Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds like Linda's still pissed the Dems backed Harris and not her sister for the Senate seat. VermontKevin Oct 2017 #1
That is exactly what it is. still_one Oct 2017 #8
Thanks for enlightening me/us! I had no idea... TheDebbieDee Oct 2017 #31
Loretta had no name recognition outside of xxqqqzme Oct 2017 #74
Absolutely, lots of bad feelings there. redstatebluegirl Oct 2017 #76
I didn't realize that Loretta was Linda's sister. I think you have a point there. George II Oct 2017 #80
Yes. We need new people, new leadership. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #2
Totally agree. Owl Oct 2017 #19
Agreed Catch2.2 Oct 2017 #22
Her peers in the house make this decision. Why do you think they keep her as leader? (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #48
Because her fundraising keeps them in office? shanny Oct 2017 #60
No, it's because she can count and understands that politics are local. haele Oct 2017 #69
+1 Agree happy feet Oct 2017 #70
Oh please, it seems like you don't even get what her job is. bettyellen Oct 2017 #77
So you think she raises money that is funneled only to their campaigns? ehrnst Oct 2017 #83
New Leadership that has been destroying them delisen Oct 2017 #39
So how exactly is the Republican party being destroyed? I seem to have missed something. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #98
Why is it that some people here cling to the idea that the House Minority Leader should do the job Hekate Oct 2017 #116
Your response is to a post that doesn't address the House Minority Leader. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #118
Like Mitch McConnell? delisen Oct 2017 #41
I'm with you. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #81
People have to prove themselves for leadership positions ehrnst Oct 2017 #85
If only Sanchez had some way to voice this through internal channels Blue_Tires Oct 2017 #97
Totally agree left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #104
Leadership is earned. Nothing stopping anyone else from stepping up, is there? AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #3
I agree. Nancy is still working hard and succeeding. Why would anyone want to replace their The Wielding Truth Oct 2017 #6
"New leadership will rise out of accomplishments and not out of the need to push out the leader." Plucketeer Oct 2017 #96
Just as long as they sport Plucketeer Oct 2017 #7
That's the advantage of being a Democrat, isn't it? ehrnst Oct 2017 #86
urm.....yeah, actually there is NJCher Oct 2017 #11
I TOTALLY agree Raine Oct 2017 #20
Same old what? (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #88
What do you mean by "popular candidate?" ehrnst Oct 2017 #87
Yes, others are stopped from stepping up. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #25
How is Nancy blocking it? I'm genuinely curious. JHan Oct 2017 #28
Pelosi is simply staying in place. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #32
Pelosi is actually quite progressive JHan Oct 2017 #34
It's amazing that people still don't understand lapucelle Oct 2017 #44
Thx Lapucelle...There's often confusion about what the job entails. JHan Oct 2017 #57
Yep. Oglethorpe's "real" progressives (!) are being suckered into trying to take out Hortensis Oct 2017 #67
yep ++++ JHan Oct 2017 #68
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #94
"True" progressive-is like "real" christian? delisen Oct 2017 #40
it's up to Pelosi, her constituents and her peers in the House. ehrnst Oct 2017 #46
Why Shouldn't She Stay In Place If She Wants To? Me. Oct 2017 #64
She is elected to that position by her peers in the House. ehrnst Oct 2017 #89
In my view, new leaders need to be materially better, not simply younger. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #61
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Me. Oct 2017 #65
"are stopped from stepping up." ehrnst Oct 2017 #92
Wish Sanchez would say more zentrum Oct 2017 #4
Probably a reference to Pelosi's "deal" with Trump re the DREAMERs/DACA alp227 Oct 2017 #9
Why were they "apparent Bernie backers"? They were supposedly DACA folks. 7962 Oct 2017 #14
Didn't Erika Andiola cheer on the protest? lapucelle Oct 2017 #43
Not s surprise, whoever she is. Apparently she's "undocumented", according to her Twitter. 7962 Oct 2017 #45
I think it's best to ask the people affected lapucelle Oct 2017 #49
I agree. I don't get it either. Its not like she was AGAINST them. 7962 Oct 2017 #50
Pelosi is probably the most successful leader of the House lapucelle Oct 2017 #58
But they're not getting elected. D's have lost seats, state & national, regardless of fundraising. 7962 Oct 2017 #62
Odd moments? Forgets? Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #71
you know who blows those moments out of proportion right? JHan Oct 2017 #75
"reverse the losses over the past 7 years"? A little history about the 2016 election... George II Oct 2017 #78
They also lost the House and lost the Senate. 7962 Oct 2017 #100
That was several years ago - we reversed that trend (i.e., GAINED seats) last year. George II Oct 2017 #101
Losing 49 & then gaining 5 is a shitty day in Vegas. 7962 Oct 2017 #102
We will NEVER overturn those elections from five or seven years ago, they're history. I prefer.... George II Oct 2017 #103
I only ever hear this about older women, never men and usually from Republicans. ehrnst Oct 2017 #84
It's a disturbing trend. You're not the only one who's noticed. NurseJackie Oct 2017 #95
You must not have listened to the hardliners talk about McCain in '08 then. 7962 Oct 2017 #99
Please tell me who the "hardliners" are you are referring to. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #105
The RWers who think McCain is a raging liberal. They're not hard to find 7962 Oct 2017 #106
Which Democratic sites? ehrnst Oct 2017 #107
Where were you in '08? Here are 3 links to articles on it 7962 Oct 2017 #108
CNN and NYT are "Democratic sites?" ehrnst Oct 2017 #109
There are hundreds of posts here about him & his age. Again, just do a search. 7962 Oct 2017 #110
There were many posts about McCain's actual health ehrnst Oct 2017 #112
Its also dangereous to get between Shumer & a camera! 7962 Oct 2017 #113
Yep Hekate Oct 2017 #117
Sour Grapism Me. Oct 2017 #5
Ah yes. JNelson6563 Oct 2017 #10
Unlikely, but POSSIBLE! Podkayne K Oct 2017 #12
Check is in the mail. Jakes Progress Oct 2017 #13
Everything is fine. Nothing to see here. Move along. ZX86 Oct 2017 #15
Nancy has More Balls than any other Democrat in Congress Loyd Oct 2017 #16
Does she? bathroommonkey76 Oct 2017 #17
Realism Loyd Oct 2017 #38
Post removed Post removed Oct 2017 #59
She's a brilliant woman and she's doing a fantastic job. I trust her... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #79
Exactly. Reminds me of "repeal & replace" when Obama was still in office. 7962 Oct 2017 #63
She's saying that there needs to be a legal case in place prior to impeachment. ehrnst Oct 2017 #90
No. If it isn't broken, don't fix it. Lil Missy Oct 2017 #18
It is broke Catch2.2 Oct 2017 #23
There is THAT, indeed. nt Purveyor Oct 2017 #26
Yeah. Forget about gerrymandering, election fraud, vote suppression, and collusion with foreign governments. NYC Liberal Oct 2017 #29
If Pelosi is too weak to step up to it and do some real damage to republicans, then it is ansible Oct 2017 #33
It's not broken - it would be MUCH WORSE without her. Lil Missy Oct 2017 #36
Oh, that's funny BeyondGeography Oct 2017 #56
Because Pelosi? She's responsible for Governors? And local districts? ehrnst Oct 2017 #91
How about a big NOPE? ellie Oct 2017 #21
I posted this on another thread today; I'll repeat it here: NBachers Oct 2017 #24
Uh, no. leftofcool Oct 2017 #27
Commanding "Get out of my way!" ain't the hard work of winning a leadership position. CBHagman Oct 2017 #30
A lot of attacks against the "old generation" lately. Willie Pep Oct 2017 #115
Repukes FURIOUSLY hate Nancy for some reason. Let's keep her. truthisfreedom Oct 2017 #35
I'm sure they'd be just polite as hell with any replacement...... 7962 Oct 2017 #73
They hated Obama for the same reason - he was good at his job. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #93
Hawaiian Gardens is in her district ucrdem Oct 2017 #37
I you can't compete and win make delisen Oct 2017 #42
Yeah, because party infighting is such a unifying force. hamsterjill Oct 2017 #47
It's not up to Sanchez, fortunately. PubliusEnigma Oct 2017 #51
Even if she thinks that she needs to keep her mouth shut joeybee12 Oct 2017 #52
+1000 Blue_Tires Oct 2017 #114
If the Senate had passed Pelosis health care bill, then we would not be facing these ACA issues now LonePirate Oct 2017 #53
These are not times to be divisive in the Democratic Party. democratisphere Oct 2017 #54
who the hell is sanchez and fuck her... samnsara Oct 2017 #55
Republicans wish Ds would stay away from Donalds cage. Sunlei Oct 2017 #66
After Tim Ryan pretty much removed himself for future consideration by lapucelle Oct 2017 #72
I think it is time for gerrymandering to go. (eom) StevieM Oct 2017 #82
I would like to see some new Democratic leadership Skittles Oct 2017 #111
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Democrat Sanchez: '...»Reply #81