Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

erronis

(22,492 posts)

9. Meridith Publishing? Couldn't be....

Reply to laserhaas (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2018, 05:21 PM

Nov 2018

They are the purveyors of tons of "self-help", "family", "women's" magazines. Why would they not want to have transparency and fairness, especially with their political/monopolistic tendencies?

Boycotts work wonders, especially for "fluff" stuff.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Department Requires Six Broadcast Television Companies to Terminate - Refrain From Unlawful [View all] laserhaas Nov 2018 OP

Could this be about price-fixing, I wonder? n/t pnwmom Nov 2018 #1

Sounds like it. elleng Nov 2018 #2

I find it specious that Clear Channel/ iHeart is not mentioned laserhaas Nov 2018 #3

This suit is referencing - "six broadcast television companies" BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #4

Okay, I guess you are correct. laserhaas Nov 2018 #5

Yeah I had to re-read it myself after I saw the company names BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #6

Is Clear Channel involved in television? rurallib Nov 2018 #8

You might be correct. laserhaas Nov 2018 #10

CC/iHeart divested their TV interests years ago. mwooldri Nov 2018 #12

So, they were colluding against advertisers? RussBLib Nov 2018 #7

Meridith Publishing? Couldn't be.... erronis Nov 2018 #9

Sinclair Broadcasting. The spreading American cancer. n/t ffr Nov 2018 #11