Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
76. What NATO member has Russia invaded????
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:09 PM
Jun 2016

Now, the Crimean was taken by the Russians, but the Ukraine is still between Russian and those troops AND THE UKRAINE IS NOT IN NATO. The revolt in the Eastern Ukraine has been supported by Russia, but again it is in the EASTERN UKRAINE, Poland is the nearest NATO country and it borders WESTERN UKRAINE. Thus you have the WHOLE UKRAINE between Russia and NATO in the area where Russian troops have been active.

On the other hand, it us NATO who is sending troops to the Baltics, all of which border Russia. Thus the only movement of troops have been from Western Europe to the Russian Border NOT from inside Russia to those same borders.

Your logic escapes me, the US sends troops to the border of Russia but that is NOT moving "anyone up to Russia's borders" while the only ACCUSATION OF THE movement of Russia troops has been to the Eastern Ukraine, which is NOT a member of NATO and NO RUSSIAN troops have been accused of being west of Kharkov let alone Kiev, thus even if Russian Troops are in the Eastern Ukraine that is still NOT near any border of any NATO country.

Remember the Ukraine is NOT in NATO. Poland is the nearest NATO member and it is the opposite of the Ukraine from where the fighting is occurring. Thus no movement of any Russian forces to the border of any NATO Country. NATO has even acknowledged that the Russians have NOT even moved their troops from their positions around St Petersburgh. NATO does said Russia has flown by their borders, but NATO does that to Russia all of the time.

As to reconquering Europe, Russia best weapon to do so is its Oil and Natural Gas Reserves. Russia sells its natural gas and oil to Europe and China and that makes them both dependent on Russia (and one of the reason many of our NATO allies want to end this provocations of Russia, but no one is listening in France or Germany, who will will need to support any "Defense" of the Baltics). Thus Putin does NOT need take Europe by force, he is the dealer of what Europe is addicted to and sooner or later all addicts come to think of their dealers as their best friend.

Saudi Arabia is the only real threat to Russia's supply of oil to Europe. US Fracking of oil and Natural Gas had been expected to peak out on 2017, but the drop in oil and natural gas prices have stop drilling early and Russia and Saudi Arabia has picked up the slack.

In many ways, oil and Natural Gas may be why the US are sending these troops to the Baltics, to force Putin do spend money on defense, that would be better spent on expanding Russia's natural gas production (Russia has admitted it expects its oil production to decline over the next several decades but expect to be in the top three oil producers for several decades). Natural Gas is Russia's most important weapon and with the fracking bust in the US, it will remain Russia's most important weapon for it will force Europe to come to Russia NOT Russia to Europe. Thus Putin will position Russia to be like the US was in WWII, the biggest oil producers to a post war Europe that became more and more addicted to oil. That is how the US controlled and dominated NATO (and how the US defeated Hitler). Russia, even during WWII was already the #2 oil producer (and one of the reason the US did not attack Russia in 1945, Russia had the oil to defend itself, unlike Hitler whose attack on Russia cut him off from his oil supplies, which prior to the invasion of Russia was from Russia. The subsequent lack of oil was the primary reason Hitler lost WWII.

Putin will NOT attack NATO, he does not have to, for Russia is the supplier of what Europe is addicted to and as long as that is the case, Russia will be in position to demand from Europe what Europe wants.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And Russia Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #1
Only logical, as U.S. broke its promise not to expand NATO into Eastern Europe. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #21
At least we did not invade Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #22
No. We just create power vacuums after invading sovereign nations. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #23
I don't agree with that either Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #24
Which sovereign nations did the US invade in Eastern Europe? anigbrowl Jun 2016 #93
You just made that theory up. I did not classify a region. LS_Editor Jun 2016 #99
Why should we judge Eastern Europe by the standards of what goes on in the Middle East? anigbrowl Jun 2016 #100
The U.S. wants a mulligan on the Middle East and its actions in Iraq? LS_Editor Jun 2016 #104
Why should the Russians have the authority to tell Eastern European countries tabasco Jun 2016 #25
It's not in the US interest... Xolodno Jun 2016 #33
LOL, NATO was created and exists, to protect us all from Russia. Russia has no place inside it. braddy Jun 2016 #40
NATO was created in response to the Soviet Union. Xolodno Jun 2016 #48
The Russians enslaved empire and lost it, and want it back, NATO is still relevant and needed. braddy Jun 2016 #49
Well, its obvious. Xolodno Jun 2016 #52
How can something that isn't true, be "obvious" to you? braddy Jun 2016 #54
And yet...you are the one who laughed off inclusion of Russia into NATO. Xolodno Jun 2016 #57
What nation do you live in? You are far more dedicated to Russian military goals it seems than just braddy Jun 2016 #59
Again, do you have a seat at the Kremlin? Xolodno Jun 2016 #62
You are rambling more and more and repeating yourself. What country do you live in? braddy Jun 2016 #63
Any you are just lashing out because... Xolodno Jun 2016 #65
You haven't called anything, you just keep evading and rambling, and making up stuff. braddy Jun 2016 #67
No, I've supported my statements Xolodno Jun 2016 #69
No, on a thread about Poland having a NATO exercise, you drifted off into ramblings, falsehoods, and braddy Jun 2016 #71
*Nb. "Monroe Doctrine" Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #81
Have you heard of the Monroe Doctrine? yurbud Jun 2016 #103
We never made such a promise. Show us that treaty. braddy Jun 2016 #27
It was never a treaty. Xolodno Jun 2016 #34
Exactly, there never was such an agreement, I have looked it up in the past when braddy Jun 2016 #35
To say the US didn't give any assurances is fake. Xolodno Jun 2016 #39
No, it isn't fake, and no single member of NATO can issue such a treaty, braddy Jun 2016 #41
You are misrepresenting what I stated in the attempt to propogate a lie. Xolodno Jun 2016 #45
Russia is not operating on something that never existed, your mythical secret promise of a single braddy Jun 2016 #47
Wow. Did you ever come unglued. Xolodno Jun 2016 #50
You keep describing a non existent agreement with a single NATO nation, the U.S. as being what braddy Jun 2016 #53
I never indicated Russia was operating on the US given assurance of not expanding NATO. Xolodno Jun 2016 #55
You seem to be simply in support of Russia's military goals, period. You even defend them braddy Jun 2016 #56
I never stated such a thing. Xolodno Jun 2016 #60
None of that rambling post made any sense, especially since the topic is NATO braddy Jun 2016 #61
Of course it doesn't, you only see things from terms of "propoganda". Xolodno Jun 2016 #64
You can't change the fact that Sweden is being forced to up it's defenses and consider NATO braddy Jun 2016 #66
Again, I didn't say that. Xolodno Jun 2016 #68
LOL, yes, you said that Sweden alone could defeat a Russian invasion of war, which is ridiculous. braddy Jun 2016 #70
And Russia broke the Budapest memorandum Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #32
Eastern Europe wanted in because they are scared of the Russians. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #84
Which is why deciding to taunt and belittle them is so stupid scscholar Jun 2016 #26
Q: Who are the "separatists" in Poland? Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #2
re-read uhnope Jun 2016 #5
Yes. Why should other countries be concerned Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #7
The Baltics have large Russian populations hack89 Jun 2016 #8
I'm aware of the Russian-speakers in the Baltic countries, Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #10
Russia wants to rebuild their empire hack89 Jun 2016 #11
I think Russia would like to economically and socially develop Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #13
Ukraine and Crimea says otherwise. nt hack89 Jun 2016 #17
You are aware that referenda were held Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #18
After Russia destabilized those regions and forcefully ejected the legitimate government. hack89 Jun 2016 #19
Crimea being part of Ukraine is a bit of a stretch. Xolodno Jun 2016 #36
That still does not justify a military take over by Russia, now does it? nt hack89 Jun 2016 #37
A military, supported coups, etc. are never justified...including those done by us. Xolodno Jun 2016 #42
Based on Russia's recent behavior, I would say the Baltics and Poland have legitimate concerns. hack89 Jun 2016 #44
Well of course they should strengthen their ties with NATO. It would be foolish not to. But.... Xolodno Jun 2016 #46
lol. your reply is right out of Kremlin talking points uhnope Jun 2016 #102
Because these countries also have borders with Russia uhnope Jun 2016 #9
I see. But why would Russia want to "stir up" Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #12
The same motivation that Putin had in invading, occupying, and annexing uhnope Jun 2016 #14
I see. Thank you. n/t Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #16
His reasoning is flawed, like usual. Xolodno Jun 2016 #38
lol versus your Kafkaesque/Orwellian "reasoning" that always ended up with Hail Putin uhnope Jun 2016 #101
It is Russia moving up to NATO borders, NATO is positioning within NATO itself. braddy Jun 2016 #28
So NATO's job is to protect countries who deny the right to vote to some of its "residents". happyslug Jun 2016 #72
NATO is an alliance to protect each other from Russia. braddy Jun 2016 #73
So we are to protect a country that DENY the right to vote from a country that permits such votes? happyslug Jun 2016 #74
NATO is the alliance, and NATO has no intention of surrendering to Russia, and that goes for the braddy Jun 2016 #75
Godspeed. nt uhnope Jun 2016 #3
Real message: US... send money... lots of green backs... now yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #4
"Security fears" is establishment propaganda speak for Onlaketime Jun 2016 #6
Thank you. I have observed the same. n/t Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #15
sorry, but you are posting falsehoods uhnope Jun 2016 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #87
NATO is not invading anyone up Russia's borders, it is Russia invading to NATO's borders. braddy Jun 2016 #29
... MattSh Jun 2016 #30
I guess you agree that invading Ukraine is conquering right up to NATO borders, whereas NATO braddy Jun 2016 #31
What NATO member has Russia invaded???? happyslug Jun 2016 #76
Please don't waste my time making up things for me, I neve mentioned that they had invaded a NATO braddy Jun 2016 #77
I foresee War if the NATO keeps up its present polices. happyslug Jun 2016 #79
You seem confused, it is NATO who is in charge of their own defense, and you are wrong to call braddy Jun 2016 #80
I think the drop in oil prices was engineered CanadaexPat Jun 2016 #83
because the Poles have no reason based on their history to fear Russia nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #51
Russia left Poland voluntary, something that we can not said of the Germans happyslug Jun 2016 #78
I Support This Norman Conch Quest Jun 2016 #43
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #88
3,000 American moms, dads, brothers and sisters... Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #89
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #90
Onlaketime. That's Ok, we understand & get used to it. Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #91
Not proud that Canada is taking part in this dog and pony show Monk06 Jun 2016 #58
I don't think Canadas government would want putin to 'pull another Ukraine' on Poland either. Sunlei Jun 2016 #86
I know a Polish couple that immigrated to Canada in the late eighties Monk06 Jun 2016 #98
I would like to thank posters above Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #82
This thread is infested with paid Putin shills... Odin2005 Jun 2016 #85
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #92
LOL, I've been a socialist since my teens and are accusing me of McCarthyism? Odin2005 Jun 2016 #94
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #95
Yep, you are a conspiracy loon, arguing with you is pointless. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #96
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #97
Technically, this is on the Russian border. sofa king Jun 2016 #105
Thanks for that! Nihil Jun 2016 #106
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NATO starts biggest ever ...»Reply #76