Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

homegirl

(2,003 posts)
21. Is
Sun May 31, 2026, 02:10 PM
22 hrs ago

Aileen Cannon still in the running?

HEADS UP: The 11th Circuit has ordered Briefs in Judge Cannon's Volume II Case

Trump's Past Is Catching Up With Him
Joyce Vance
May 30, 2026
We’ve discussed Trump’s ongoing efforts to prevent the release of former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on the now-dismissed classified documents prosecution against the president. That issue has now resurfaced. As we discussed at the time, Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed by Trump and has always ruled in his favor, was never going to order the release of Volume II of the Special Counsel Report, which covers the classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago. But now the matter is in the hands of a different court, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which has not hesitated to correct Cannon’s errors in the past.

There is a fascinating resonance between Cannon’s decision to prevent the release of Volume II and the issue we’ve seen surface in Trump v. IRS, the case whose “settlement” led to the creation of the slush fund Trump can use to give taxpayer dollars to January 6 defendants while erasing his and his family’s liability for debts owed to the government, like back taxes from tax audits. The common thread is cases where, instead of a legitimate adversarial process, with opponents duking it out in court, Trump is the actual party in interest on “both sides of the v.” In both of these situations, it’s Trump v. Trump, which leaves the president to decide what positions government agencies will take in these supposed legal conflicts. In the case of the special counsel’s report, DOJ, which would normally argue for its release, has taken Trump’s side. And Judge Cannon has played along.

snip

https://joycevance.substack.com/p/trumps-past-is-catching-up-with-him?r=5n3e&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If we take back the Senate you're going to fastest retirement and refill yourout Saturday #1
IF, IF we take back the Senate ... just glanced at the LBN article about the Maine race ... cliffside Saturday #3
Yep JBTaurus83 Saturday #2
I don't support packing the court, but... Mark.b2 Saturday #4
I don't support packing it. I support expanding it. Too much power in too few hands yourout Saturday #5
I'm with you, yourout! slightlv Saturday #10
Think I could go with ... oldsoldierfadingfast Yesterday #14
Term limits for just SCOTUS or congress too? live love laugh Yesterday #15
Am still thinking about them ... n/t oldsoldierfadingfast 20 hrs ago #28
Then they will do it right back. The Grand Illuminist 21 hrs ago #25
Fine.... It still spreads out the power. yourout 20 hrs ago #27
I'm on the fence about age limits, an 84 year old Sanders was out there in Feb 2025, mostly red districts ... cliffside Saturday #6
Pelosi is a good example too of why age limits should not apply. live love laugh Yesterday #16
I've never heard that idea proposed.... Mark.b2 Saturday #7
Why resort to agism when enforceable ethics laws would solve most of our problems with the court? nt Trueblue Texan 21 hrs ago #23
Age restrictions can be appropriate at times.... Mark.b2 21 hrs ago #26
McConnell's cunning enough to use his health to advance the term limits agenda. live love laugh 18 hrs ago #29
I have a real problem with "too old" being determined by a number. Trueblue Texan 14 hrs ago #30
If Dems retake the senate in November... Fiendish Thingy Saturday #8
+ 1 ... nt cliffside Saturday #11
That this fascist dumbfuck has single-handedly appointed WAY too many judges (not just on the Supreme Court) is Karasu Saturday #9
Agree, control of the Senate is important! nt cliffside Saturday #12
'What readers are saying ... cliffside Saturday #13
Ugh--Supreme Court Justice Cannon.... Bayard Yesterday #17
Then we know what to do Abstractartist Yesterday #18
That does not eliminate the possibility of a lame duck confermation karynnj Yesterday #19
What happens if he appoints SC judge nominees right now? ihaveaquestion Yesterday #20
Is homegirl 22 hrs ago #21
I fully expect Alito and/or Thomas Quanto Magnus 22 hrs ago #22
There certainly will be vacancies if the Democrats win control of the Senate in November. cab67 21 hrs ago #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»There are no Supreme Cour...»Reply #21