Latest Breaking News

sheshe2

(95,834 posts)

157. You are a Massite?

Reply to Bubzer (Reply #156)

Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:36 PM

Apr 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

166 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New poll: Female voters flock to Bernie Sanders from Hillary Clinton [View all] Bubzer Apr 2016 OP

Hillary wants to compromise on abortion Lunabell Apr 2016 #1

Damn right! A woman's body is her own, full stop!!! Bubzer Apr 2016 #2

oh, yeah. That must be why she has NARAL's enthusiastic endorsement. pnwmom Apr 2016 #3

Then explain this quote from Hillary: Lunabell Apr 2016 #12

This was referring to late term abortions -- ie., when the fetus is viable outside the womb -- pnwmom Apr 2016 #36

Another case of "it's okay when a Clinton does it" Scootaloo Apr 2016 #57

Do you ever make any sense about anything? This isn't an example. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #58

I'm not sure why you're so easily confused. Scootaloo Apr 2016 #59

Your confusion is you don't understand this basic FACT: both Hillary and Bernie support Roe v. Wade. pnwmom Apr 2016 #69

This has nothing to do with Roe v. Wade. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #82

No, she is NOT. She's talking about the same thing Bernie supports: pnwmom Apr 2016 #83

All I know is what she says. And I don't think Bernie has put the right to choose on the table. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #103

You survived an alert 0-7 Hekate Apr 2016 #118

No, it was about Roe. V. Wade. Here's the transcript: muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #122

Thank you for making my point. You can make whatever excuse you want A Simple Game Apr 2016 #129

Roe v. Wade allows restrictions on abortions muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #131

My point is that she would support exceptions to choice and she says so in her own words. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #134

Yup yup... you nailed it! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2016 #85

A uterus doesn't belong on the pages of the katsy Apr 2016 #78

Both Bernie and Hillary support Roe v. Wade. pnwmom Apr 2016 #79

Yes Roe rests on the principles set forth in the katsy Apr 2016 #80

Roe v. Wade allows restrictions once the fetus is VIABLE. Bernie supports Roe v. Wade. pnwmom Apr 2016 #81

You keep repeating the same thing over & over. katsy Apr 2016 #84

I don't think we need a change in the Constitution and neither does Hillary or Bernie. pnwmom Apr 2016 #87

Did I suddenly become famous and say this? katsy Apr 2016 #88

Here is where reading comprehension skills would come in handy. pnwmom Apr 2016 #90

then why even go there. katsy Apr 2016 #92

She went there because the question took her there. It asked her to discuss late-term abortions, pnwmom Apr 2016 #95

See I don't want an act of congress deciding katsy Apr 2016 #101

Then you and Bernie don't share the same position. He fully supports Roe v. Wade and you don't. pnwmom Apr 2016 #102

I don't not define myself by the candidates I support. katsy Apr 2016 #104

Roe v. Wade IS the law -- for non-viable fetuses. pnwmom Apr 2016 #106

Good. No further act of congress necessary. katsy Apr 2016 #107

The issue is VIABLE fetuses. And Bernie and Hillary both understand that Roe v. Wade pnwmom Apr 2016 #108

So do you & I katsy Apr 2016 #109

Btw.... This is another terry shiavo maneuver. katsy Apr 2016 #111

Wait, I can answer that one, pnwmom! rock Apr 2016 #98

Sometimes it seems so. pnwmom Apr 2016 #99

Wow your world is one dimensional. katsy Apr 2016 #105

+1 Duval Apr 2016 #133

And, your point? It is still something she's offered up noiretextatique Apr 2016 #119

Wrong. It's Sanders who is the Pope's fanboy, literally. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #6

Did you know female voters are flocking to Bernie Sanders from Hillary Clinton? Bubzer Apr 2016 #11

I knew about that Fox poll if that is what you mean. It is 2-day-old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #35

Conflating the Boston Herald article as being a fox news article will never make it true. Bubzer Apr 2016 #39

I didn't conflate the two, as I said re your OP, it is a Fox poll. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #67

This might come as somthing of a shock, but most news organizations report released polls. Bubzer Apr 2016 #110

Fox Snooze AND sheshe2 Apr 2016 #150

Comming from a hillarian, that means less than nothing. Bubzer Apr 2016 #160

Not according to any other poll. It's an outlier. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #54

Hillary will give away the right to chose if it is politically expedient for her Lunabell Apr 2016 #13

+1 Bubzer Apr 2016 #23

As well as... ReRe Apr 2016 #31

That's why Planned Parenthood Action endorsed her Beaverhausen Apr 2016 #34

The CEO of PP kiddo works for the Clinton campaign pinebox Apr 2016 #91

she said if there's rules for rape and death, she's good with limits on it. read the interview in roguevalley Apr 2016 #33

Do you hear Donna Brazille on CNN question why Hillary brought that up? She said the reason why jillan Apr 2016 #65

The debates hit a lot of topics Dems agree on; the issue is what are the candidate's priorities. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #66

What garbage. Bubzer Apr 2016 #114

Socialism and women's rights are not "intertwined." SunSeeker Apr 2016 #117

"Socialism and women's rights are not "intertwined."" According to who? You? Bubzer Apr 2016 #121

According to reality. The European democracies don't have socialist economies. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #125

Of COURSE it's not socialism. It's DEMOCRATIC socialism. I'd say nice try...but it really wasn't. Bubzer Apr 2016 #130

No, it is not Democratic Socialism. It is simply well-functioning democracy. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #132

According to who? You? We've been down this road before. Here, let me spell this out for you... Bubzer Apr 2016 #143

Thank you for finally looking up the definition of Democratic Socialism. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #148

Hear that? It's the bullshit alarm going off...nope... not letting deflect or change the subject. Bubzer Apr 2016 #149

The Danish prime minister emphatically states they do not have Democratic Socialism. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #154

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #162

There are 1.2 billion Catholics in the world. azmom Apr 2016 #140

Jane is Catholic. And Bernie Sanders acts like a Pope Francis fanboy. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #144

#WhichHillary? Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #136

I've always thought this was such an easy issue to resolve Fairgo Apr 2016 #28

This old man agrees with you madokie Apr 2016 #153

I've always wanted a republican to tell me whether I could or couldn't get a vasectomy. Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #164

This should be in the Primaries forum Democat Apr 2016 #4

Nope. It's LBN. Bubzer Apr 2016 #5

It's a Hillary hit piece/analysis by a right wing rag. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #7

"Other articles"? I dont care about "Other articles". Nothing presented in this article is untrue. Bubzer Apr 2016 #8

It's a right wing rag's analysis of a two-day-old poll. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #19

I reject your notion that the Boston Herald is a right-wing rag. Bubzer Apr 2016 #22

I reject your notion that it is NOT a RW rag. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #151

Oh look, another opinion. I'll be sure to place that next to all the other hillarian opinions... Bubzer Apr 2016 #155

Since when is reporting polls an "opinion piece".. sheesh... vkkv Apr 2016 #10

It is analyzing a two-day-old poll. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #18

Info that was analyzed and published days later, yes? We call your comment vkkv Apr 2016 #20

No, "clutching at straws" is resorting to right wing rags to prop up your candidate. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #30

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate... # 2 Bubzer Apr 2016 #44

It's a poll, I'm sure you can handle it pinebox Apr 2016 #93

Analysis requires extrapolation. That's not happening here. The article was posted TODAY... thanks. Bubzer Apr 2016 #21

The article was posted today, but it is talking about two day old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #27

So you claim. Doesn't matter how many times you repeat it, you wont become more right about it. Bubzer Apr 2016 #43

Sorry..the Boston Herald is reporting it as news on Sat. April 16th.. vkkv Apr 2016 #24

That is because it is a right wing rag that likes to beat up on Clinton with old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #26

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate. Bubzer Apr 2016 #41

It does not belong in LBN because it is old news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #45

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate #4 Bubzer Apr 2016 #50

any media outlet that reports something unfavorable to Her Excellency is greymouse Apr 2016 #63

This ^^^^^ libdem4life Apr 2016 #96

It is a national poll, and it means zilch. They can blow it up all they want, but the facts are still_one Apr 2016 #61

Even before a single state voted I used this exact argument. I, and many others Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #74

And terribly sad... it reveals a very strong double standard. Not very democratic. Bubzer Apr 2016 #113

It doesn't represent the true situation. States determine the nominee, and who will be still_one Apr 2016 #127

I am not reversing anything. What someone else says is their view not mine. I have never still_one Apr 2016 #126

It's from Fox News and says "dominating a brawling Brooklyn debate" Democat Apr 2016 #9

"It's not news" Why? Because you say so? Bubzer Apr 2016 #15

Because he is part of the Hillary mafia. Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #165

Please, clearly explain your definition of "trolls" ? vkkv Apr 2016 #16

Thank you. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #37

This is not LBN and should not be on the front page. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #14

Wrong. It's the BOSTON HERALD... that wrote the article...your reading comprehension is failing you. Bubzer Apr 2016 #17

Oh good God. The Herald is the Republican paper in Boston. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #25

Ok Sunseek, you just suggested that Fox News was legitimate, but the right Boston Herald is not. vkkv Apr 2016 #29

No I did not say Fox News was legitimate, I said that Fox poll was widely reported, so not LBN. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #40

Your initial complaint was that it is not news, your de-legitimizing of the Herald came after vkkv Apr 2016 #46

It isn't LBN. It's analyzing a 2-day-old poll. Analysis is not news. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #47

Synopsis of your comment; It's a right wing rag cause it attacks my candidate #3 Bubzer Apr 2016 #49

Wrong. It is indeed a RW rag. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #152

According to you. I'm sure you're non biased about it... the way hillary is honest and forthright. Bubzer Apr 2016 #156

You are a Massite? sheshe2 Apr 2016 #157

Are you Brock? Bubzer Apr 2016 #158

Lol~ sheshe2 Apr 2016 #159

Do you know who Brock is? Bubzer Apr 2016 #161

Oh please. I can find plenty of articles that show the Globe is conservative... Bubzer Apr 2016 #32

I said the Globe was liberal compared to the Herald. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #42

ROTFL. So now its a "By comparison" thing? Stop being disingenous. Bubzer Apr 2016 #48

I am not the one being disingenuous here. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #51

Yes you are. So long. Bubzer Apr 2016 #52

OFFS Marrah_G Apr 2016 #72

You know the Herald is a conservative paper, right? Marrah_G Apr 2016 #71

According to who? You? Bubzer Apr 2016 #115

according to anyone with the faintest awareness of national media. kwassa Apr 2016 #135

I now think he is being intentionally dense. Marrah_G Apr 2016 #138

Nope... just not taking the word of somone supporting a consumate liar and cheater. Bubzer Apr 2016 #147

It's not intentional. kwassa Apr 2016 #163

Ahhh... you too eh? Well I'll happily repeat my response for you as well: Bubzer Apr 2016 #146

According to anyone who lives here Marrah_G Apr 2016 #137

Ahh...so, then not you. Thanks for that clarification. Here's a hint; You're not an authority... Bubzer Apr 2016 #141

You do not want to know the truth Marrah_G Apr 2016 #142

So says somone supporting a consumate liar and cheater. Bubzer Apr 2016 #145

Kick and R BeanMusical Apr 2016 #38

Last month? RandySF Apr 2016 #53

Which candidate is likeable? Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #55

Imagine that. crim son Apr 2016 #56

I never flocked. yuiyoshida Apr 2016 #60

That's cause you're awesome yuiyoshida! Bubzer Apr 2016 #116

Thank You...a song for you! yuiyoshida Apr 2016 #120

Awesome! Bubzer Apr 2016 #123

one more!! yuiyoshida Apr 2016 #124

The current percentages Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #62

I guess women don't like corporate gigolos. mhatrw Apr 2016 #64

In short: Hillary is toast! Helen Borg Apr 2016 #68

It's a "Fox News Channel poll" published in a RW rag. I would love for the poll to be accurate but pampango Apr 2016 #70

Clintons and Scientology Scharlui Apr 2016 #73

It's news to me here in the USA nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #75

Nooooooooo---I don't even want to click on it. I don't care for her but she's not THAT stupid. zazen Apr 2016 #76

ok, so that sounds like a Scientologist donor got her to do an unethical favor zazen Apr 2016 #77

You need to post this in GD-P. pinebox Apr 2016 #94

Yes, they NEED to! ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #166

fox poll, everyone knows fox is an arm of the republican party..so agenda is always anti-clinton. Sunlei Apr 2016 #86

"...in a Fox News Channel poll..." apnu Apr 2016 #89

Thanks for the article beastie boy Apr 2016 #97

Keep playing that woman card, Hill! CharlotteVale Apr 2016 #100

LOL, Republican rag paper. wisteria Apr 2016 #112

Beware female defectors... MattSh Apr 2016 #128

She's a heartless mean spirited person Baobab Apr 2016 #139