Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,208 posts)
23. It's stupefyingly stupid.
Tue Jun 26, 2018, 08:42 PM
Jun 2018

He decries the Special Counsel investigation as inserting partisanship into the process when, in fact, the Special Counsel was selected specifically to avoid partisanship that would be inherent if the investigation was left in the hands of the DOJ of the administration that allegedly benefitted from (and possibly was a participant in) the election interference being investigated.

And a "bipartisan" commission is a singularly bad idea. By its very nature it blesses a partisan approach, with each side reaching their own conclusions as to whether there is probable cause that crimes have been committed and then leaving the decision as to whether to proceed in the hands of the DOJ that is going to be associated with one of the parties.

I know that judges sometimes like to get on a soapbox, but this was a major swing and a miss.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

At least there's some good news today. - n/t Jim__ Jun 2018 #1
GOOD. nt Leghorn21 Jun 2018 #2
Ha! DUers wanted this judge impeached, based on the hearing jberryhill Jun 2018 #3
When did DUers want this judge impeached? ehrnst Jun 2018 #4
I didn't hear it either More_Cowbell Jun 2018 #5
Link please. nt USALiberal Jun 2018 #6
I remember the thread canetoad Jun 2018 #9
Sure, here are several jberryhill Jun 2018 #11
LOL, a little touchy today? Don't take it so personal. nt USALiberal Jun 2018 #16
You're welcome jberryhill Jun 2018 #17
This will make you feel all better jberryhill Jun 2018 #18
I remember the threads too. And here's the thing GusBob Jun 2018 #21
At least... tonedevil Jun 2018 #20
I recall that... IthinkThereforeIAM Jun 2018 #8
That's what I thought SonofDonald Jun 2018 #12
Grilling side that has leading edge in judge's mind makes the decision more resistant to reversal Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2018 #13
I was just about to post about that and how you were the voice of experience onenote Jun 2018 #14
This, plus GusBob Jun 2018 #22
This is the reason I love DU! lunatica Jun 2018 #26
Trial begins in one month OldManTarHeel Jun 2018 #7
After the ruling by the DC judge, I expected this ruling Gothmog Jun 2018 #10
His last paragraph is nauseating jberryhill Jun 2018 #15
It's stupefyingly stupid. onenote Jun 2018 #23
It's as if he doesn't know what his job is jberryhill Jun 2018 #24
You know who's going to be the most angry about this? TrollBuster9090 Jun 2018 #19
It's a weird little thing at the end jberryhill Jun 2018 #25
Manafort must be under a death warrant from Putin; seems to prefer jail time to cooperating. lagomorph777 Jun 2018 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Virginia judge rules agai...»Reply #23