Latest Breaking News

mountain grammy

(28,679 posts)

32. +1

Reply to justhanginon (Reply #4)

Mon Jun 26, 2017, 11:19 PM

Jun 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court will hear case of Colorado baker who refused to make wedding cake for same-sex couple [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2017 OP

So this brings back racial segregation greymattermom Jun 2017 #1

K&R uppityperson Jun 2017 #2

Of course, as long as they're rich, white and Christian. mountain grammy Jun 2017 #3

Perhaps the Masterpiece Bake Shop could call God as a witness justhanginon Jun 2017 #4

I believe you have gotten to the crux of the matter rurallib Jun 2017 #17

+1 mountain grammy Jun 2017 #32

Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2017 #5

Not good. LS_Editor Jun 2017 #6

SC voted to hear an "appeal"? it's kind of silly IMO-RW-rads to spend $$$$ about words on a cake. Sunlei Jun 2017 #7

The case was brought on the baker's behalf by the "Alliance Defending Freedom" Princess Turandot Jun 2017 #34

betcha pence has a woody,,,mom better watch out dembotoz Jun 2017 #8

Why are RW Christians so afraid of cakes? Coventina Jun 2017 #9

They are being asked to participate christx30 Jun 2017 #18

Sure, let them brand their business as mini churches and discriminate at will, BUT procon Jun 2017 #10

Leviticus is Jewish law. It is not Christian canon law. KWR65 Jun 2017 #12

Seriously? 😕 Do you really want to go down that path and preach procon Jun 2017 #14

Thanks for pointing that out BruceWane Jun 2017 #39

Any legal scholars out there? AJT Jun 2017 #11

I'm not a legal scholar but I did stay at a... MGKrebs Jun 2017 #20

There was a story covered a few years ago christx30 Jun 2017 #22

The examples you cite are distinguishable onenote Jun 2017 #24

Thanks for your interpretation of why the wedding cake is discrimination Freethinker65 Jun 2017 #30

As you are not denying service on grounds of race, sex, religion, or national origin, yes LanternWaste Jun 2017 #23

Nazi skinheads aren't a protected class TexasBushwhacker Jun 2017 #37

Change the fact pattern to a gay graphic designer to help promote geek tragedy Jun 2017 #44

I will make any gay couple their wedding cake adigal Jun 2017 #13

SC to consider whether the 1A's religion clauses allow a bakery to deny service to gay couples mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2017 #15

Seriously, this is what makes it kacekwl Jun 2017 #16

Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch are all shoo in votes for this. lark Jun 2017 #19

I don't think anyone is a shoe in on this one citood Jun 2017 #27

It will be very interesting, at a minimum. lark Jun 2017 #28

Jesus hates gay cakes! He's okay with tarts, though. ;-) WinkyDink Jun 2017 #21

sorry but we no longer make cakes for christians nt msongs Jun 2017 #25

ugh Voltaire2 Jun 2017 #26

The cake case, writes @smencimer, is custom-made for Justice Gorsuch: mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2017 #29

I'm really surprised they wanted to deal with this jgmiller Jun 2017 #31

You can put up a sign saying you reserve the right to refuse service for any reason, but onenote Jun 2017 #36

I'm afraid of this case going to the SC. mountain grammy Jun 2017 #33

No, they will not rule on the constitutionality of the Colorado law as a whole onenote Jun 2017 #35

I'm sure they did. But they also reported the offending baker TexasBushwhacker Jun 2017 #38

fuck these homophobes Skittles Jun 2017 #40

Poor Jack the baker. He probably can't sleep at night worrying that the friend Vinca Jun 2017 #41

This could backfire on the fundies big time. I hope it does. Initech Jun 2017 #42

Like it or not, there is a legitimate 1st Amendment issue here. geek tragedy Jun 2017 #43

I Agree RobinA Jun 2017 #45