Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,790 posts)
34. Manchin slams Biden's 'radical climate agenda' in delay of oil leasing
Mon Mar 13, 2023, 05:07 PM
Mar 2023
The Interior Department says it cannot finish a new offshore plan until December, a delay that has again angered the senator from West Virginia

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/03/08/offshore-oil-drilling-biden-manchin/



HOUSTON — In his latest clash with the White House, Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) sharply criticized the Biden administration Wednesday for delays on a new federal offshore drilling plan that the Interior Department says it needs until December to put into effect. Manchin — an oil industry advocate who has been key to supporting Biden policies in a narrowly divided Congress — has recently pushed back against the administration for its appointments and its implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act, including on how it affects oil and natural gas leasing in Alaska.

In court documents this week, Interior Department officials argue that they need the rest of this year to finish a legally required five-year plan to lease offshore territory for oil and gas development. The plan is months behind deadlines set in law, but in a federal appeals court brief Monday, department officials said they need the extra time to review public comments and complete other legally required analyses on a proposal issued last summer.

Manchin says the delays pose a risk to steady domestic supplies of oil and natural gas. He accused the administration of slow-walking a new plan as part of its push against fossil fuels. He also said the administration was failing to meet legal requirements that every other administration has met to have a new five-year offshore leasing plan in place before the prior plan expired.

“They are putting their radical climate agenda ahead of our nation’s energy security, and they are willing to go to great lengths to do it,” Manchin said in a news release Wednesday. “I will hold their feet to the fire on this.” An Interior Department spokeswoman declined to respond to Manchin’s comments.

snip


Joe Manchin’s ties to Big Oil under renewed scrutiny after chief of staff leaves for job with lobbying group

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/joe-manchin-api-oil-industry-b2261991.html

Joe Manchin’s connections to the oil and gas industry are no secret. The West Virginia senator is among the leading recipients of donations from fossil fuel companies in Congress, and he still has substantial interests in a coal brokerage firm that he co-founded and which is now owned by his son. But those ties are under renewed scrutiny following the announcement on Friday that his chief of staff, Lance West, is leaving his office for the top lobbying job at the American Petroleum Institute, a group that represents oil and gas interests.

“Lance joins API at a critical time for our industry,” API president and chief executive officer Mike Sommers said in a statement, which was reported by Axios. “His position on Capitol Hill placed him at the center of some of our country’s more important legislative debates, and his deep relationships on both sides of the aisle will be a tremendous asset to our organization and the industry we serve,” the statement added.

The move by one of Mr Manchin’s closest advisers has been seized upon as further evidence of the influence of the oil and gas industry on Congress. The Washington Post described it as “[m]ore evidence of the revolving-door phenomenon on Capitol Hill” — a reference to the common practice of lobby groups hiring the staff of politicians that they formerly lobbied, and vice versa.

According to data compiled by OpenSecrets, more than 60 per cent of oil and gas lobbyists working in Washington, DC have previously worked for the federal government in some capacity. Last year, the door swung the other way when Mr Manchin hired a natural gas industry lobbyist, C.J. Osman, from the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, to work on the Senate’s Energy and Natural Resources Committee, of which he is chair.

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

bloomberg... orleans Mar 2023 #1
NYT re environmental impact... ancianita Mar 2023 #3
Well shit. Autumn Mar 2023 #2
Al Gore warns it would be 'recklessly irresponsible' to allow Alaska oil drilling plan Celerity Mar 2023 #17
He is correct G_j Mar 2023 #32
He's right. This negates everything Biden has done with climate change. Autumn Mar 2023 #35
We are not serious about our addiction to oil. Thunderbeast Mar 2023 #4
Thats due to our limited options atm for the power requirements we have here cstanleytech Mar 2023 #15
It is not our addiction to oil. former9thward Mar 2023 #37
Humans are too stupid to avert a catastrophe Mysterian Mar 2023 #60
I pity the later generations... DemocraticPatriot Mar 2023 #47
Great post. hamsterjill Mar 2023 #62
Drill baby drill inwiththenew Mar 2023 #5
Rome will burn, whether Nero accompanies or not. jaxexpat Mar 2023 #6
This decision truly saddens me. pazzyanne Mar 2023 #7
Why a Billion Crabs Have Suddenly Vanished From the Bering Sea Botany Mar 2023 #8
Not Joe Manchin BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #11
Methane Manchin orthoclad Mar 2023 #21
Well he advocates for fossil fuel use in his state for energy production BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #23
He's pushing for that "streamlined" process orthoclad Mar 2023 #24
That doesn't matter here BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #26
Manchin slams Biden's 'radical climate agenda' in delay of oil leasing Celerity Mar 2023 #34
The Alaska wells aren't "offshore" BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #36
Right. They're inland. ancianita Mar 2023 #38
With the last update to the OP, I actually grabbed and added a snapshot of the map to show the area BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #40
Right. Sorry, got caught up in the thread and missed your OP map. ancianita Mar 2023 #43
I know they are a bunch of hours difference from ET BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #45
This is good history. I knew the Alaska Reserve existed before Obama, and now you've ancianita Mar 2023 #48
+1 betsuni Mar 2023 #51
Wiping out farms of life, that help sustain man, is not the way forward, it cuts off a "hand'... MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #12
May reason rule! Botany Mar 2023 #14
Happy Monday y'all! Man's Reasoned Progress is Always at War with Malevolent Actors MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #18
So the media was right in last week's prediction on this one. Biden has some explaining to do Raven123 Mar 2023 #9
"I can imagine he is trying to calculate our need for fossil fuels and our need to be independent" BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #10
Blue Dog Member FredGarvin Mar 2023 #31
She is brand new BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #33
We're already gas & oil independent, and the #1 oil exporter on the planet. ancianita Mar 2023 #39
Yeah the "carve out" regions were announced ahead of this BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #42
"Bare minimum." That's exactly what Biden is doing. ancianita Mar 2023 #44
Here in PA, we have the Marcellus shale fields BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #46
Cool. Part of the shale revolution that made us energy independent, not dependent on ancianita Mar 2023 #49
We need to see the environmental impact statement, Bayard Mar 2023 #13
Rep. Mary Pelota (D, at-large AK) wrote an editorial last week BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #16
"We can't shoulder the burden of fixing global climate change alone." Bayard Mar 2023 #50
Most of the oil production is coming out of states like TX and the Gulf of Mexico BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #54
I had no idea either Bayard Mar 2023 #55
Thank you for that link! (again sorry to unload the below as a reply but I use for later reference) BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #57
Thank you! betsuni Mar 2023 #52
The environmental impact of drilling and using oil is well known already. Magoo48 Mar 2023 #25
He's not talking out of both sides of his mouth. Here's what the AP reported ancianita Mar 2023 #41
A sellout orthoclad Mar 2023 #19
Can anyone tell this Democrat why Willow was approved when environmentalists Ferrets are Cool Mar 2023 #20
Follow the money orthoclad Mar 2023 #22
Because the Democrat who just got elected there for a full term this past November BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #27
Thanks, I guess that is as good an answer as any. Ferrets are Cool Mar 2023 #28
I listened to what she had to say BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #29
Didn't realize it was her decision News Junkie Mar 2023 #59
She represents the state of AK as their at-large member of Congress BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #61
And Joe Biden represents the country News Junkie Mar 2023 #63
No it's way "off base" to distort what the background of this issue is BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #64
So much for his campaign promise of no new drilling on public lands ripcord Mar 2023 #30
This decision, in my opinion, blue-wave Mar 2023 #53
Biden had no leverage to ban Willow; negotiated a 40% reduction Justice Mar 2023 #56
This why I pointed out what environmentalists need to be focussing on BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden administration appr...»Reply #34