Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Derek Chauvin invokes 5th Amendment and says he will not testify at trial [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)11. You're right... the details are confusing. It seems unnecessary for such an announcement to be made.
I'm no legal expert, but I watch many procedural dramas on TV (so I guess I'm *that* kind of "expert" so I assume that his defense team's intention for him to NOT testify would have been clear from the beginning.
Was this "5th amendment" declaration made in open court, in front of the jury? Was it announced in open court?
Via CNN's Jim Sciutto, Chauvin also emphasized that it was his own decision to not testify at the trial.
The RawStory writer was a bit ambiguous with that statement. Did he make this emphasis "at the trial"? Or did he emphasize privately that he didn't want to testify "at the trial".Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Derek Chauvin invokes 5th Amendment and says he will not testify at trial [View all]
DonViejo
Apr 2021
OP
I understand the idea that the case should be strong enough WITHOUT the defendant's testimony
Rocknation
Apr 2021
#32
I thought defendants either testified or they didn't. Didn't know it required pleading the 5th.
NH Ethylene
Apr 2021
#7
You're right... the details are confusing. It seems unnecessary for such an announcement to be made.
NurseJackie
Apr 2021
#11
That's good thinking... especially if that could have been used as a basis for an appeal.
NurseJackie
Apr 2021
#23
Mind you I am not a lawyer but it seems like he could be subpoenaed to testify in which case he
cstanleytech
Apr 2021
#29
Well Trump should have been convicted as well and we saw how the Republican Senators decided to
cstanleytech
Apr 2021
#31
He's guilty af. Wouldn't an innocent person want to testify to their innocence?
StrictlyRockers
Apr 2021
#12
and his hand in his pocket as if he was trying to increase his center of gravity.
Chakaconcarne
Apr 2021
#44
Considering the quality of his defense team relative to the prosecution, I'm not surprised.
Probatim
Apr 2021
#16
I've watched most of the trial, and Nelson has done a very good job for the defense.
Calista241
Apr 2021
#40
I'd like to know more about the connection chauvin and Mr. Floyd had at a club
Marthe48
Apr 2021
#27
There's a very special legal term for being unable to defend yourself without implicating yourself
Rocknation
Apr 2021
#33
Not an easy look to shake, especially when, like Derek Chauvin, one is guilty as sin.
marble falls
Apr 2021
#38