Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump transition team for Energy Department seeks names of employees involved in climate meetings [View all]MBS
(9,688 posts)10. another excerpt
(The !!!!! is my editorial comment)
.
. . In many cases, the inquiries meshed with the priorities of conservative groups such as the Heritage Foundation, which held a meeting on energy and environment issues in Washington on Thursday, as well as priorities outlined in a recent fundraising pitch sent by the American Energy Alliance (AEA), a wing of the Institute for Energy Research. Thomas Pyle, who heads AEA, leads Trumps Energy Department transition team. In a recent fundraising pitch, Pyle wrote supporters, After eight years of the Obama administrations (!!!!!) divisive energy and environmental policies, the American people have voted for a change a big change. We expect the Trump administration will adopt pro-energy and pro-market policies much different than the Obama administrations top-down government approach.
. . .
My guess is that theyre trying to undermine the credibility of the science that DOE has produced, particularly in the field of climate science, said Rob Jackson, a Stanford climate and energy researcher, in response to the question about the Integrated Assessment Models.
The questionnaire also appeared to take aim at the national laboratories, which operate with a high degree of independence but which are part of the Energy Department. The questionnaire asked for a list of the top 20 salaried employees of the labs, the labs peer-reviewed publications over the past three years, a list of their professional society memberships, affiliations, and the websites they maintain or contribute to during work hours. Researchers at national labs focus on a range of issues, including renewable energy development and climate analysis.
. . .
My guess is that theyre trying to undermine the credibility of the science that DOE has produced, particularly in the field of climate science, said Rob Jackson, a Stanford climate and energy researcher, in response to the question about the Integrated Assessment Models.
The questionnaire also appeared to take aim at the national laboratories, which operate with a high degree of independence but which are part of the Energy Department. The questionnaire asked for a list of the top 20 salaried employees of the labs, the labs peer-reviewed publications over the past three years, a list of their professional society memberships, affiliations, and the websites they maintain or contribute to during work hours. Researchers at national labs focus on a range of issues, including renewable energy development and climate analysis.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump transition team for Energy Department seeks names of employees involved in climate meetings [View all]
MBS
Dec 2016
OP
That's how I've been describing him to my husband. Imagine a 20 foot tall 2 y.o.
Hekate
Dec 2016
#25
i doubt very much our new overlords give any shits about healing national divides or science
0rganism
Dec 2016
#12
This is so so sooooooooooooo WRONG. These are Government workers and are not politial
riversedge
Dec 2016
#5
Yet such attention to detail is not in their sights for intell/security briefings
keithbvadu2
Dec 2016
#6
"Forging"? Uh oh... Trump supporters: "Yeah, let's weed out those rotten forgers!"
Towlie
Dec 2016
#8
Don't count on 2018 or 2020. I'm afraid the game is over now as far as using traditional means.
PSPS
Dec 2016
#52
"Are you now or have you ever been a member of a Climate Change research team"?
Crash2Parties
Dec 2016
#21
Not individuals, climate change science is woven into every department in government.
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#48
if climate change is a national security issue doesn't that make the trump admin a
certainot
Dec 2016
#58
This is scary that Trumps team is looking for people that perhaps disagree with them
lancelyons
Dec 2016
#64