Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: California gun laws: Jerry Brown signs major new restrictions on firearms owners, rejects others [View all]happyslug
(14,779 posts)The actual cost of such coverage is so low, it is included in your home insurance today. A million dollar potential loss spread over a million people is just one dollar. The actual risk of a firearm kept in your home being used in a criminal act is so low that the actual yearly risk is measured in cents not dollars.
The risks of firearms and dogs in your home are so low neither is listed as an individual item on your home owner insurance and is included even if you do NOT own a dog or a firearm (the risks of both are so low, measured in cents not dollars, they are included to protect the bank holding any mortgage on the home more than any other reason).
Remember many firearm deaths are suicides, that rate has NOT dropped in decades. No insurance will cover suicides for the simple reason you do NOT want to put a person into a position that it is more profitable for his or her family for that person to shoot themselves then stay alive.
As to auto insurance, look at your coverage, hospital and medical care is the biggest single thing covered, damage to property is quite cheap. Adding a firearm clause will be measured in cents not dollars for compared to accidents with personal injury claim will be cheap. Today if something is stolen out of your car, you collect from your home owner insurance not your car insurance (subject to whatever deductible you have, such deductibles are high enough to exempt most such thiefs from being reported).
Sorry home insurance already covers the misuse of firearms.