Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Denmark bans wearing the burqa in public [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)325. it can be compared as to the regulation of clothing, however
In the end, that is what the issue is. Should the government regulate clothing?
And if based on motive of oppression of women with religion, then that zeal should extend to nuns as well.
Then would you protect the burqa if it only applied to a few Muslim women who went through a convent like procedure to put them in a small category who would wear it?
Or protect a Catholic Order that came up with a face-covering get-up for its nuns?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
386 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It will harm women more than help them. RW Islamophobes are rejoicing.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#75
You are saying the husbands will forbid women from leaving their homes. You admit
Doodley
Jun 2018
#270
The majority male Danish Paliament (63%). I looked it up before I posted.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2018
#174
In a western country with any sort of freedom such laws against wearing a burqa should not exist.
Demsrule86
May 2018
#112
Nope. I looked it up before I posted that. 37% women in 2017, down from a high of 39%
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2018
#173
"wouldn't allow people to require others ...". Your post takes away women's rights.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#7
You want different law. Yes. Let's stop men telling women what not to wear and what to wear.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#11
The law takes away the right of men to force women to wear those hot, uncomfortable
pnwmom
May 2018
#18
No. Does not. It FINES the WOMAN 134 Euros. Read the OP again. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#20
The Euros will come from the pocket of the man who is forcing the woman to hide herself. nt
pnwmom
May 2018
#25
Now you are starting to get it. Punish the man, not the woman. Limit the perp, not the victim.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#35
You presume & hope. But the better law would directly address the coercion & not take women's rights
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#43
No. I have written the opposite. Don't attempt to stuff words in my mouth. It not honorable debating
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#45
"nothing"? Reread what I wrote. Better laws go after the coercive men. The coercion is the problem.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#46
What would this better law be that would go after the men? How would it be enforced? n/t
pnwmom
May 2018
#59
It would have to make police act on every complaint & investigate any allegation of coercion.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#80
And what woman coerced to wear these things would be brave enough to make an allegation?
pnwmom
May 2018
#84
Banning the public wearing of these things supports women who'd rather not wear them.
pnwmom
May 2018
#94
On the surface it supports them. In practice it will harm & restrict more than it supports.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#100
No, the law allows for wearing things over the face because of weather conditions. n/t
pnwmom
May 2018
#42
Unfortunately, in Denmark and pretty much everywhere else, ... most likely a man. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#87
So basically you think the Danes should allow men to dehumanize their women,
GulfCoast66
May 2018
#142
No. And no. Take an aspirin and reread when you are feeling more capable. Duh. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2018
#154
That is your take. What gives you the right to decide about other people's religion?
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#158
You falsely presume my experience. I too have encountered people wearing burkas. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#21
You being unnerved is not sufficient reason to deny a woman the right to wear all-covering clothing.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#36
I'm not covinced any would choose except exceedingly few. But it is their right.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#41
The "rule" went away quite a while ago, unless you're someone like Melania and Ivanka,
pnwmom
May 2018
#71
Some women choose the veil. What will happen is women in countries who do this won't be allowed out.
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#157
You don't strengthen women's rights by legislating away those rights.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#50
Nope. I'm telling the predominantly male Danish Parliament they should stop.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#83
Female headcoverings have nothing to do with women's choice - but furthering male domination
dbackjon
May 2018
#90
I also support this. In Europe/America world Muslim men dress like westerners.
Coventina
May 2018
#14
Men telling women what not to wear is misogny. So is men telling women what to wear. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#23
This isn't about annoying Muslims. Millions of Muslim women wear western clothing.
Coventina
Jun 2018
#241
Then we would no longer be living in a free society and I would flee to one that was.
Coventina
Jun 2018
#252
Your comparisons are way off. Telephones enable a limited form of communication
Coventina
Jun 2018
#285
But facial expression IS required to understand meaning. Ask ANY psychologist.
Coventina
Jun 2018
#299
I find your comment horrifying... what you suggest would not create any sort of free society...
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#338
Well, I find your attitude horrifying, that it is OK to normalize a garment that does nothing
Coventina
Jun 2018
#342
I stated elsewhere in the thread that exceptions should be made for weather and health conditions.
Coventina
Jun 2018
#253
Exactly right...the husband or father forces the women to wear the burqa or they sit home...
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#159
But it isn't. There is no religious requirement in Islam to wear these face-covering, dehumanizing
Squinch
May 2018
#131
You don't have the right to tell others how to live or what to believe...freedom means
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#336
You can't wear a mask. Unless you're a cop, then your balaclava is fine.
JustABozoOnThisBus
May 2018
#57
does the koran demand women wear those things? if not, it is not islamophobia nt
msongs
May 2018
#31
How? It isn't a requirement of Islam. And others, like Elizabeth Smart's captors,
pnwmom
May 2018
#38
No, it's designed to ensure that women aren't made invisible in the public sphere. n/t
pnwmom
May 2018
#95
It is a fact that the burka makes the wearer invisible, even to family members and friends
pnwmom
Jun 2018
#272
It is a requirement of Islam to cover ones self. And by what right do you or I tell someone how to
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#168
I think people often confuse hijab with niqab or burka, and they think we are objecting
Squinch
May 2018
#76
So if Trump proposed barring any woman wearing a burqua from immigrating to the US
onenote
May 2018
#143
I have seen Burqas...that is not the point. It is call freedom...you ever see
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#169
None of these things you are referring to covers the face like a burka. Neither do the headscarves
Squinch
Jun 2018
#194
Actually not true...France banned the hijab...and in the end so will Denmark no doubt becaue this is
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#205
Well, you need to take that up with the French. It's their history and their culture you're
Coventina
Jun 2018
#346
I am pointing out the hypocrisy of so called 'western democracies' and their what I consider a war
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#350
It is Islamaphobia ...all of it. No so called free country has any business fining women for
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#335
If you can see the person's face and are able to interact with facial expressions
Coventina
Jun 2018
#264
But there are cultural practices that we simply will not tolerate in our country, like
Squinch
May 2018
#78
What about the Hasid? You want to talk about mistreatment of women...But it seems
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#163
They are out and about aren't they? Without the Burqa, they won't be allowed out.
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#202
No one is objecting to the hijab, though. The objection is to the garments that cover the face.
Squinch
Jun 2018
#218
One thing you may want to consider ... this law DOES give women the excuse to tell their oppressors
mr_lebowski
Jun 2018
#385
And with the long history of European abuse of women, it seems hypocritical to me.
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#170
Thanks! I don't see how anyone can support such an obvious blow to personal freedom which will only
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#198
So we should continue and condone the cultural oppression of women because oppression of women
Squinch
Jun 2018
#196
I believe in freedom of religion...also why single out the Muslim religion...you want to see some
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#197
That is your opinion. By what right do you claim... which entitles you to decide for everyone?
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#204
The same right that allows me to decide slavery is wrong, wife-beating is wrong and
Squinch
Jun 2018
#209
Freedom of religion is a constitutional right in the United States thank God.
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#345
Some mormons still live that way...they simply don't have state marriages and are left alone...but
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#331
I should add that banning the burqa will not stop the cultural oppression of women. It will merely
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#199
No it won't. Those men won't suddenly start doing their own grocery shopping and picking their
Squinch
Jun 2018
#201
Believe me in a highly religious house...women will become prisoners without the Burqa.
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#203
No I'm not. I've met many of the men who require this of their wives. They'll adapt.
Squinch
Jun 2018
#206
That's the same as asking who are we to decide that any oppression is worth fighting.
Squinch
May 2018
#106
Are we wrong to prohibit female genital mutilation in this country? Even if we don't
Squinch
May 2018
#108
Are you equating circumcision with female genital mutilation? If so, we have nothing
Squinch
May 2018
#111
Still not answering. But the obvious answer is that of course it is right to prohibit FGM.
Squinch
May 2018
#121
Aaaand we're back to the beginning. The burka has nothing whatsoever to do with religion.
Squinch
May 2018
#128
I can see what the clothing does. Just as we can determine that mutilating women is wrong,
Squinch
May 2018
#133
But then if you want to outlaw it due to the subjugation motive you see behind it
treestar
Jun 2018
#319
There is a huge difference in telling women how they can dress and fining said women....than
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#165
Claretian veils don't cover the face. You do know the difference between a burka and a hijab, right?
Squinch
Jun 2018
#248
The law is specifically about burkas, which cover the face. Nun's habits don't do that.
Squinch
May 2018
#136
Not a fair comparison. A hijab that covers the face - you don't know if it is a
Doodley
Jun 2018
#269
A hijab does NOT cover the face. A burka (which is what is being banned) and a niqab do.
Squinch
Jun 2018
#318
It has nothing to do with the religion. There is no Islamic rule that requires a burka.
Squinch
Jun 2018
#185
I always wonder about the lives of those women. They're in medical school wearing western
Squinch
May 2018
#89
If there is abuse, it can be found like it was for the Amish or the followers of Warren Jeffs
treestar
Jun 2018
#302
so you believe that any dress requirements that Muslim women obey should be illegal?
onenote
Jun 2018
#155
No one in this thread has voiced any objection to any garment but the dehumanizing
Squinch
Jun 2018
#195
No, they are not forced the same way. You need to do more reading on the Amish and Mennonites.
Coventina
Jun 2018
#305
Funny that on DU we semi regularly have threads where some members criticize western natiions
GulfCoast66
May 2018
#145
I suspect the individual circumstances boil down to whether one has ever actually
Squinch
Jun 2018
#186
It astounds me that Liberals can find any justiification to interfere with one of our most important
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#215
Maybe they do and maybe they don't. But it is not our job to ban and item of clothing just in case.
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#340
I am against the Burqa and against lots of things people say...but I would not restrict free speech.
Demsrule86
Jun 2018
#216
As a non-religious woman I applaud this tiny crack in the wall of patriarchy nt
SylviaD
Jun 2018
#259
Time to stop treating women like possessions that should be hidden and subservient to
Doodley
Jun 2018
#267