Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,151 posts)
12. If he tries, will the 9th Circuit (Justice Kagan's district) or SCOTUS stop him.
Mon Oct 6, 2025, 07:47 PM
Oct 2025

Because the non-maga justices know that the felon's goal is to eventually declare martial law, which suspends the US Constitution and InstituteS military control over civilian parts of government.

And yes, in preparation for that Hegseth and trump have created a lawless sector within the military that would betray their oaths.

The signs are clear.

trump's unstated goal is military dictatorship -- originally sold to the public, lest we forget, as only "dictator on day one."

from DeepMind AI:

Insurrection Act vs. martial law
The Insurrection Act is not the same as declaring martial law, which involves the temporary takeover of civilian government functions by the military.

While martial law can lead to a temporary suspension of certain civil liberties, the president does not have the constitutional authority to unilaterally declare it or suspend the writ of habeas corpus without Congress's consent.

Limitations on presidential power
The Insurrection Act is a law passed by Congress that empowers the president to act under specific, limited circumstances, as opposed to an inherent executive power to suspend the Constitution.
While the president has broad discretion to invoke the act, it is intended for use as a last resort in a crisis that overwhelms civilian authorities. [Which he intends to do by occupying blue states.]

Historical use of the Insurrection Act has often occurred when state authorities were unwilling or unable to protect constitutional rights, as seen during the Civil Rights Movement.

Legal scholars have called for reform to the outdated law to
a) define the criteria for invocation more clearly,
b) impose time limits, and
c) allow for mandated judicial review.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This has to stop.............. Lovie777 Oct 2025 #1
He threatened that in 2020. Is it a bone to eastern Oregon MAGA territory? bucolic_frolic Oct 2025 #2
Gaslighting every step of the way. no_hypocrisy Oct 2025 #3
Seems SCROTUS Six are co-conspirators. Kid Berwyn Oct 2025 #24
Humanitarian drumpf cares about the wellbeing of our citizens JoseBalow Oct 2025 #4
And our elections dweller Oct 2025 #5
well isn't that special Skittles Oct 2025 #6
Its easy to see where this is heading. orangecrush Oct 2025 #7
yes Skittles Oct 2025 #10
Wouldn't it be nice to see tomorrow's headline: joshdawg Oct 2025 #23
Came here to say something like this. No need AKwannabe Oct 2025 #9
TACO CosmicSloth Oct 2025 #8
that's always been the plan North Coast Lawyer Oct 2025 #11
If he tries, will the 9th Circuit (Justice Kagan's district) or SCOTUS stop him. ancianita Oct 2025 #12
The criteria for the act cannot be met. TomSlick Oct 2025 #14
Understood. Yet, he's sure some city or state can be provoked by his unremoved military occupation. ancianita Oct 2025 #15
He's constructing a "reality"... Septua Oct 2025 #17
Which is...? ancianita Oct 2025 #18
To be King of America Septua Oct 2025 #21
..or maybe it's just distraction... Septua Oct 2025 #22
What good it does to reform to the outdated law when... Justice matters. Oct 2025 #20
And how far behind will Chicago be? greatauntoftriplets Oct 2025 #13
The nation is under siege pfitz59 Oct 2025 #16
Okay, how do we combat this? Bayard Oct 2025 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump threatens to invoke...»Reply #12