Federal judge ends Michigan presidential recount

[Land Shark]

17. Having done post-election litigation myself, your comments are disappointing

Election law is a rigged game of sorts, 100% made by election winners who do not want their victories questioned. Ever. A person that tries nevertheless to at least get a peek through the curtains of election secrecy only to face the inevitable blizzard of lawsuits, bad press and millions in costs is a hero.

There is zero evidence to support the results as certified. Literally no human being alive knows if the results are correct or not and recounts won't FULLY settle the question, especially since Michigan is excluding over 600 of the worst precincts from recounts, and then claiming that the recount doesn't show much of anything so far. Wow.

All election results are completely and utterly inherently uncertain when done by machines. Doing nothing about that is hardly admirable. Doing something is risky, but not fraudulent.

The giant fraud here is that the government is set up to secure our rights (decl. Of Independence) including specifically the right to alter or abolish that government (decl. Of Independence). Any system of computerized vote counting is so easily rigged by any insider that we don't have the right to kick the bums out of office IF THEY ARE CROOKS, because crooks cheat. That is what they do. And it is child's play to rig a computer you are the admin ofor, like election officials with electronic voting machines.

I'm very disappointed in anyone who calls the investigation of electronic voting fraudulent as opposed to the voting system itself, which deliberately keeps evidence hidden upon which a rational person could form an evidence-based belief that the reported results were accurate.