very democratic. Bubzer Apr 2016 #113

It doesn't represent the true situation. States determine the nominee, and who will be still_one Apr 2016 #127

I am not reversing anything. What someone else says is their view not mine. I have never still_one Apr 2016 #126

It's from Fox News and says "dominating a brawling Brooklyn debate" Democat Apr 2016 #9

"It's not news" Why? Because you say so? Bubzer Apr 2016 #15

Because he is part of the Hillary mafia. Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #165

Please, clearly explain your definition of "trolls" ? vkkv Apr 2016 #16

Thank you. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #37

This is not LBN and should not be on the front page. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #14

Wrong. It's the BOSTON HERALD... that wrote the article...your reading comprehension is failing you. Bubzer Apr 2016 #17

Oh good God. The Herald is the Republican paper in Boston. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #25

Ok Sunseek, you just suggested that Fox News was legitimate, but the right Boston Herald is not. vkkv Apr 2016 #29

No I did not say Fox News was legitimate, I said that Fox poll was widely reported, so not LBN. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #40

Your initial complaint was that it is not news, your de-legitimizing of the Herald came after vkkv Apr 2016 #46

It isn't LBN. It's analyzing a 2-day-old poll. Analysis is not news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #47

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate #3 Bubzer Apr 2016 #49

Wrong. It is indeed a RW rag. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #152

According to you. I'm sure you're non biased about it... the way hillary is honest and forthright. Bubzer Apr 2016 #156

You are a Massite? sheshe2 Apr 2016 #157

Are you Brock? Bubzer Apr 2016 #158

Lol~ sheshe2 Apr 2016 #159

Do you know who Brock is? Bubzer Apr 2016 #161

Oh please. I can find plenty of articles that show the Globe is conservative... Bubzer Apr 2016 #32

I said the Globe was liberal compared to the Herald. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #42

ROTFL. So now its a "By comparison" thing? Stop being disingenous. Bubzer Apr 2016 #48

I am not the one being disingenuous here. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #51

Yes you are. So long. Bubzer Apr 2016 #52

OFFS Marrah_G Apr 2016 #72

You know the Herald is a conservative paper, right? Marrah_G Apr 2016 #71

According to who? You? Bubzer Apr 2016 #115

according to anyone with the faintest awareness of national media. kwassa Apr 2016 #135

I now think he is being intentionally dense. Marrah_G Apr 2016 #138

Nope... just not taking the word of somone supporting a consumate liar and cheater. Bubzer Apr 2016 #147

It's not intentional. kwassa Apr 2016 #163

Ahhh... you too eh? Well I'll happily repeat my response for you as well: Bubzer Apr 2016 #146

According to anyone who lives here Marrah_G Apr 2016 #137

Ahh...so, then not you. Thanks for that clarification. Here's a hint; You're not an authority... Bubzer Apr 2016 #141

You do not want to know the truth Marrah_G Apr 2016 #142

So says somone supporting a consumate liar and cheater. Bubzer Apr 2016 #145

Kick and R BeanMusical Apr 2016 #38

Last month? RandySF Apr 2016 #53

Which candidate is likeable? Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #55

Imagine that. crim son Apr 2016 #56

I never flocked. yuiyoshida Apr 2016 #60

That's cause you're awesome yuiyoshida! Bubzer Apr 2016 #116

Thank You...a song for you! yuiyoshida Apr 2016 #120

Awesome! Bubzer Apr 2016 #123

one more!! yuiyoshida Apr 2016 #124

The current percentages Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #62

I guess women don't like corporate gigolos. mhatrw Apr 2016 #64

In short: Hillary is toast! Helen Borg Apr 2016 #68

It's a "Fox News Channel poll" published in a RW rag. I would love for the poll to be accurate but pampango Apr 2016 #70

Clintons and Scientology Scharlui Apr 2016 #73

It's news to me here in the USA nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #75

Nooooooooo---I don't even want to click on it. I don't care for her but she's not THAT stupid. zazen Apr 2016 #76

ok, so that sounds like a Scientologist donor got her to do an unethical favor zazen Apr 2016 #77

You need to post this in GD-P. pinebox Apr 2016 #94

Yes, they NEED to! ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #166

fox poll, everyone knows fox is an arm of the republican party..so agenda is always anti-clinton. Sunlei Apr 2016 #86

"...in a Fox News Channel poll..." apnu Apr 2016 #89

Thanks for the article beastie boy Apr 2016 #97

Keep playing that woman card, Hill! CharlotteVale Apr 2016 #100

LOL, Republican rag paper. wisteria Apr 2016 #112

Beware female defectors... MattSh Apr 2016 #128

She's a heartless mean spirited person Baobab Apr 2016 #139