Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Chubb CEO defends backing Trump appeal bond in E. Jean Carroll case [View all]dpibel
(2,895 posts)Please point to the place where I say it is a fact that the bond is supported by collateral other than Trump's assets.
I have said only that no one knows. I think that is indisputable. I am not speculating at all. I have never said someone else is providing collateral. Because I do not have any evidence of that, and have never claimed to. Nor do I need evidence to support the proposition that no one knows.
You, however, have stated without any evidence, that Trump is, as a matter of fact, the surety behind the bond.
There is a difference between saying something is known and saying something is unknown. The first, which is your position, should have evidence supporting it. That you do not have. The second, which is my position, pretty much is a flat statement of lack of evidence one way or the other.
You appear to be arguing that lack of evidence is proof of a contrary proposition. You are clearly smart enough to know that is an untenable argument.