Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: DNC allies incensed by Clinton criticism [View all]Bradical79
(4,490 posts)104. I agree with the DNC on this one.
Hillary Clinton is a very smart politician, but not a data science expert. The data was good, it was how the data was used that is the problem. The Russians, and Republicans who the Russians provided the stolen DNC data to, were able to effectively use the data to microtarget voters in these states that the campaign didn't recognize as being close enough to steal. Data collection seems fine.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The process of revitalization should not be trivialized into "he-said, she said". nt
BumRushDaShow
Jun 2017
#92
Correct. But the OP article author added emotional/subjective overtones, negating any added value
BumRushDaShow
Jun 2017
#98
Just as people are entitled to defend themselves and their careers when she calls them out
BeyondGeography
Jun 2017
#21
Anyone who said that clearly didn't listen to what Sec Clinton actuallly said in her interview....
Docreed2003
Jun 2017
#8
Well said. People are determined to cultivate a narrative about HRC, using any opportunity they get.
StevieM
Jun 2017
#73
CNN: Democrats to Clinton: The DNC's data was fine -- you just used it wrong
Omaha Steve
Jun 2017
#11
I would assume that if he were still working there, he would have used less inflammatory language
karynnj
Jun 2017
#25
I can tell you as a call banker into the swing states, the call lists and down times were less than
still_one
Jun 2017
#30
I think it was VERY important Hillary said what she said. She has now challenged the DNC to prove
OnDoutside
Jun 2017
#27
Who gives a f**k. Hillary has every right to speak out based on the bullshit she has had to put up
still_one
Jun 2017
#28
It sounds like she's starting with the little stuff and getting to the big stuff.
ucrdem
Jun 2017
#33
her side of the story is entirely self-serving. No "please avoid my mistakes" lessons to impart
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#48
She did take responsibility but we all know there were a lot of factors- she discussed them all.
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#46
domyou have a quote saying her own mistakes didn't factor in? I didn't hear that.
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#51
"'I take responsibility for every decision I made, but that's not why I lost'."
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#52
Weird because I actually agree with her on this. At one point she admits Americans wanted the lies..
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#58
except she explicitly denied that she did anything that caused her to lose the race.
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#69
She said that they did fuck up and didn't realize their data was off- what's not true there?
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#71
Not campaigning in Wisconsin or Michigan is her fault, hers and her campaign strategists.
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#72
Again, you're focusing on one of a dozen mistakes. If it makes you feel better, great.
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#74
she already acknowledged that mistakes were made or is she always to bang on about ..
JHan
Jun 2017
#77
I think the collusion between Russia and the GOP is a huge issue- more important than any
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#78
Russia/Collusion is a huge issue. But Hillary Clinton is the very last person
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#82
And "we" as Democrats had no means to counter the weaponization of data by Bannon and Co.
JHan
Jun 2017
#114
the last thing that will ever happen is someone silencing Hillary Clinton.
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#87
I've actually had lots of productive discussions about the effect of misogyny last year...
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#93
That the most transparent candidate the field was smeared with false allegations of cronyism
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#96
Tr*mp figured out that most WWC voters really don't care about things like transparency, ethics,
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#97
Same as that demographic has been since 1860--never on the right side of history nt
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#100
She still loses the election if she had won MI & WI. She lost PA despite campaigning heavily there.
LonePirate
Jun 2017
#109
I wondered if she had used Obama enough but I don't think it would have helped with those voters.
bettyellen
Jun 2017
#111
Simple question: who would the GOP rather be the public face of the Democratic party
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#89
If the goal is to protect Booker from being smeared by the GOP's and the BoB's then
emulatorloo
Jun 2017
#106
Then HRC can keep the BoB's and the Breitbart's distracted this year and the next
emulatorloo
Jun 2017
#118
Hillary did take responsibility for her mistakes, but that part is not shown in news clips.
SunSeeker
Jun 2017
#42
saying "I take responsibility" is not the same thing as actually taking responsibility.
geek tragedy
Jun 2017
#44
It would not have been close if Comey had reported he was investigating the Trump campaign.
SunSeeker
Jun 2017
#56
Correct...but those anemic favorability ratings are still all about misogyny and media bias
BeyondGeography
Jun 2017
#54
It was. And we had a chair who went to the NY times and insulted millennials for no good reason
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2017
#107
Where was all this consternation when other individuals were attacking the DNC outright?
JHan
Jun 2017
#79
If anyone else used the exact same words as HRC, they'd be lauded for trying to advance the DNC.
Bleacher Creature
Jun 2017
#103
Everyone from Harry Reid on down seems to agree on, DWS was "Worthless" as DNC chair. His words.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2017
#105