Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,973 posts)
35. How so?
Tue Feb 27, 2018, 01:11 PM
Feb 2018

WRT rifles, it bans those that take detachable mags and have 1 of 6 "evil" features. It also bans semi-auto rifles with a fixed magazine capacity of more than 10 rounds, excepting .22 rimires. That's far from all semi-auto rifles.

WRT to pistols, it bans those that take detachable magazines and have a feature like a threaded barrel, barrel, shroud, second pistol grip, etc. Very far from all semi auto-pistols.

Obviously, that's a gross simplification. It also bans, and exempts, a number of firearms by name, among other things, but I can't see how it can be fairly characterized as banning all semi-autos.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. Make them vote against it. Maven Feb 2018 #1
Agree iluvtennis Feb 2018 #11
Concur MosheFeingold Feb 2018 #25
Smart move by the dems SummerSnow Feb 2018 #66
The Republicans will not allow it to come up for debate. This is why we must retake congress. olegramps Feb 2018 #67
Maybe Democrats are finally learning something. yurbud Mar 2018 #86
This one is broader than the last one, too. samir.g Feb 2018 #2
but but but Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2018 #3
Thats so they can justify it under the commerce clause 47of74 Feb 2018 #64
I don't think the Dems can shame them into voting against banning assault weapons. I just saw, on napi21 Feb 2018 #4
How the hell can you The Mouth Feb 2018 #43
:) (Hi, Napi21.) Don't forget authoritarian duty. Hortensis Mar 2018 #76
Point! The Mouth Mar 2018 #82
This is just as bad as the Franken pile-on. appal_jack Feb 2018 #5
Same RW Neoliberal Military Industrial Free Market Crap TomCADem Feb 2018 #23
The neoliberals are quite happy with gun confiscation. appal_jack Feb 2018 #37
I Dunno. Attacking Gun Control Because, You Know, Freedom... TomCADem Feb 2018 #62
the Second Amendment is not God-given. cvoogt Feb 2018 #27
Did my post mention God? nt appal_jack Feb 2018 #38
Did I say your post mentioned God? cvoogt Feb 2018 #45
At the very least... liberalmuse Feb 2018 #29
The 1st Amendment is limited by common sense and decency. If you go TOO far in your freedom of vkkv Feb 2018 #31
I get that you are hostile to the notion of any rights being fundamental and inalienable. nt appal_jack Feb 2018 #39
No more and no less than you are hostile to nuance. LanternWaste Feb 2018 #42
Nope, Wrong AGAIN Jack! vkkv Feb 2018 #50
It's a moving forward ban. No one is suggesting rounding up existing ones. harun Feb 2018 #32
Read the proposed bill. It bans "possession." nt appal_jack Feb 2018 #40
Are you sure? sl8 Feb 2018 #41
I seem to have been mistaken. appal_jack Feb 2018 #46
No problem. sl8 Feb 2018 #47
Individual liberty to shoot up kids at school? steve2470 Feb 2018 #54
Nice straw man you are attacking there. appal_jack Feb 2018 #60
The NRA is quite clear that they are OK with child gun murders. Dave Starsky Mar 2018 #88
I agree. Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #57
Oh. ChazInAz Feb 2018 #63
Had a ban until 2004 . It would of helped a lot if it wasn't allowed to expire imo lunasun Feb 2018 #6
Dems must show courage. The recent youth movement won't wait oasis Feb 2018 #7
If Dems let the GOP bury it they have it as a campiagn issue BigmanPigman Feb 2018 #8
This bill bans all semi automatic pistols and rifles. Calista241 Feb 2018 #9
Personally, I think this will hurt Democrats in the elections The Mouth Feb 2018 #24
How so? sl8 Feb 2018 #35
Can you name a semi-auto pistol that does not use detachable magazines? appal_jack Feb 2018 #49
Not all rifles with detachable magazines are banned, just the ones that also have 1 "evil" feature. sl8 Feb 2018 #51
Thanks for ferreting-out further details. appal_jack Feb 2018 #61
So, in other words it doesn't actually ban assault rifles. dingosatemyusername Mar 2018 #68
No "assault weapons" ban has ever banned real assault rifles. ManiacJoe Mar 2018 #89
How? DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2018 #80
Thanks for the info. sl8 Mar 2018 #81
Any candidates with an F rating from the NRA Weed Man Mar 2018 #70
Really fucking annoys me to read about 'Bans' without the clarification of 'sales of' ... mr_lebowski Feb 2018 #10
And many of the current owners will be over joyed if this passes as their weapons will skyrocket.. EX500rider Feb 2018 #12
The price will be zero if it's illegal to ever sell it samir.g Feb 2018 #28
Right, cause illegal weapons are free now, right? lol EX500rider Feb 2018 #58
Not if we set up an Australian-style buyback program Weed Man Mar 2018 #71
And how many semi-automatic rifles would you think there are and the avg retail value? EX500rider Mar 2018 #74
Enough to melt it down to a Statute of Liberty size at least 100x Weed Man Mar 2018 #75
It's all about the math..$$$ EX500rider Mar 2018 #77
How many of that 300 million are semi-automatic rifles? SunSeeker Mar 2018 #84
"unlawful for a person to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess, in or affecting" AtheistCrusader Feb 2018 #19
Well, see ... I was unclear about what it meant ... mr_lebowski Feb 2018 #30
That's why I'm all for the gun buyback program at 125% of market value Weed Man Mar 2018 #73
That's not nearly enough money DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2018 #78
Are you sure? sl8 Feb 2018 #44
Missed that. AtheistCrusader Feb 2018 #48
So, selling within a state is permitted? JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2018 #55
Another poster pointed out I missed a second clause that exempts currently held AtheistCrusader Feb 2018 #56
And why do you need this many guns? Weed Man Mar 2018 #72
Well, if you knew anything about guns, you might know the answer to that question. AtheistCrusader Mar 2018 #79
You are not alone. harun Feb 2018 #34
This Is Not Going To Go Anywhere SoCalMusicLover Feb 2018 #13
True but at least their making a STAND against the NRA instead of hand wringing.... Bengus81 Feb 2018 #18
Here is the text of the bill (PDF link) BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #14
I wonder how many lawyers' billable hours went into that text. JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2018 #21
Well they apparently used the "freebie" list from last year's iteration of the bill. BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #22
I guess it's not that much money, as long as they're recycling ... JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2018 #53
google the history.... noneof_theabove Feb 2018 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2018 #33
Holy sh*t! Theres explosive material in a .223 case?! Marengo Mar 2018 #87
THANK YOU DEMS!!! You made my day. NOW let all Republicans vote AGAINST this for the World to see... Bengus81 Feb 2018 #16
Get the Rs on record opposing it mcar Feb 2018 #17
Let the rightys Maxheader Feb 2018 #20
How do you imagine you might die? What do you mean by safeguard, and whats so risky about... Marengo Feb 2018 #65
Don't you always ask for more than cilla4progress Feb 2018 #26
This Republican is willing True Blue American Feb 2018 #36
Go Dems shenmue Feb 2018 #52
K! Cha Feb 2018 #59
The bill will be passed Weed Man Mar 2018 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author James48 Mar 2018 #83
Agreed madville Mar 2018 #85
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems introduce bill banni...»Reply #35