Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
23. There are ZERO hand-picked cronies at BLS. The single one and only political nominee has been withdrawn.
Wed Oct 1, 2025, 08:24 PM
Oct 2025
E.J. Antoni's nomination to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics was recently withdrawn by the White House, with plans to announce a new nominee soon. His nomination faced criticism for being too partisan and potentially undermining the credibility of the agency. Axios NBC News


The acting head is a long-time professional economist who has been acting head before under different presidents.

You have nothing and you have shit on the professional economists at the BLS. All the data is public, all the calculation procedures are public and everything is reviewed by commercial and academic economists outside the BLS. Your title is flat wrong.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A key MAGA report will have some cooked up numbers saying everything is awesome IronLionZion Oct 2025 #1
The BLS report that was going to be released Friday is probably done Johnny2X2X Oct 2025 #2
Wrong. In 2013, The same thing happened. Shutdown on October 1, then no Jobs Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #3
"they had no idea what the numbers would look like" PSPS Oct 2025 #5
OMG. You have no idea what you are talking about. Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #6
Well, there's this PSPS Oct 2025 #7
Please Stop! You honestly don't know what you're talking about! Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #8
Well, here's a former head of the BLS indicating Trump could impact upcoming reports, regardless of who's commissioner: SunSeeker Oct 2025 #13
Nice try. But you failed big time. You'll find that I've never typed a single word in any post here Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #15
I did not "fail big time." I did not "fail" at all. You admitted my point. SunSeeker Oct 2025 #17
{Sigh} 🙄🥱Ridiculous Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #21
"Ridiculous" is thinking we still live in a world where we don't have Trump slandering BLS staffers. SunSeeker Oct 2025 #29
maga might easily ignore numbers, but corporations will not, and maga will notice layoffs around them Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #33
You failed at your implication of tRump interference. "unless" is a hypothetical, a possibility, nowhere near a fact.nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #22
Trump has interfered by slandering BLS statisticians. That is why Groshen is worried (her words). SunSeeker Oct 2025 #28
We are all worried, but it is important to not cynically assume facts not in evidence. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #31
There's plenty of evidence of Trump defaming BLS staff and BLS survey responses dropping off. SunSeeker Oct 2025 #36
Declines in survey responses have been happening slowly without tRump. There is no evidence he has accelerated it. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #38
Groshen is not insulting BLS, nor am I. We are pointing out how Trump is harming BLS. SunSeeker Oct 2025 #39
It's about time you stated that. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #40
It's about time you stopped insulting me....nt SunSeeker Oct 2025 #42
Your excerpt indicates NO problem from political influence and MAYBE survey lack of response maybe in the FUTURE. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #20
Groshen is worried for a reason. I think she knows what she is talking about. SunSeeker Oct 2025 #30
Exactly as I stated. She is worried about survey participation, NOT about fudging data or calculations. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #32
You fail to understand Groshen's (and my) point. Participation drops hurt data accuracy. SunSeeker Oct 2025 #35
Data inaccuracy due to survey response rates is NOT corruption, NOR is it interference, NOR is it the fault of BLS. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #37
Trump causing response rates to fall is interference. SunSeeker Oct 2025 #41
ooooooof Prairie Gates Oct 2025 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2025 #9
Biden did NOT have these job losses LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2025 #10
ADP reported a loss in the monthly jobs report only once in Joe Biden's 4 years (March 23). Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #11
Guess who'll be raging at ADP soon BaronChocula Oct 2025 #12
Job Reports Demarch Oct 2025 #14
Delaying the release of the Jobs Report during a shutdown is standard operating procedure Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #16
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2025 #34
No report coming out of the government with trump's hand picked cronies can be trusted. lostincalifornia Oct 2025 #18
There are ZERO hand-picked cronies at BLS. The single one and only political nominee has been withdrawn. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #23
Excuse me Bernardo. He just fired the BLS Commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, because he didn't like lostincalifornia Oct 2025 #24
It is a mistake to think that because one person was fired, suddenly all the unfired employees are corrupt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #25
What, the Department of Justice is targeting the Presidents political enemies? Buddyzbuddy Oct 2025 #19
Tough times coming BlueWaveNeverEnd Oct 2025 #26
☝️ CentralMass Oct 2025 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Private payrolls declined...»Reply #23