Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Chubb CEO defends backing Trump appeal bond in E. Jean Carroll case [View all]EndlessWire
(6,574 posts)how the fraud case and the special monitor figure in. I thought all the property was in receivership? If this were true, wouldn't they need permission from the monitor to use it as collateral? I thought Trump and the sons were on hold as anyone who could make those decisions. Remember when he moved $40 million to Florida without permission?
I don't think there's a person on the board who doesn't want to see Carroll and her attorney get paid. But, we all know how crooked Trump is and how he operates. And, Trump isn't afraid of stiffing Chubb. How do you know he can't screw her out of a payment, in a big, chaotic, post appeal way? I agree with you. The best way for her to get paid is to get the bond payment. Then, Trump can have his property attached by James for the fraud case.
Of course, there's always Carroll 3 to think about. I think she should let that go, but I don't know how her current judgment would interplay with a possible need to relitigate the whole case. If that did not disturb her judgment here, and she felt like doing it, then she should sue him again. We'll see.
I greatly appreciate your putting up with my nitpicking.