Latest Breaking News

Baitball Blogger

(51,694 posts)

11. Can they appeal?

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Wed Nov 30, 2016, 10:04 AM

Nov 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge denies request for hand recount of Wisconsin's presidential election results [View all] riversedge Nov 2016 OP

And there it is there. tavernier Nov 2016 #1

They're using the same tactics they used in Florida in 2000. Bad Dog Nov 2016 #2

I have to disagree with this forthemiddle Nov 2016 #5

Thank you tavernier Nov 2016 #6

I live in here forthemiddle Nov 2016 #8

Let us know what you find out. Farmgirl1961 Nov 2016 #31

According to my County Clerk forthemiddle Nov 2016 #32

I'm betting any counties that do count by hand will find evidence of padding or other for Trump. anamandujano Nov 2016 #34

...and I'm betting they don't brooklynite Nov 2016 #38

They found padding, not hacking. Trump had to return 5K votes. The innocent "mistakes" anamandujano Nov 2016 #42

I am not trying to constantly debunk info today forthemiddle Nov 2016 #40

There were at least 3 counties and mistakes at each favored Trump. Coincidence? Doubt it. anamandujano Nov 2016 #43

Actually 2 others favored Clinton forthemiddle Nov 2016 #44

Could you pull out quotes from your links that state 2 errors favored Clinton? I skimmed them anamandujano Nov 2016 #46

Sure forthemiddle Nov 2016 #47

That doesn't in any way match the 5K votes padded on to Trump's total & only removed AFTER anamandujano Nov 2016 #49

Exactly, every major "error" magically broke in Drumpf's favor radius777 Nov 2016 #54

Thanks for keeping us informed. Much appreciated. Farmgirl1961 Nov 2016 #56

The "written law" is in conflict with Federal Law of the land which says voter intent supersedes ... Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2016 #9

That may be true forthemiddle Nov 2016 #10

Here is your evidence. anamandujano Nov 2016 #35

story debunked from Snopes forthemiddle Nov 2016 #41

Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #45

I agree. hamsterjill Nov 2016 #30

That is where all the money is going. anamandujano Nov 2016 #37

it still seems well dodgy. Bad Dog Nov 2016 #12

According the article, law says all counties can be required to do Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2016 #13

The Judge asked the expert if it had ever happened in Wisconsin forthemiddle Nov 2016 #14

What is "it" - did "it" ever happen in Wisconsin? If you mean to say electronic fraud, then Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2016 #18

Here is a link forthemiddle Nov 2016 #21

Ok thx - so nothing about absentee ballot weirdness or exit polls being much further off in certain Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2016 #58

The proof is that there were more votes reported then the number of people who rainy Nov 2016 #26

They are doing hand recounts because it is faster. Tiggeroshii Nov 2016 #53

Not surprised. DK504 Nov 2016 #17

Using the courts to shut down recounts Ohioblue22 Nov 2016 #3

The damn machines - who knows how they might be programmed. Vinca Nov 2016 #4

If other civilized nations Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #28

but partisan judges can't be bothered with finding out facts mdbl Nov 2016 #7

Can they appeal? Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #11

I'm sure they can forthemiddle Nov 2016 #15

It should be appealed, just the same. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #20

53 of 72 counties forthemiddle Nov 2016 #22

Phenom. Thanks. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #24

Thank you. KittyWampus Nov 2016 #48

I understand Hillary's lawyer is a lawyer, but the problem is a little more serious than yurbud Nov 2016 #16

Anybody know which countys are not handcounting? Ellipsis Nov 2016 #19

I haven't seen a list forthemiddle Nov 2016 #23

Find out which ones are not hand-counting and do an FOIA demand. Aimee in OKC Nov 2016 #55

I think it'll be a little simpler then that. Ellipsis Nov 2016 #57

Maybeso, maybeno ... Aimee in OKC Nov 2016 #59

A Real Audit radalpha Nov 2016 #25

So 3.5 million dollars to do what? Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #27

I just read that they upped the price from 1.1 million. Stein griped but handed it over. anamandujano Nov 2016 #39

But to do what? Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #52

Ambiguity of voter intent not a factor benpollard Nov 2016 #29

The fix is in philosslayer Nov 2016 #33

back when they used those scanning machines for student test scores they missed lots of 'bubbles' Sunlei Nov 2016 #36

Yeah, this is exactly what I expected. lark Nov 2016 #50

Must be just another.. pbmus Nov 2016 #51