Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Barry Bonds Not Elected To Hall of Fame [View all]Are_grits_groceries
(17,139 posts)42. Rose is much worse IMHO.
What Rose did cuts to the heart of the game and anybody's ability to believe in it. By betting while managing, he could directly manipulate the outcome. He might swing it one way or the other without even realizing it.
I am no fan of steroid users. However, they still have to have a modicum of talent to hit the ball. In addition, the outcome they can consistently produce is not guaranteed.
Rose couldn't guarantee an outcome, but with the ability to move and/ or remove players, he could really affect it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
IMO what Pete Rose did is far less objectionable than cheating on the game by using steroids n/t
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2013
#8
So he bets a lot when he lets them lose. And he bets a little when he helps them win.
El Supremo
Jan 2013
#49
A long as you get 5% of the vote each year, you remain on the ballot for 15 years. n/t
FSogol
Jan 2013
#45
It's an disadvantage to players trying to make the team that choose not to use.
WhoWoodaKnew
Jan 2013
#63