Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

radicalleft

(575 posts)
91. This is nothing more than the continaution of Ronald Reagan and the "welfare queen driving Cadillacs"
Fri Mar 13, 2026, 04:48 PM
Friday

bullshit he peddled in the 80's.

Or nothing more than the Florida attempt to drug test "welfare" recipients.

It's red-meat for the base...

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sugar may not be the main problem bucolic_frolic Thursday #1
see post 15 niyad Thursday #20
Just give them the fucking money. They spend more money "discussing" it than it costs. twodogsbarking Thursday #2
It is, and always has been, about control, shaming, and, to a great degree, misogyny, niyad Thursday #11
That is what emotion Ai is for! jfz9580m Friday #53
the money spent investigating and verifying "means tests" rampartd 20 hrs ago #101
My sympathies would revolve around a better understanding of "access food", "manage health conditions" and...... FadedMullet Thursday #3
Do we get a say in what type of food the military is served? choie Thursday #5
That's exactly why orangecrush 6 hrs ago #116
These rules would prevent a family from using SNAP to buy a birthday cake for their kids. SunSeeker Thursday #9
see post 15 niyad Thursday #19
Sure Cirsium 16 hrs ago #107
I don't know... Jacson6 Thursday #4
See post 15 niyad Thursday #21
I'll pay attention to the counter-arguments when healthy food Torchlight Thursday #6
You nailed it "when healthy food is as affordable as many junk foods" quaint Thursday #7
THANK YOU!!! niyad Thursday #18
In what world would high-quality anything be as affordable as junk? Oliver Bolliver Butt Thursday #28
A sane one? niyad Thursday #38
define 'junk' then Oliver Bolliver Butt Thursday #42
Anything I don't like. niyad Thursday #43
Oh, I don't know Cirsium 16 hrs ago #106
on that we agree! Oliver Bolliver Butt 15 hrs ago #110
Great Cirsium 14 hrs ago #111
In the same world that sealions move goalposts Torchlight Friday #57
Oh, come on Cirsium Friday #77
Did my post just get called ridiculous by someone claiming that "food is free"? Oliver Bolliver Butt Friday #96
Correct Cirsium Friday #97
this is why we lose elections Oliver Bolliver Butt Friday #98
Oh, sure it is Cirsium Friday #99
Nice bumper sticker Torchlight 20 hrs ago #100
And when healthy food is available moonscape Thursday #35
EXACTLY. see post 15. niyad Thursday #39
Who says they have to buy healthy food? EX500rider Friday #63
You're arguing a point I neither made nor implied. Torchlight Friday #65
Maybe you could acquaint yourself with some of the restrictions, niyad Friday #70
There's certainly some self-righteous sanctimonious posting going on here EX500rider Friday #74
ohhh myyyyyy. Our mileage does indeed vary. Thank you for confirming niyad Friday #86
I'm not against junk food restrictions but I support an increase in the amount provided as eating healthy isn't cheap. cstanleytech Thursday #8
See post 15. niyad Thursday #17
Many poor people lack kitchens in which to whip up those great recipes from scratch with all their helpful vitamins. CTyankee Friday #54
This doesn't stop them from buying TV dinners and macaroni and cheese and other easy quick Foods EX500rider Friday #64
Why do we get to be their food cop? CTyankee Friday #66
If the taxpayer is footing the bill the taxpayer has some say EX500rider Friday #67
I agree. How can we get at this problem as a society? CTyankee Friday #72
Yes which is why produce is a good area to provide more money to spend on as you don't need to cook salads. cstanleytech Friday #68
A great point. The issue is how we get such foods to those who need, but can't afford to buy, those food items. CTyankee Friday #73
"The five plaintiffs--who live in Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee and West Virginia..." BaronChocula Thursday #10
Really.?? What, exactly, are we to understand by that? niyad Thursday #12
With the exception of Colorado BaronChocula Thursday #13
Then why include Colorado? niyad Thursday #16
It was taken verbatim from the article BaronChocula Thursday #22
Thank you. niyad Thursday #23
... BaronChocula Thursday #24
Are people in those states less worthy of having food Bettie Thursday #26
The story they want to push with these restrictions, 70sEraVet Thursday #14
I think it's that taxpayer funded diabetes is a bad idea. pcdb Thursday #40
Do you seriously think ANY of this bs debate has to do with genuine concern niyad Thursday #44
Maybe not to Republicans pcdb Thursday #47
That isn't an either/or, regardless of how you frame it. Perhaps you niyad Friday #49
What other issues? pcdb Friday #89
Before I start screaming about the self-righteous sanctimony and niyad Thursday #15
But at what point is the line drawn? Polybius Thursday #37
Supplemental Nutrition. .last I checked, household items do not niyad Thursday #41
Ok, so we're in agreement Polybius 17 hrs ago #103
Starting April 1, Texas also will ban SNAP purchases of many drinks that use artificial sweeteners. Celerity Friday #55
yes yes yes yes Cirsium Friday #79
You think household supplies and alcohol should be covered by SNAP? Polybius 17 hrs ago #104
Nonsense Cirsium 16 hrs ago #105
It's an interesting position that I never heard anyone take Polybius 7 hrs ago #113
Why? Cirsium 7 hrs ago #114
yes yes yes yes PeaceWave 6 hrs ago #115
Totally agree with you IzzaNuDay Friday #56
That's an entirely different issue though but it's one that does need to be addressed urgently IMO. cstanleytech Friday #69
No, it is obviously a central part of the issue. niyad Friday #71
Thank you Cirsium Friday #78
You are most welcome. One would not think such a post was needed niyad Friday #83
If I remember correctly in NYS/C... electric_blue68 Thursday #25
I remember exactly that decades ago when I got food stamps. NH Ethylene Thursday #27
In my case it was just for me... electric_blue68 Thursday #29
I can't speak for NYS, but soda and candy was allowed in NYC when I was on it Polybius Thursday #36
I'm an NYC'r but don't have SNAP anymore... electric_blue68 Thursday #45
I think I wrote this the other day. chouchou Thursday #30
Why should there be ANY "percentage for fun" designation? By WHOSE niyad Thursday #34
I understand your point. I was thinking that the "Other sons-a-####"" would stop trashing the poor.. chouchou Friday #50
I can welll understand your desire to try that. However, as old and jaded niyad Friday #52
Unfortunately, your words are true. I keep hoping that mostly people are kind, fair and just. chouchou Friday #58
It is good to have hope and optimism. niyad Friday #59
Absolutely. We can go shopping like professionals. chouchou Friday #60
yayyyy niyad Friday #61
You haven't been able to buy beer or wine for decades MichMan Thursday #31
see post 15 niyad Thursday #32
OMG, enough with the post #15 GenThePerservering Friday #75
Good for you Cirsium Friday #81
Thank you for confirming my post. niyad Friday #85
Creative use of Reductio ad absurdum. Very serious stuff Torchlight Friday #62
Let us add one little thing to this discussion. Apprroximately FIFTY PERCENT niyad Thursday #33
Not everyone has cooking facilities or equipment. Demobrat Thursday #46
THANK YOU!! And then there are the tuly homeless. I have never niyad Friday #48
I only didn't mention them because Demobrat Friday #87
Many shelters provide an address orangecrush 5 hrs ago #117
Where does it say "fresh food"? It says no "candy and sugary drinks" That would leave tons of options.. EX500rider Friday #51
90 billion dollars the defense department wasted on lobster, crab and steak 🥩 questionseverything Friday #82
90 billion? You sure about that? EX500rider Friday #90
Sure there was some furniture, ice cream machines, musical instruments and questionseverything Friday #92
The figure I saw was 22 million EX500rider Friday #94
I think a snickers or a Reeces has more protein than chips or pastries questionseverything Friday #95
Thank you Cirsium Friday #80
when i was on snap, ShepKat Friday #76
see post 15 niyad Friday #84
You had a home with a working kitchen to make them in. Demobrat Friday #88
Most folks on snap have to supplement it with food pantry items or cash questionseverything Friday #93
This is nothing more than the continaution of Ronald Reagan and the "welfare queen driving Cadillacs" radicalleft Friday #91
Soda isn't food OC375 19 hrs ago #102
Grow up? berniesandersmittens 15 hrs ago #108
All about taxing the rich on my end OC375 13 hrs ago #112
This isn't the hill Democrats should die upon NickB79 15 hrs ago #109
Bye orangecrush 5 hrs ago #118
Ciao NickB79 5 hrs ago #120
I could not care less what people spend them on. Demobrat 5 hrs ago #119
Marijuana edibles? PeaceWave 4 hrs ago #121
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SNAP Recipients Fight Bac...»Reply #91