Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
Thu Apr 11, 2019, 07:31 PM Apr 2019

Chicago sues 'Empire' actor Jussie Smollett over costs of police work despite dismissal of charges [View all]

Source: Chicago Tribune

Outgoing Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s administration says it went to court Thursday to try to force Jussie Smollett to pay Chicago back for an alleged hate crime hoax even though Cook County prosecutors dropped all charges against the “Empire” actor.

The lawsuit, filed in Circuit Court, comes after Smollett failed to pony up for the costs of the police investigation by a deadline imposed by the city. The city said he owes $130,106 — the cost of the police overtime hours expended in the investigation into his allegations.

The upcoming battle in civil court promises in many ways to mirror the criminal charges against Smollett that were abruptly dismissed by prosecutors last month. Both center on the same question: Did Smollett stage a physical assault on himself, claiming his attackers shouted racial and homophobic slurs?

Celebrity attorney Mark Geragos, who represents Smollett, has previously vowed a vigorous defense, warning that Emanuel, police Superintendent Eddie Johnson and other key players would be required to give sworn testimony.

Read more: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-jussie-smollett-city-lawsuit-20190409-story.html



While it is true officials of the city will have to give sworn testimony -- so will Jussie Smollett. To date he has not given any sworn statements.
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The claim is that's just the overtime. Igel Apr 2019 #1
sore losers azureblue Apr 2019 #32
Are you saying that the default position is "the States Attorney knows better"? brooklynite Apr 2019 #33
Yeah. I don't get it. If the police think they have enough evidence...why didn't the AG? LiberalLovinLug Apr 2019 #37
"The upcoming battle in civil court..." also won't happen jberryhill Apr 2019 #2
That's in no small part because lawsuits work in funny ways unblock Apr 2019 #3
Sane people don't fake hate crimes. AKing Apr 2019 #15
Sane people do all kinds of things. jberryhill Apr 2019 #17
He should pay for the cost. I read not that long ago that someone else had to pay restitution.... Honeycombe8 Apr 2019 #4
Perhaps she did. Was she convicted/pled guilty to that? bitterross Apr 2019 #6
Easier, actually. Honeycombe8 Apr 2019 #7
In all likelihood, he'll just pay it jberryhill Apr 2019 #11
How is he liable? This sets a bad standard. bitterross Apr 2019 #5
A Hollywood Actor reporting a hate crime that didn't happen is fraud. forgotmylogin Apr 2019 #8
No one has proved he lied. bitterross Apr 2019 #12
I don't intend to argue... forgotmylogin Apr 2019 #16
Uh, perhaps you missed the point here jberryhill Apr 2019 #18
This is an unusual case. It's one of someone doing something that costs the city. Honeycombe8 Apr 2019 #9
How do you know what he did? bitterross Apr 2019 #14
Good enough for what? jberryhill Apr 2019 #21
He doesn't have to be found guilty of a crime jberryhill Apr 2019 #10
He wasn't sued for the costs of the investigation JonLP24 Apr 2019 #26
What are you talking about? jberryhill Apr 2019 #27
That isn't what OJ was sued for JonLP24 Apr 2019 #29
What an odd digression jberryhill Apr 2019 #30
I know someone can be sued for a crime they were found not guilty obviously JonLP24 Apr 2019 #31
The comparison to OJ is fallacious. clementine613 Apr 2019 #35
"In the Smollett case, there was no crime" jberryhill Apr 2019 #36
I think you misunderstood my point. clementine613 Apr 2019 #38
Oh, okay... jberryhill Apr 2019 #39
Chicago should sue States Attorney Kim Foxx Devil Child Apr 2019 #13
Not at all jberryhill Apr 2019 #19
Good, he should pay Pisces Apr 2019 #20
All this BS from ppl about smollett angrychair Apr 2019 #22
those resources were diverted from there to work his fake case. Baltimike Apr 2019 #23
There is a very simple reason for this lawsuit ripcord Apr 2019 #24
This is ridiculous JonLP24 Apr 2019 #25
You know something exboyfil Apr 2019 #28
Dumb... Blue_Tires Apr 2019 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chicago sues 'Empire' act...