Latest Breaking News

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)

53. They are doing hand recounts because it is faster.

Wed Nov 30, 2016, 03:31 PM

Nov 2016

Booting up the machines again and reprogramming them, will take an unnecessarily longer amount of time then just counting the hand receipts. Stein's argument should have been geared towards respecting the December 13 deadline for the recount. Not for catching fraud.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge denies request for hand recount of Wisconsin's presidential election results [View all] riversedge Nov 2016 OP

And there it is there. tavernier Nov 2016 #1

They're using the same tactics they used in Florida in 2000. Bad Dog Nov 2016 #2

I have to disagree with this forthemiddle Nov 2016 #5

Thank you tavernier Nov 2016 #6

I live in here forthemiddle Nov 2016 #8

Let us know what you find out. Farmgirl1961 Nov 2016 #31

According to my County Clerk forthemiddle Nov 2016 #32

I'm betting any counties that do count by hand will find evidence of padding or other for Trump. anamandujano Nov 2016 #34

...and I'm betting they don't brooklynite Nov 2016 #38

They found padding, not hacking. Trump had to return 5K votes. The innocent "mistakes" anamandujano Nov 2016 #42

I am not trying to constantly debunk info today forthemiddle Nov 2016 #40

There were at least 3 counties and mistakes at each favored Trump. Coincidence? Doubt it. anamandujano Nov 2016 #43

Actually 2 others favored Clinton forthemiddle Nov 2016 #44

Could you pull out quotes from your links that state 2 errors favored Clinton? I skimmed them anamandujano Nov 2016 #46

Sure forthemiddle Nov 2016 #47

That doesn't in any way match the 5K votes padded on to Trump's total & only removed AFTER anamandujano Nov 2016 #49

Exactly, every major "error" magically broke in Drumpf's favor radius777 Nov 2016 #54

Thanks for keeping us informed. Much appreciated. Farmgirl1961 Nov 2016 #56

The "written law" is in conflict with Federal Law of the land which says voter intent supersedes ... Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2016 #9

That may be true forthemiddle Nov 2016 #10

Here is your evidence. anamandujano Nov 2016 #35

story debunked from Snopes forthemiddle Nov 2016 #41

Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #45

I agree. hamsterjill Nov 2016 #30

That is where all the money is going. anamandujano Nov 2016 #37

it still seems well dodgy. Bad Dog Nov 2016 #12

According the article, law says all counties can be required to do Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2016 #13

The Judge asked the expert if it had ever happened in Wisconsin forthemiddle Nov 2016 #14

What is "it" - did "it" ever happen in Wisconsin? If you mean to say electronic fraud, then Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2016 #18

Here is a link forthemiddle Nov 2016 #21

Ok thx - so nothing about absentee ballot weirdness or exit polls being much further off in certain Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2016 #58

The proof is that there were more votes reported then the number of people who rainy Nov 2016 #26

They are doing hand recounts because it is faster. Tiggeroshii Nov 2016 #53

Not surprised. DK504 Nov 2016 #17

Using the courts to shut down recounts Ohioblue22 Nov 2016 #3

The damn machines - who knows how they might be programmed. Vinca Nov 2016 #4

If other civilized nations Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #28

but partisan judges can't be bothered with finding out facts mdbl Nov 2016 #7

Can they appeal? Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #11

I'm sure they can forthemiddle Nov 2016 #15

It should be appealed, just the same. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #20

53 of 72 counties forthemiddle Nov 2016 #22

Phenom. Thanks. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #24

Thank you. KittyWampus Nov 2016 #48

I understand Hillary's lawyer is a lawyer, but the problem is a little more serious than yurbud Nov 2016 #16

Anybody know which countys are not handcounting? Ellipsis Nov 2016 #19

I haven't seen a list forthemiddle Nov 2016 #23

Find out which ones are not hand-counting and do an FOIA demand. Aimee in OKC Nov 2016 #55

I think it'll be a little simpler then that. Ellipsis Nov 2016 #57

Maybeso, maybeno ... Aimee in OKC Nov 2016 #59

A Real Audit radalpha Nov 2016 #25

So 3.5 million dollars to do what? Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #27

I just read that they upped the price from 1.1 million. Stein griped but handed it over. anamandujano Nov 2016 #39

But to do what? Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #52

Ambiguity of voter intent not a factor benpollard Nov 2016 #29

The fix is in philosslayer Nov 2016 #33

back when they used those scanning machines for student test scores they missed lots of 'bubbles' Sunlei Nov 2016 #36

Yeah, this is exactly what I expected. lark Nov 2016 #50

Must be just another.. pbmus Nov 2016 #51