Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
16. I don't know what to believe
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:58 AM
May 2016

But this statement sent up a huge red flag.

The British conservative weekly The Spectator used the database and found that "Emma Charlotte Duerre Watson" is a beneficiary in an offshore company based in the British Virgin Islands. The magazine used the discovery to suggest that Watson's continued political activism could lead to more questions about her use of this offshore company.


In other words, even the most anodyne form of liberal activism (and surely her modest suggestion that men ought to treat women with more respect barely even qualifies in that regard) is enough to get the right-wing press going through your financial records with a fine-tooth comb, looking for dirt.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Emma Watson named in Panama Papers [View all] NobodyHere May 2016 OP
Of course conservatives and liberals... ReRe May 2016 #1
Sorry, Emma. . .don't believe you. Feeling the Bern May 2016 #2
I don't know what to believe nxylas May 2016 #16
not private anymore Emma... wildbilln864 May 2016 #3
Oh I bet is was for privacy reasons, alright. Surely she is one of highest paid of her profession. silvershadow May 2016 #4
Not in the top 10...but very well-paid, I'm sure. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #60
Two of Hillary Clintons biggest campaign contributors have been named ThinkCritically May 2016 #5
But not Hillary herself, Chicago1980 May 2016 #10
You shall be known by the company you keep. Cassiopeia May 2016 #12
Yes, guilt by association is a long-standing pillar of legal philosophy Orrex May 2016 #17
If they were associates of a GOP official, it'd be trending at the top. 7962 May 2016 #14
Hillary, herself, just uses the Delaware tax haven. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #24
Another SanderiSta Lie dbackjon May 2016 #31
Trump and Clinton share Delaware tax 'loophole' address with 285,000 firms w4rma May 2016 #56
except it is not a Tax Shelter. dbackjon May 2016 #57
Tens of thousands of companies avoid hundreds of millions … in tax through the …“Delaware loophole”. w4rma May 2016 #68
I know the facts dbackjon May 2016 #69
No. You obfuscate the facts. You cherry pick one fact, and pretend others don't also exist. w4rma May 2016 #70
She has a Foundation. People need to know where to send donations... glowing May 2016 #47
Pro-Trump trolls posting all over Democratic Underground lately Democat May 2016 #38
I am NOT pro Trump... ThinkCritically May 2016 #73
Well that is a lame excuse. Safety? Anonymity? Geeesch! glinda May 2016 #6
You know she was a victim of a stalker, right? ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #8
See post #11 that I inadvertently addressed to someone else instead of you NT Ex Lurker May 2016 #19
Was he stalking her bank? GummyBearz May 2016 #27
Who knows? ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #66
If she was using that phony corporation to avoid paying her share of taxes it is everybodys business GummyBearz May 2016 #71
No logic here.... glinda May 2016 #64
I get it ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #67
Setting up an offshore corporation to avoid a stalker Ex Lurker May 2016 #11
One of her parents probably set it up Beaverhausen May 2016 #7
I don't believe her either... C Moon May 2016 #9
Lazy? No... greedy GummyBearz May 2016 #28
Emma Watson is not an American citizen notadmblnd May 2016 #52
Bet she does a Jimmy Carr. Bad Dog May 2016 #13
I imagine most of her fortune was made in the UK (since Ilsa May 2016 #15
yup, no big deal, just avoiding to pay taxes. no big deal. move along nothing to see. Javaman May 2016 #18
Liberals are guilty of tax evasion too. alarimer May 2016 #20
She could have done it to protect her wealth, not from the tax man, closeupready May 2016 #21
lol GummyBearz May 2016 #29
I know, lol, it sounds goofy, but "protecting assets" has been a marketing strategy closeupready May 2016 #35
It's still perfectly legal to have offshore accounts, you're just required to report them to the IRS Xithras May 2016 #46
I had one in France years ago ... closeupready May 2016 #50
I have an account in Sweden Bjornsdotter May 2016 #51
TAX DODGER!!!!!!!111!!!! closeupready May 2016 #54
I know! Bjornsdotter May 2016 #61
I had to look up Emma Watson to see who she was. I wouldn't recognize her if I tripped over her. nt valerief May 2016 #22
it appears to be legal so we should not be surprised it is used dembotoz May 2016 #23
Emma Watson is a good soul. I'll take her at her word, unless I specifically find out otherwise. w4rma May 2016 #25
Well, there's that whole hypocrisy thing. Frank Cannon May 2016 #32
Considering that it's legal and that she would support making it illegal, I don't see the hypocrisy. w4rma May 2016 #36
The 1% is bad, unless they are cute or famous Democat May 2016 #39
You're not making any sense, Democat. Would you murder the 1% down to the last woman and child? w4rma May 2016 #42
It was a joke on the DU philosophy that all rich people are evil Democat May 2016 #44
Your "joke" is neither accurate nor funny. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #55
You must be new here if you think that Democat May 2016 #58
Keep digging that hole for yourself. I've been a member of DU since right after the (s)election.(nt) w4rma May 2016 #63
A "good soul" who is avoiding paying her fair share of taxes FLPanhandle May 2016 #43
She says that she didn't get any tax benefit from the arrangement, whatsoever. w4rma May 2016 #45
That excuse is pretty weak FLPanhandle May 2016 #49
Finally: A reason to care about the Panama Papers leak—attractive people you know from your teevee w4rma May 2016 #65
They still never found who 'leaked' the banks records to the "journalist consortium"? Sunlei May 2016 #26
Well I put $1 on... GummyBearz May 2016 #30
some of the account names are billionaire Russians the USA placed financial sanctions on last yr. Sunlei May 2016 #34
Hadn't thought about that option GummyBearz May 2016 #37
The "privacy" excuse is bullshit. Nye Bevan May 2016 #33
DUers got angry when people setup Delaware corporations Democat May 2016 #41
I'm not liking excuse V1.0, maybe the next one will be more convincing MowCowWhoHow III May 2016 #40
Most likely set up by her accountant(s)? Jimbo S May 2016 #48
I'm pretty sure just about every account was set up by accountants NobodyHere May 2016 #53
Probably an innocent mistake Democat May 2016 #59
No Fan of emma Jesus Malverde May 2016 #62
The Panamanian company was involved with her purchase of a London residence on her behalf Monk06 May 2016 #72
Just wondering... Blue_Tires May 2016 #74
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Emma Watson named in Pana...»Reply #16