Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

onenote

(46,204 posts)

6. please describe these many dumbass decisions.

Reply to Liberalagogo (Reply #5)

Thu Oct 19, 2017, 10:12 AM

Oct 2017

And for good measure, explain why he would be wrong to find that there is no standing in this case (and why on the other hand it was right for all the birther suits to be dismissed on standing grounds)?

This lawsuit was always a hail mary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawsuit says Trump's ownership of hotels violates the constitution [View all] Judi Lynn Oct 2017 OP

Of course it is... Maxheader Oct 2017 #1

Just hope this judge isn't a RR. lark Oct 2017 #2

Clinton appointee... Liberalagogo Oct 2017 #5

please describe these many dumbass decisions. onenote Oct 2017 #6

Don't forget Trump is charging the Secret Service to protect him Angry Dragon Oct 2017 #3

Prior DU LBN discussion on this issue here... PoliticAverse Oct 2017 #4

I'm mad as hell... Identityless Oct 2017 #7