Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,707 posts)
20. That cuts both ways
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:40 PM
Sep 2021

Let's say you're a hypothetical state that needs to raise $5,000 from a given taxpayer.

It's easier to "sell" to that taxpayer when it's only going to be a net drain of $3500 and the federal government will pick up the rest of the bill.

It's a reasonable question to ask what authority a state legislature ought to have to effectively tax the federal government (or, more precisely, the taxpayers of other states).

It was an easy sell to the republicans who passed it since it hurt comparatively few people and they were mostly in blue states - but that doesn't change the competing priorities.

Consider an alternative plan. Federal tax brackets are somewhat progressive, but they're the same across the country. Meanwhile, $100k for a family of four in a South Carolina suburb is a very different lifestyle than that same income for the same family in San Francisco. Should the federal tax brackets be differentiated by the cost of living where the taxpayer lives?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This Is An Important Reform smb Sep 2021 #1
The SALT cap was a blue state punishment berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #2
It's a cap on tax deductions for rich people. Calista241 Sep 2021 #3
Rich people already pay little to no SALT. berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #4
+1 OneCrazyDiamond Sep 2021 #5
It's a punishment for people in blue states Freddie Sep 2021 #8
It's a cap on the tax deductions of middle class homeowners in blue states . N/T lapucelle Sep 2021 #10
If you pay more than $10k in property tax per year, you are very high up in the middle class Calista241 Sep 2021 #13
The "problem" BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #17
That's not true where I live on Long Island. N/T lapucelle Sep 2021 #23
Because it's a cap on middle class families as well, some of which are barely middle class. There's KPN Sep 2021 #18
First of all TX was one of the biggest victims of the cap. cinematicdiversions Sep 2021 #14
Texas has no state income tax and the state takes more berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #21
TX has almost NJ levels of property taxes. cinematicdiversions Sep 2021 #30
That cuts both ways FBaggins Sep 2021 #20
It's easy to prevent the benefit from being too skewed to the wealthiest... thesquanderer Sep 2021 #6
Or the cap could be based on their income berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #7
THIS BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #9
Get rid of all deductions. twodogsbarking Sep 2021 #11
As a working person who pays plenty of state and federal taxes, no way. We need deductions berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #12
It is true you are taxed twice, but OneCrazyDiamond Sep 2021 #15
Most people easily hit that in MA berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #16
Most people if MA easily hit that? OneCrazyDiamond Sep 2021 #25
Yes. Two people with combined income of 100k berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #27
Two people with a six figure income should pay more taxes. cinematicdiversions Sep 2021 #31
In that scenario I would take the standard deduction. OneCrazyDiamond Sep 2021 #32
In the city of Philadelphia BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #19
You guys don't have a progressive rate? OneCrazyDiamond Sep 2021 #26
Most state income taxes are flat, yes. And you must factor in berni_mccoy Sep 2021 #28
No progressive rates BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #29
I guess the rich will get their tax cut. PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #22
I don't think they will end up with a "full repeal" BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #24
Plus forgiveness of college loans? cinematicdiversions Sep 2021 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Democrats promise '...»Reply #20