Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,142 posts)
45. I know they are a bunch of hours difference from ET
Mon Mar 13, 2023, 08:45 PM
Mar 2023

and I had been refreshing on and off all day to get updates from that source and they did finally update their page and I updated the OP.

The map that the newspaper's site had also showed where the pipeline is relative to that patch of land associated with Willow.

I have been hearing about that "reserve" since Carter and I finally got chance to focus long enough to see exactly where it was located. I also found his statement about proposed legislation related to the creation of that reserve from over 40 years ago (something that might be upsetting to DU) -

Jimmy Carter
39th President of the United States: 1977 ‐ 1981
National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Statement on Proposed Legislation.


January 28, 1980

Today I have sent the Congress legislation calling for a private oil and gas leasing program for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. A vital element of my energy program is to accelerate domestic energy production as a means to lessen our dependence on foreign oil and increase this Nation's energy security. We must make greater use of America's abundant natural resources, including oil, if we are to succeed in our struggle to win the energy fight.

To stimulate increased oil production here at home, I have already decontrolled the price of domestically produced "heavy" crude oil, implemented a phasing out of oil price controls for conventional crude oil, and stepped up the leasing schedule for oil production from the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf. The proposal sent to the Congress today will be another step in our overall plan of accelerating domestic energy production.

The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska is situated on the Arctic North Slope of Alaska and in size is larger than the combined acreage of Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Delaware. My proposal will rename the Reserve the Western Arctic Management Area under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management. The area will be managed under the principles of multiple use. This region has been the site of substantial Government-sponsored oil exploration since 1923. It was in that year that President Harding first set the area aside as a Naval Petroleum Reserve and directed the U.S. Navy to explore and manage the area. Based on the data gathered by the Navy and the Interior Department since then, the Reserve is believed to have promising oil and gas potential, with current estimates projecting an average of 7 billion barrels of oil and 14 trillion cubic feet of gas in place. It is my belief that exploration and development of these resources can be achieved most quickly and at least cost to the Government by a federally managed private leasing program. I am encouraged by the prospects that this proposal has for bringing into production badly needed domestic oil and gas.

When enacted, the legislation will provide for an accelerated leasing schedule, with the first competitive bids taking place 20 months after passage of the legislation. This is the minimum amount of time required to allow for development of necessary land management plans, environmental assessments, and lease sale preparation.

I am also confident that this legislation contains sufficient protection for the fragile arctic environment found there; because not only does this area of Alaska hold promise for oil development, but it possesses unique surface resources, including magnificent wildlife populations, native cultural and archeological heritage, scenic grandeur, and recreational opportunities. The land use plan which will be developed will direct special attention to these resources and will be designed especially to protect wildlife from adverse effects of exploration and drilling operations.

The proposal is a well-balanced one. It will expedite oil and gas development and ensure the protection of the other natural resources of the area. It is in the interests of our Nation's security, and I urge early congressional action on this legislation.

Jimmy Carter, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Statement on Proposed Legislation. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/249623

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/national-petroleum-reserve-alaska-statement-proposed-legislation


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

bloomberg... orleans Mar 2023 #1
NYT re environmental impact... ancianita Mar 2023 #3
Well shit. Autumn Mar 2023 #2
Al Gore warns it would be 'recklessly irresponsible' to allow Alaska oil drilling plan Celerity Mar 2023 #17
He is correct G_j Mar 2023 #32
He's right. This negates everything Biden has done with climate change. Autumn Mar 2023 #35
We are not serious about our addiction to oil. Thunderbeast Mar 2023 #4
Thats due to our limited options atm for the power requirements we have here cstanleytech Mar 2023 #15
It is not our addiction to oil. former9thward Mar 2023 #37
Humans are too stupid to avert a catastrophe Mysterian Mar 2023 #60
I pity the later generations... DemocraticPatriot Mar 2023 #47
Great post. hamsterjill Mar 2023 #62
Drill baby drill inwiththenew Mar 2023 #5
Rome will burn, whether Nero accompanies or not. jaxexpat Mar 2023 #6
This decision truly saddens me. pazzyanne Mar 2023 #7
Why a Billion Crabs Have Suddenly Vanished From the Bering Sea Botany Mar 2023 #8
Not Joe Manchin BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #11
Methane Manchin orthoclad Mar 2023 #21
Well he advocates for fossil fuel use in his state for energy production BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #23
He's pushing for that "streamlined" process orthoclad Mar 2023 #24
That doesn't matter here BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #26
Manchin slams Biden's 'radical climate agenda' in delay of oil leasing Celerity Mar 2023 #34
The Alaska wells aren't "offshore" BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #36
Right. They're inland. ancianita Mar 2023 #38
With the last update to the OP, I actually grabbed and added a snapshot of the map to show the area BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #40
Right. Sorry, got caught up in the thread and missed your OP map. ancianita Mar 2023 #43
I know they are a bunch of hours difference from ET BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #45
This is good history. I knew the Alaska Reserve existed before Obama, and now you've ancianita Mar 2023 #48
+1 betsuni Mar 2023 #51
Wiping out farms of life, that help sustain man, is not the way forward, it cuts off a "hand'... MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #12
May reason rule! Botany Mar 2023 #14
Happy Monday y'all! Man's Reasoned Progress is Always at War with Malevolent Actors MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #18
So the media was right in last week's prediction on this one. Biden has some explaining to do Raven123 Mar 2023 #9
"I can imagine he is trying to calculate our need for fossil fuels and our need to be independent" BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #10
Blue Dog Member FredGarvin Mar 2023 #31
She is brand new BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #33
We're already gas & oil independent, and the #1 oil exporter on the planet. ancianita Mar 2023 #39
Yeah the "carve out" regions were announced ahead of this BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #42
"Bare minimum." That's exactly what Biden is doing. ancianita Mar 2023 #44
Here in PA, we have the Marcellus shale fields BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #46
Cool. Part of the shale revolution that made us energy independent, not dependent on ancianita Mar 2023 #49
We need to see the environmental impact statement, Bayard Mar 2023 #13
Rep. Mary Pelota (D, at-large AK) wrote an editorial last week BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #16
"We can't shoulder the burden of fixing global climate change alone." Bayard Mar 2023 #50
Most of the oil production is coming out of states like TX and the Gulf of Mexico BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #54
I had no idea either Bayard Mar 2023 #55
Thank you for that link! (again sorry to unload the below as a reply but I use for later reference) BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #57
Thank you! betsuni Mar 2023 #52
The environmental impact of drilling and using oil is well known already. Magoo48 Mar 2023 #25
He's not talking out of both sides of his mouth. Here's what the AP reported ancianita Mar 2023 #41
A sellout orthoclad Mar 2023 #19
Can anyone tell this Democrat why Willow was approved when environmentalists Ferrets are Cool Mar 2023 #20
Follow the money orthoclad Mar 2023 #22
Because the Democrat who just got elected there for a full term this past November BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #27
Thanks, I guess that is as good an answer as any. Ferrets are Cool Mar 2023 #28
I listened to what she had to say BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #29
Didn't realize it was her decision News Junkie Mar 2023 #59
She represents the state of AK as their at-large member of Congress BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #61
And Joe Biden represents the country News Junkie Mar 2023 #63
No it's way "off base" to distort what the background of this issue is BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #64
So much for his campaign promise of no new drilling on public lands ripcord Mar 2023 #30
This decision, in my opinion, blue-wave Mar 2023 #53
Biden had no leverage to ban Willow; negotiated a 40% reduction Justice Mar 2023 #56
This why I pointed out what environmentalists need to be focussing on BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden administration appr...»Reply #45