Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,204 posts)
60. And that public records office has a budget and a staff that is stretched
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:23 PM
Jun 2016

to the limit. If the Rethugs in Congress want to push these fishing expedition FOIA requests, then they should pass a bill increasing the budget.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sour grapes, dear? sister_rosa_refried Jun 2016 #1
So, when a Republican uses this bullshit excuse, Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #18
One can say "Brought to you by the people extending music/video copyrights to author+70 years!" TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #38
Yeah, both sides do it is such a wonderful excuse Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #41
HRC - normalizing corrupt behavior one brainwashed supporter at a time - n/t Locrian Jun 2016 #52
+1,000,000 Dont call me Shirley Jun 2016 #67
So if the IRS needs doccuments from me, can I just tell them, I'm a bit busy Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #2
Only way you can get away with it is if said documents need to be gone over to make sure cstanleytech Jun 2016 #4
I have Accountant–client privilege Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #6
Problem being there's little penalty for evading FOIA. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #3
And this overreaching abuse of the system is proving there shouldn't be. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #7
Either you support the Freedom of Information Act or you don't MisterFred Jun 2016 #10
I used to. But when they start asking for 450,000 documents at a time, pnwmom Jun 2016 #11
Nah. MisterFred Jun 2016 #13
All those documents have to be reviewed. It's not just a matter of printing them out. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #16
Nevertheless the State Department's purported capacity is not reasonable. strategery blunder Jun 2016 #19
This is just one request among many. The State department staff has other things to pnwmom Jun 2016 #23
And I'm sure State would be more than happy to explain these "other things" strategery blunder Jun 2016 #32
Where were the Democratic party requests for 450,000 pages when Bush was President? pnwmom Jun 2016 #34
A good question, but irrelevant to the current discussion. blackspade Jun 2016 #43
No, not irrelevant. They're abusing the process, just like everything else. pnwmom Jun 2016 #46
So because it is being abused is the excuse for stonewalling? blackspade Jun 2016 #48
I don't see it as stone-walling. I see it as trying to fit those requests into pnwmom Jun 2016 #50
You do realize that answering FOIA does not have anything to do with the... blackspade Jun 2016 #59
And that public records office has a budget and a staff that is stretched pnwmom Jun 2016 #60
Still deliberately missing the point.... blackspade Jun 2016 #69
No budget for? former9thward Jun 2016 #35
Congress sets the State Department budget. nt pnwmom Jun 2016 #61
No the State Department requests a budget. former9thward Jun 2016 #62
Which the congress slashes -- and then passes the slashed version. For example, pnwmom Jun 2016 #63
A slashed version? former9thward Jun 2016 #64
I said there was no budget for ENDLESS requests. That would be impossible pnwmom Jun 2016 #65
State Dept uber alles reddread Jun 2016 #15
except for when it comes to Hillary apparently azurnoir Jun 2016 #17
Let history judge me, politicians are fond of saying. forest444 Jun 2016 #5
"...staff has been spread thin..." mia Jun 2016 #8
Rhetorical question? Or real? WhiteTara Jun 2016 #9
Because the State Department staff has much more important things pnwmom Jun 2016 #12
It's federal law. Complying with it is part of the the responsibility of every federal agency. merrily Jun 2016 #28
Because they don't want to hire anyone. MisterFred Jun 2016 #14
Why? Half our government does not want to fund government. Remember sequestration? eom Festivito Jun 2016 #33
if this is the way FOIA requests are going to be complied with Angel Martin Jun 2016 #20
I think the Corp Media would much rather a lot of the stuff remain hidden. Skwmom Jun 2016 #24
Exactly right. If FOIA requests are going to take decades, hughee99 Jun 2016 #40
to answer that question all you have to do Angel Martin Jun 2016 #49
translation: there's nothing there Skittles Jun 2016 #21
LOL! merrily Jun 2016 #27
We are a Banana Republic. n/t Skwmom Jun 2016 #22
Their excuse is not plausible. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #25
if you want to validate every Repub Angel Martin Jun 2016 #31
This is unfortunate for Kerry. Sad at this stage of his career. merrily Jun 2016 #26
I think Kerry has handled this entire mess as well as could have done. karynnj Jun 2016 #45
rubbish ! Angel Martin Jun 2016 #51
They are following the FOIA procedures that are law karynnj Jun 2016 #54
printing them on paper rather than Angel Martin Jun 2016 #57
I agree that when you are looking for what fits a criteria - electronic is better karynnj Jun 2016 #66
I know what I am talking about because I have worked Angel Martin Jun 2016 #68
75 years? Really? nt merrily Jun 2016 #53
As I wrote - I do not think they should have said 75 years karynnj Jun 2016 #55
I'm truly sorry. I love how you love Kerry. However, I see this as a blot on his legacy and I merrily Jun 2016 #56
So the Republican Congress should provide funds for he State Department so they can handle Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #29
Many years ago, as in 1980, I was working for the Federal Government. SheilaT Jun 2016 #30
The State Dept couldn't hire more people unless Congress increased its budget. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #36
That's why government agencies christx30 Jun 2016 #47
It has never seemed as though people with government jobs SheilaT Jun 2016 #58
The "most transparent administration ever" will be transparent in 75 years. Maybe. Scuba Jun 2016 #37
This is so much bullshit, it's unbelieveable that it was said. zalinda Jun 2016 #39
I do not know why they said 75 years, when they could have said that it can't be done by the end of karynnj Jun 2016 #42
Then hire more staff CJCRANE Jun 2016 #44
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»State Dept.: 75-year wait...»Reply #60