Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(11,787 posts)
2. This actually sounds appropriate to me.
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 12:42 PM
14 hrs ago

I haven't read the regulations, so there's that caveat; but whether you consider crypto a store of value or a currency or both, it does not represent an investment in a company that has profits, losses, employees, or assets or that sells goods or services. I'm not sure how you'd even apply SEC disclosure requirements to it.

Just because there's a market for crypto and its sale can be subject to or used in fraud doesn't make it a "security" any more than, say, stamps or beanie babies.

Imho, the only reason the government delayed this decision for so long was that they feared the potential of crypto to expose the weakness of the dollar – a weakness created not by crypto but by decades of governmental recklessness and Treasury & Fed shenanigans.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New crypto regulations li...»Reply #2