Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DUU

(90 posts)
29. Here is how I expect they did this
Tue Sep 2, 2025, 09:56 PM
Sep 2025

I was a USCG contractor a decade+ ago and saw something similar. Look up DOD 3025.21 Defense Support of Law Enforcement, 2013 for the background.
Presidential legal findings (from Bush and Obama) have found it legal to put a USCG officer on a USN asset (usually a smaller vessel(s) like a destroyer). When the area of operations is reached, the Navy captain steps down and the Coastie assumes temporary command of the ship, while in communication with appropriate USCG Chain of Command.
During this period, any capability, weapon or personnel are under the control of the USCG and not USN. I expect what we read today was under similar circumstances and control, avoiding direct challenge to the Posse Comitatus act.

(PS: Don’t shoot the messenger I’m just providing a historical perspective)

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I cannot believe anything announced by this administration without independent verification. jls4561 Sep 2025 #1
Maduro claimed eight U.S. military vessels "with 1,200 missiles" were targeting his country LeftInTX Sep 2025 #3
I know, right? ShazzieB Sep 2025 #52
Venezuela JBTaurus83 Sep 2025 #2
Which means they probably sunk a small fishing boat Bayard Sep 2025 #4
Yes and no - there's a picture at CNN of the boat in sights. It's the size of a small fishing boat muriel_volestrangler Sep 2025 #13
That was my first thought hookaleft Sep 2025 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Bayard Sep 2025 #5
The US Navy has the capacity to arrest and board that vessel. Easily. maxsolomon Sep 2025 #6
That's usually how it's done with the Coast Guard's assistance Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2025 #16
When all else fails - start a friggin' war - we can all get our yellow ribbons and beat our chest. walkingman Sep 2025 #7
Modern day version of the Gulf of Tonkin. GP6971 Sep 2025 #27
Not ours. The media's. It's the distraction from his crimes and grifts that will last for days of news cycles. ancianita Sep 2025 #36
Trial by ballistic missile. C_U_L8R Sep 2025 #8
Either Rubio is lying or the US Navy went WAY beyond what's normal groundloop Sep 2025 #9
Depends OC375 Sep 2025 #11
Or that they would go all the way over there for the "war on drugs"...but..... LeftInTX Sep 2025 #17
The Epstein victims are publicly speaking out tomorrow. Coincidence? Jim__ Sep 2025 #10
Not a chance. groundloop Sep 2025 #18
Not at all. ShazzieB Sep 2025 #53
So now he's finally a war president? ananda Sep 2025 #12
There goes that Nobel Peace Prize. murielm99 Sep 2025 #32
He could have sunk a toy boat or two in his bathtub (w/o loss of life) and accomplished the same thing. n/t the nelm Sep 2025 #44
That is exactly what he did. ananda Sep 2025 #49
A drug cartel ship is not a military target SpankMe Sep 2025 #14
"Wag the dog"! ashredux Sep 2025 #15
Jeesus Fucking H Christ, they didn't even attempt to stop the boat..... just blew it out of the water. groundloop Sep 2025 #19
I think he wants something from Maduro and is trying to intimidate. LeftInTX Sep 2025 #20
Very well could be...... and tRump doesn't care who he kills to get what he wants. groundloop Sep 2025 #21
Yes. This also serves other purposes. One of long term media distraction, one of being a "protector" against ancianita Sep 2025 #37
I watched the video of the incident angrychair Sep 2025 #22
More than likely the cargo on that thing was people. It sure as hell wasn't breaking speed records Cheezoholic Sep 2025 #23
Exactly.... if it was only drugs there would have only been 2 or 3 people in the boat groundloop Sep 2025 #28
It looks like a drug runner boat to me. But it certainly doesn't justify blowing the thing up! LeftInTX Sep 2025 #38
Time to fly the Jolly Roger! BidenRocks Sep 2025 #24
The Secretary of State announces military actions on social media platforms? Prairie Gates Sep 2025 #25
It was late... underpants Sep 2025 #26
Here is how I expect they did this DUU Sep 2025 #29
Sounds solid. Thanks. ancianita Sep 2025 #40
Yes, this is true. However, this is to authorize LAW ENFORCEMENT, not non-judicial executions without trial. There is artemisia1 Sep 2025 #54
nothing more than a lie azureblue Sep 2025 #30
Most Laughable popsdenver Sep 2025 #46
Just another minor story they are using to prop themselves up and make it look like they care jgmiller Sep 2025 #31
THERE WAS A VIDEO..... THAT BOAT WAS BLOWN OUT OF THE WATER !!!!!!!!! groundloop Sep 2025 #33
No attempt to capture pfitz59 Sep 2025 #34
The normal method to intercepting a drug vessel would be "stop and search" Old Testament Libera Sep 2025 #39
Just another popsdenver Sep 2025 #47
All this strongman smashing, murderous drama serves many ends. A fabricated national security threat is only one of them ancianita Sep 2025 #41
the distractions from Epstein are getting lethal Skittles Sep 2025 #42
everything is a nail to these morons. nt Javaman Sep 2025 #43
If the purpose of a drug smuggling boat.. MarcoZandrini Sep 2025 #45
EXACTLY............. popsdenver Sep 2025 #48
EPSTEIN FILES!! tonekat Sep 2025 #50
This proves that the military will follow orders Miguelito Loveless Sep 2025 #51
'Enormous scandal': Chris Hayes reacts to Trump's deadly strike on 'drug-carrying boat' - All In - MSNBC Rhiannon12866 Sep 2025 #55
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US military 'conducted a ...»Reply #29