Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,515 posts)
36. The Alaska wells aren't "offshore"
Mon Mar 13, 2023, 04:35 PM
Mar 2023

The big $$$ is the Gulf Of Mexico wells "offshore". The infrastructure is easier to deal with in the warm bathwater.

Ironically, Rubio and Scott wanted to keep "offshore" GOM drilling away from Florida - https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2021/7/rubio-introduces-american-shores-protection-act

Rubio Introduces American Shores Protection Act
Jul 26 2021


Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Rick Scott (R-FL) introduced the American Shores Protection Act to codify the moratorium on oil and gas drilling off the coasts of Florida that was put in place by a September 8, 2020 Executive Order by then-President Trump. Under the legislation, the moratorium would be in place for the Eastern Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic until 2032.

Congressman Michael Waltz (R-FL) introduced companion legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“From beautiful beaches that draw tourists from around the world to housing critical military infrastructure, Florida’s coastlines are vital to our state and national economies,” Rubio said. “Protecting Florida’s unique coasts and vital military assets has long been a priority of mine. I am grateful for the steps taken by the Trump Administration to ensure the existing moratorium in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico remains in place beyond 2022, but we must do more. This legislation would solidify the protections that President Trump implemented, ensuring that both of Florida’s coasts will remain safe from executive action to revoke the moratorium.”

“As Governor of Florida, I fought for and secured a commitment from the Trump administration to ban oil drilling off Florida’s coasts,” Scott said. “While I’m glad the moratorium on drilling was extended for another 10 years under the Trump Administration, it’s time to codify this ban into law. I’m proud to join Senator Rubio in this important fight to preserve and protect Florida’s natural resources for generations to come.”

(snip)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

bloomberg... orleans Mar 2023 #1
NYT re environmental impact... ancianita Mar 2023 #3
Well shit. Autumn Mar 2023 #2
Al Gore warns it would be 'recklessly irresponsible' to allow Alaska oil drilling plan Celerity Mar 2023 #17
He is correct G_j Mar 2023 #32
He's right. This negates everything Biden has done with climate change. Autumn Mar 2023 #35
We are not serious about our addiction to oil. Thunderbeast Mar 2023 #4
Thats due to our limited options atm for the power requirements we have here cstanleytech Mar 2023 #15
It is not our addiction to oil. former9thward Mar 2023 #37
Humans are too stupid to avert a catastrophe Mysterian Mar 2023 #60
I pity the later generations... DemocraticPatriot Mar 2023 #47
Great post. hamsterjill Mar 2023 #62
Drill baby drill inwiththenew Mar 2023 #5
Rome will burn, whether Nero accompanies or not. jaxexpat Mar 2023 #6
This decision truly saddens me. pazzyanne Mar 2023 #7
Why a Billion Crabs Have Suddenly Vanished From the Bering Sea Botany Mar 2023 #8
Not Joe Manchin BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #11
Methane Manchin orthoclad Mar 2023 #21
Well he advocates for fossil fuel use in his state for energy production BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #23
He's pushing for that "streamlined" process orthoclad Mar 2023 #24
That doesn't matter here BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #26
Manchin slams Biden's 'radical climate agenda' in delay of oil leasing Celerity Mar 2023 #34
The Alaska wells aren't "offshore" BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #36
Right. They're inland. ancianita Mar 2023 #38
With the last update to the OP, I actually grabbed and added a snapshot of the map to show the area BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #40
Right. Sorry, got caught up in the thread and missed your OP map. ancianita Mar 2023 #43
I know they are a bunch of hours difference from ET BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #45
This is good history. I knew the Alaska Reserve existed before Obama, and now you've ancianita Mar 2023 #48
+1 betsuni Mar 2023 #51
Wiping out farms of life, that help sustain man, is not the way forward, it cuts off a "hand'... MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #12
May reason rule! Botany Mar 2023 #14
Happy Monday y'all! Man's Reasoned Progress is Always at War with Malevolent Actors MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #18
So the media was right in last week's prediction on this one. Biden has some explaining to do Raven123 Mar 2023 #9
"I can imagine he is trying to calculate our need for fossil fuels and our need to be independent" BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #10
Blue Dog Member FredGarvin Mar 2023 #31
She is brand new BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #33
We're already gas & oil independent, and the #1 oil exporter on the planet. ancianita Mar 2023 #39
Yeah the "carve out" regions were announced ahead of this BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #42
"Bare minimum." That's exactly what Biden is doing. ancianita Mar 2023 #44
Here in PA, we have the Marcellus shale fields BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #46
Cool. Part of the shale revolution that made us energy independent, not dependent on ancianita Mar 2023 #49
We need to see the environmental impact statement, Bayard Mar 2023 #13
Rep. Mary Pelota (D, at-large AK) wrote an editorial last week BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #16
"We can't shoulder the burden of fixing global climate change alone." Bayard Mar 2023 #50
Most of the oil production is coming out of states like TX and the Gulf of Mexico BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #54
I had no idea either Bayard Mar 2023 #55
Thank you for that link! (again sorry to unload the below as a reply but I use for later reference) BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #57
Thank you! betsuni Mar 2023 #52
The environmental impact of drilling and using oil is well known already. Magoo48 Mar 2023 #25
He's not talking out of both sides of his mouth. Here's what the AP reported ancianita Mar 2023 #41
A sellout orthoclad Mar 2023 #19
Can anyone tell this Democrat why Willow was approved when environmentalists Ferrets are Cool Mar 2023 #20
Follow the money orthoclad Mar 2023 #22
Because the Democrat who just got elected there for a full term this past November BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #27
Thanks, I guess that is as good an answer as any. Ferrets are Cool Mar 2023 #28
I listened to what she had to say BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #29
Didn't realize it was her decision News Junkie Mar 2023 #59
She represents the state of AK as their at-large member of Congress BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #61
And Joe Biden represents the country News Junkie Mar 2023 #63
No it's way "off base" to distort what the background of this issue is BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #64
So much for his campaign promise of no new drilling on public lands ripcord Mar 2023 #30
This decision, in my opinion, blue-wave Mar 2023 #53
Biden had no leverage to ban Willow; negotiated a 40% reduction Justice Mar 2023 #56
This why I pointed out what environmentalists need to be focussing on BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden administration appr...»Reply #36