Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(12,545 posts)
75. Looks like he's going after the Energy Information Administration, too
Sun Dec 11, 2016, 11:12 PM
Dec 2016

The EIA is an independent agency that collects and analysis data about energy production. The questions to the Department of Energy include 15 questions about the EIA, some oddly specific down to report details. Reading between the lines, the questions seem to indicate that DJT & Co think the EIA is biased against the fossil fuel industry, so I think we can expect purges there, too:

6. EIA is an independent agency in DOE. How has EIA ensured its independence in your data and analysis over the past 8 years? In what instances do you think EIA's independence was most challenged?

7. Part of EIA's charter is to do analyses based on Congressional and Departmental requests. Has EIA denied or not responded to any of these requests over the last ten years?

8. EIA customarily has or had set dates for completions of studies and reports. In general, have those dates been adhered to?

9. In the Annual Energy Outlook 2016, EIA assumed that the Clean Power Plan should be in the reference case despite the fact that the reference case is based on existing laws and regulations. Why did EIA make that assumption, which seems to be atypical of past forecasts?

10. EIA's assessments of levelized costs for renewable technologies do not contain back-up costs for the fossil fuel technologies that are brought on-line to replace the generation when those technologies are down. Is this is a correct representation of the true levelized costs?

11. Has EIA done analysis that shows that additional back-up generation is not needed? How does EIA's analysis compare with other analyses on this issue?

12. Renewable and solar technologies are expected to need additional transmission costs above what fossil technologies need. How has EIA represented this in the AEO forecasts? What is the magnitude of those transmission costs?

13. There are studies that show that your high resource and technology case for oil and gas represents the shale gas and oil renaissance far better than your reference case. Why has EIA not put those assumptions in your reference case?

14. Can you describe the number of personnel hired into management positions at EIA from outside EIA and compare it to the number of personnel hired into management positions at EIA who were currently serving at EIA?

15. How does EIA ensure quality in its data and analyses?

16. Where does EIA think most improvement is needed in its data and analyses?

17. We note that EIA added distributed solar estimations to your electricity data reports. Those numbers are not part of your supply/demand balance on a Btu basis. Why has that not been updated accordingly?

18. How many vacancies does EIA have in management and staff positions? What plans, if any, does EIA have to fill those positions before January 20?

19. Is the EIA budget sufficient to ensure quality in data and analyses? If not, where does it fall short?

20. Does EIA have cost comparisons of sources of electricity generation at the national level?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I believe Trump is just an Evil 2 year old Angry Dragon Dec 2016 #1
That's how I've been describing him to my husband. Imagine a 20 foot tall 2 y.o. Hekate Dec 2016 #25
He's like that evil kid in that Twilight Zone episode. Dave Starsky Dec 2016 #73
I guess witch-hunting season is officially open. DemoTex Dec 2016 #2
Now it begins!!!! Welcome to Dystopia!!!! LongTomH Dec 2016 #3
Begins? pangaia Dec 2016 #15
Ideological Purity Test bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #4
nor is it the way to do science. MBS Dec 2016 #7
i doubt very much our new overlords give any shits about healing national divides or science 0rganism Dec 2016 #12
In that case...... pangaia Dec 2016 #16
THANK YOU MBS Dec 2016 #19
Unfortunately greymattermom Dec 2016 #41
UGGGG. pangaia Dec 2016 #53
No good will come of anything Trump does bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #51
So if we do what we can to INFORM what public we can reach, that is something. pangaia Dec 2016 #56
The Zampolits - Political Commissars, are already making the rounds. Xipe Totec Dec 2016 #46
This is so so sooooooooooooo WRONG. These are Government workers and are not politial riversedge Dec 2016 #5
Want to bet Bear Creek Dec 2016 #34
Yet such attention to detail is not in their sights for intell/security briefings keithbvadu2 Dec 2016 #6
Their priorities are revealing, aren't they? n/t MBS Dec 2016 #28
"Forging"? Uh oh... Trump supporters: "Yeah, let's weed out those rotten forgers!" Towlie Dec 2016 #8
The stench of fascism and persecution is spreading over the Nation lunatica Dec 2016 #9
you are right. MBS Dec 2016 #14
it IS a done deal.. pangaia Dec 2016 #18
I anticipate that working for maybe one confirmation. Amimnoch Dec 2016 #42
You are probably right. pangaia Dec 2016 #45
Don't count on 2018 or 2020. I'm afraid the game is over now as far as using traditional means. PSPS Dec 2016 #52
It is a coup bdamomma Dec 2016 #72
Alot of very good people are going to leave government. They simply will not LuckyLib Dec 2016 #74
Yes, unfortunately. MBS Dec 2016 #77
another excerpt MBS Dec 2016 #10
This is a witch hunt. dhol82 Dec 2016 #24
You bet. MBS Dec 2016 #27
Damn, this is sooooo going back to McCarthy and the John Birch Society dhol82 Dec 2016 #31
Even worse. MBS Dec 2016 #33
I think that much of this comes from Bannon dhol82 Dec 2016 #43
Plus the extra-rabid reps of the fossil fuel industry MBS Dec 2016 #49
This all getting so disturbing dhol82 Dec 2016 #60
yup, that's it in a nutshell, alright. MBS Dec 2016 #62
Wonder if part of this comes from Pence? dhol82 Dec 2016 #44
Can not imagine the Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #29
Will their union survive the Trumpistas? dhol82 Dec 2016 #32
That will be a though one. Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #36
Sounds like the Carrier deal dhol82 Dec 2016 #59
Yah right, Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #63
But then there are the scientists, too. MBS Dec 2016 #35
Reagan's PATCO on Roid's. Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #37
I work for a national lab. drray23 Dec 2016 #66
I probably will end up on this list.nt. drray23 Dec 2016 #65
What's next - a loyalty oath? dhol82 Dec 2016 #11
You must have missed it. pangaia Dec 2016 #20
This is seriously troubling and reeks of jimlup Dec 2016 #13
Yes, troubling indeed. MBS Dec 2016 #17
Sadly, they don't care. dhol82 Dec 2016 #23
"Are you now or have you ever been a member of a Climate Change research team"? Crash2Parties Dec 2016 #21
Nice to know what their priorities are! logosoco Dec 2016 #22
Heil Trumpler Hekate Dec 2016 #26
But there's no difference between Trump and Hillary Clinton! yardwork Dec 2016 #30
YOUR PAPERS PLEASE! truthisfreedom Dec 2016 #38
Mother Nature doesn't give a fuck what Trump thinks. hunter Dec 2016 #39
Mar el Lago is a sitting duck for sea-level rise. MBS Dec 2016 #47
And it couldn't happen to a nicer guy leftyladyfrommo Dec 2016 #71
Trump will finally get to use his catch phrase... lame54 Dec 2016 #40
Not individuals, climate change science is woven into every department in government. Sunlei Dec 2016 #48
EXACTLY. MBS Dec 2016 #54
The hope is jow shifting to China TheHak Dec 2016 #50
Exactly. MBS Dec 2016 #57
Every employee for the Department of Energy should sign onto the list Freethinker65 Dec 2016 #55
if climate change is a national security issue doesn't that make the trump admin a certainot Dec 2016 #58
I think they are already. MBS Dec 2016 #61
This is scary that Trumps team is looking for people that perhaps disagree with them lancelyons Dec 2016 #64
At what point will tom_kelly Dec 2016 #67
Trumpland is the new Russia. Scary. n/t Little Tich Dec 2016 #68
I'm adding links to the authors of this article mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2016 #69
Thanks! MBS Dec 2016 #70
Looks like he's going after the Energy Information Administration, too William Seger Dec 2016 #75
Wow. MBS Dec 2016 #76
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump transition team for...»Reply #75