Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: SNAP Recipients Fight Back In Junk Food Crackdown [View all]radicalleft
(575 posts)91. This is nothing more than the continaution of Ronald Reagan and the "welfare queen driving Cadillacs"
bullshit he peddled in the 80's.
Or nothing more than the Florida attempt to drug test "welfare" recipients.
It's red-meat for the base...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just give them the fucking money. They spend more money "discussing" it than it costs.
twodogsbarking
Thursday
#2
It is, and always has been, about control, shaming, and, to a great degree, misogyny,
niyad
Thursday
#11
My sympathies would revolve around a better understanding of "access food", "manage health conditions" and......
FadedMullet
Thursday
#3
These rules would prevent a family from using SNAP to buy a birthday cake for their kids.
SunSeeker
Thursday
#9
In what world would high-quality anything be as affordable as junk?
Oliver Bolliver Butt
Thursday
#28
Did my post just get called ridiculous by someone claiming that "food is free"?
Oliver Bolliver Butt
Friday
#96
I'm not against junk food restrictions but I support an increase in the amount provided as eating healthy isn't cheap.
cstanleytech
Thursday
#8
Many poor people lack kitchens in which to whip up those great recipes from scratch with all their helpful vitamins.
CTyankee
Friday
#54
This doesn't stop them from buying TV dinners and macaroni and cheese and other easy quick Foods
EX500rider
Friday
#64
Yes which is why produce is a good area to provide more money to spend on as you don't need to cook salads.
cstanleytech
Friday
#68
A great point. The issue is how we get such foods to those who need, but can't afford to buy, those food items.
CTyankee
Friday
#73
"The five plaintiffs--who live in Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee and West Virginia..."
BaronChocula
Thursday
#10
Starting April 1, Texas also will ban SNAP purchases of many drinks that use artificial sweeteners.
Celerity
Friday
#55
That's an entirely different issue though but it's one that does need to be addressed urgently IMO.
cstanleytech
Friday
#69
I understand your point. I was thinking that the "Other sons-a-####"" would stop trashing the poor..
chouchou
Friday
#50
Unfortunately, your words are true. I keep hoping that mostly people are kind, fair and just.
chouchou
Friday
#58
Where does it say "fresh food"? It says no "candy and sugary drinks" That would leave tons of options..
EX500rider
Friday
#51
90 billion dollars the defense department wasted on lobster, crab and steak 🥩
questionseverything
Friday
#82
Sure there was some furniture, ice cream machines, musical instruments and
questionseverything
Friday
#92
I think a snickers or a Reeces has more protein than chips or pastries
questionseverything
Friday
#95
Most folks on snap have to supplement it with food pantry items or cash
questionseverything
Friday
#93