Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
24. The difference is Obama was not at odds with Kerry
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 04:07 PM
Aug 2012

And I doubt he had to be told to whole heartedly endorse Kerry. I believe in inspecting what you expect.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

lol.. He should hand him a speech to vett and then throw it out. . . .n/t annabanana Aug 2012 #1
I was thinking he should pull an Elvis Costello... corkhead Aug 2012 #12
So I guess that means Rmoney has reviewed the remarks of the other speakers as well? tridim Aug 2012 #2
nice one.... no excuses.... trailmonkee Aug 2012 #6
Of course he has! Because the same speech writers wrote all their speeches.... progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #19
Yep oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #31
I don't blame Paul. no_hypocrisy Aug 2012 #3
except for gays, blacks, latinos and women, yeah big tent all the way TeamPooka Aug 2012 #30
Your list is too short oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #32
i'll add atheists. nt awoke_in_2003 Aug 2012 #34
amen! defacto7 Aug 2012 #37
It's quicker to just say who's alllowed: TeamPooka Aug 2012 #36
Not Really oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #38
Bam! SunSeeker Aug 2012 #47
That is awful Botany Aug 2012 #4
Wouldn't it be more fun oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #39
That's what happens when you're principled. truthisfreedom Aug 2012 #5
Yeah, he's really principled when it comes to his ego. Libertarianism? No so much. SunSeeker Aug 2012 #48
LOL - some of all this Repub fracturing is a hilarious sideshow. pinto Aug 2012 #7
Interesting turn of events. KaryninMiami Aug 2012 #8
Hah! 'I don’t fully endorse him for president.' Nice weaseling, Ronnie. freshwest Aug 2012 #9
Not a RP fan, Jamaal510 Aug 2012 #10
Yep. Glad he's not in the running but the RNC's behaviour's pretty vile. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #29
Rebuplican's nature is to try to control everything CanonRay Aug 2012 #11
Haha! Suddenly, they think being "uncompromising" is a bad thing arcane1 Aug 2012 #13
it shows Romney's insecurity evilhime Aug 2012 #14
rats are chewing on each other - keep it up! wordpix Aug 2012 #15
Was wondering about that tama Aug 2012 #16
Why do Republicans HATE democracy? Berlum Aug 2012 #17
GOP never advocates for Democracy or Free Speach. harun Aug 2012 #46
Kerry reviewed and edited Obama's speech at convention. northoftheborder Aug 2012 #18
The difference is Obama was not at odds with Kerry Heather MC Aug 2012 #24
Was Obama running against Kerry in the '04 primary? Scootaloo Aug 2012 #28
Commander Monkey Pancakes.... Aviation Pro Aug 2012 #20
GOP reap whirlwind they sowed: they polarized USA, now their own party is polarized. nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2012 #21
Ron Paul won Iowa!!! Heather MC Aug 2012 #22
Follows Romney's control freakishness - like this last week in New Mexico when he told local sad sally Aug 2012 #23
It wouldn't surprise me Bohunk68 Aug 2012 #25
Let's start with the Bob Casey in '92 analogies bluestateguy Aug 2012 #26
This could in some ways help Barack Obama's chances, at least in "purple" areas. BlueMTexpat Aug 2012 #27
What's a "liberty message" when... Amonester Aug 2012 #33
It's the Mormon church who wants to approve Paul's speech they are very scripted. bushisanidiot Aug 2012 #35
In All Seriousness oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #40
"At times voting en-block with the Democrats" hootinholler Aug 2012 #41
I don't Remember oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #43
Kabuki theater. I have a batch of DVD movies to watch this week. nt SDjack Aug 2012 #42
and that it include an endorsement without hesitation or reservation. Caeser67 Aug 2012 #44
It's smart to have final control over the speech Blue_Tires Aug 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ron Paul declines a speak...»Reply #24