Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Pregnant Teen Wins Abortion Battle [View all]happyslug
(14,779 posts)234. As to emancipation, the Illinois Emancipation of Minors Act has the following sentence:
This Act does not limit or exclude any other means either in statute or case law by which a minor may become emancipated.
The Illinois Emancipation of Minors Act:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2094&ChapterID=59
In simple terms, Illinois permits a child to ask to be emancipated, but Illinois does NOT make it a requirement. The Common Law Rule as to Emancipation are still alive and well in Illinois.
Don't worry Texas is similar, in its Emancipation of Minors act they use the word "MAY", which in the law means "MAY" NOT "Shall". "Shall" would mean the Minor MUST use the act, "May" means a minor does NOT have to use the act but may if they so desire.
Sec. 31.001. REQUIREMENTS. (a) A minor may petition to have the disabilities of minority removed for limited or general purposes if the minor is:
(1) a resident of this state;
(2) 17 years of age, or at least 16 years of age and living separate and apart from the minor's parents, managing conservator, or guardian; and
(3) self-supporting and managing the minor's own financial affairs.
(b) A minor may file suit under this chapter in the minor's own name. The minor need not be represented by next friend.
Sec. 31.002. REQUISITES OF PETITION; VERIFICATION. (a) The petition for removal of disabilities of minority must state:
(1) the name, age, and place of residence of the petitioner;
(2) the name and place of residence of each living parent;
(3) the name and place of residence of the guardian of the person and the guardian of the estate, if any;
(4) the name and place of residence of the managing conservator, if any;
(5) the reasons why removal would be in the best interest of the minor; and
(6) the purposes for which removal is requested.
(b) A parent of the petitioner must verify the petition, except that if a managing conservator or guardian of the person has been appointed, the petition must be verified by that person. If the person who is to verify the petition is unavailable or that person's whereabouts are unknown, the guardian ad litem shall verify the petition.
Sec. 31.003. VENUE. The petitioner shall file the petition in the county in which the petitioner resides.
Sec. 31.004. GUARDIAN AD LITEM. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the interest of the petitioner at the hearing.
Sec. 31.005. ORDER. The court by order, or the Texas Supreme Court by rule or order, may remove the disabilities of minority of a minor, including any restriction imposed by Chapter 32, if the court or the Texas Supreme Court finds the removal to be in the best interest of the petitioner. The order or rule must state the limited or general purposes for which disabilities are removed.
Sec. 31.006. EFFECT OF GENERAL REMOVAL. Except for specific constitutional and statutory age requirements, a minor whose disabilities are removed for general purposes has the capacity of an adult, including the capacity to contract. Except as provided by federal law, all educational rights accorded to the parent of a student, including the right to make education decisions under Section 151.003(a)(10), transfer to the minor whose disabilities are removed for general purposes.
Sec. 31.007. REGISTRATION OF ORDER OF ANOTHER STATE OR NATION. (a) A nonresident minor who has had the disabilities of minority removed in the state of the minor's residence may file a certified copy of the order removing disabilities in the deed records of any county in this state.
(b) When a certified copy of the order of a court of another state or nation is filed, the minor has the capacity of an adult, except as provided by Section 31.006 and by the terms of the order.
(1) a resident of this state;
(2) 17 years of age, or at least 16 years of age and living separate and apart from the minor's parents, managing conservator, or guardian; and
(3) self-supporting and managing the minor's own financial affairs.
(b) A minor may file suit under this chapter in the minor's own name. The minor need not be represented by next friend.
Sec. 31.002. REQUISITES OF PETITION; VERIFICATION. (a) The petition for removal of disabilities of minority must state:
(1) the name, age, and place of residence of the petitioner;
(2) the name and place of residence of each living parent;
(3) the name and place of residence of the guardian of the person and the guardian of the estate, if any;
(4) the name and place of residence of the managing conservator, if any;
(5) the reasons why removal would be in the best interest of the minor; and
(6) the purposes for which removal is requested.
(b) A parent of the petitioner must verify the petition, except that if a managing conservator or guardian of the person has been appointed, the petition must be verified by that person. If the person who is to verify the petition is unavailable or that person's whereabouts are unknown, the guardian ad litem shall verify the petition.
Sec. 31.003. VENUE. The petitioner shall file the petition in the county in which the petitioner resides.
Sec. 31.004. GUARDIAN AD LITEM. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the interest of the petitioner at the hearing.
Sec. 31.005. ORDER. The court by order, or the Texas Supreme Court by rule or order, may remove the disabilities of minority of a minor, including any restriction imposed by Chapter 32, if the court or the Texas Supreme Court finds the removal to be in the best interest of the petitioner. The order or rule must state the limited or general purposes for which disabilities are removed.
Sec. 31.006. EFFECT OF GENERAL REMOVAL. Except for specific constitutional and statutory age requirements, a minor whose disabilities are removed for general purposes has the capacity of an adult, including the capacity to contract. Except as provided by federal law, all educational rights accorded to the parent of a student, including the right to make education decisions under Section 151.003(a)(10), transfer to the minor whose disabilities are removed for general purposes.
Sec. 31.007. REGISTRATION OF ORDER OF ANOTHER STATE OR NATION. (a) A nonresident minor who has had the disabilities of minority removed in the state of the minor's residence may file a certified copy of the order removing disabilities in the deed records of any county in this state.
(b) When a certified copy of the order of a court of another state or nation is filed, the minor has the capacity of an adult, except as provided by Section 31.006 and by the terms of the order.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
244 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh right, like parents are not going to feel that they have to step in and help?
Tumbulu
Feb 2013
#14
You didn't tell us you know the people involved. Since you know "THAT is the best choice", I must
uppityperson
Feb 2013
#90
You don't understand why a grandparent would want to have their grandchildren around?
Exultant Democracy
Feb 2013
#145
Her parents are legally responsible for her (and her troubles) til she's 18 yrs old
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#53
why the parents of the boy are not legally liable for some of the girl's expenses
AlbertCat
Feb 2013
#97
I'm presuming they are responsible for the other half of medical costs
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#105
I'm going to guess that's why they were only ordered to pay half medical
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#98
Not sure any law requires them to pay for her phone or car. Just her food and lodging and health.
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2013
#122
Oh agreed. They also have to give her clothing. The car thing is weird.
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#123
Or you can be 100% trying to help and teach your kids, and they just don't give a damn.
loudsue
Feb 2013
#70
I am sick of the glorification of birth married to a complete absence of responsibility.
Sekhmets Daughter
Feb 2013
#35
I agree--that would be way past grounds for a visit from Child Protective Services or a
MADem
Feb 2013
#208
Thanks, I'll edit. I was going by a post, not the original article. I defer to the court documents.
freshwest
Feb 2013
#210
Her parents are legally responsible for her (and her troubles) til she's 18 yrs old
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#51
Yes, because they, themselves, should hot have had to commit to any parental
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2013
#225
Yes, but the parents shouldn't be liable for hospital bills, her transportation etc.
wisteria
Feb 2013
#31
Well, at that point the issue is rape, without the cover of "Romeo and Juliet" laws,
MADem
Feb 2013
#211
We'd defend a 16 year old boy whose parents tried to force him to get a tattoo
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#186
No, her parents should not get the ultimate decision over her body
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#205
So if parents can't have the ultimate decision, what's the point of parenthood then?
alp227
Feb 2013
#209
Parents force cosmetic procedures on their children all the time without their consent.
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#219
In the US, Hispanic baby girls very commonly sport pierced ears. Baby Hindu girls with bindis
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#222
Would you make your 16 year old have an abortion if she didn't want to?
Puzzledtraveller
Feb 2013
#153
yes i would - at 16, she had no idea how to take care of herself, much less a baby
wordpix
Feb 2013
#183
Forcing people to have abortions because of your opinion of their abilities
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#187
i dont understand the 'consequences be damned all that matters is she got her choice'
leftyohiolib
Feb 2013
#159
Agreed. Its odd that neither the parents nor child pursued emancipation
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#121
Many young people are rabidly anti-choice. Something is not right in the education system. n/t
SylviaD
Feb 2013
#8
This girl is from Texas, so she may be more conservative then most others her age.
alp227
Feb 2013
#84
Looks like the parents were trying to show her some adult responsibility.
Dont call me Shirley
Feb 2013
#25
They were paying the phone bill, owned the car and, as her parents, could
Sekhmets Daughter
Feb 2013
#40
She clearly is not--otherwise, her parents wouldn't be required to pay for her care and car. nt
MADem
Feb 2013
#214
Per the article, the girl is living with her mom. And the parents have been ordered to $upport her
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#224
As to emancipation, the Illinois Emancipation of Minors Act has the following sentence:
happyslug
Feb 2013
#234
A child cannot simply declare themselves emancipated and voila! Its done
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#236
Look at Section 2, the last sentence of the second paragraph, it reads as follows:
happyslug
Feb 2013
#237
Is she an emancipated minor? I hadn't seen that. Link? Otherwise they are responsible
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#49
Unless she's won a legal emancipation, they are still responsible for her legally
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#63
link she was not living with her parent now or at the time she became pregnant
azurnoir
Feb 2013
#62
Oh I agree. This case sucks but the parents are still legally responsible
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#66
The proof is the fact that she wasn't living with her parents and I'll tell you how I know.
notadmblnd
Feb 2013
#91
The thing is it's the daughter's choice, which means all the responsibilities of that choice
jeff47
Feb 2013
#69
I agree its unfair regardless of the law. And you put your finger right on the heart of the matter
riderinthestorm
Feb 2013
#218
If a woman can not support herself and her child(ren), the child(ren) should be fostered out or adop
uppityperson
Feb 2013
#75
I understand this is a minor, but was expanding on what you wrote, trying to clarify.
uppityperson
Feb 2013
#89
Good luck to that teen. I hope if she changes her mind or needs help later she can get help. Choice
uppityperson
Feb 2013
#77
The parents could have (should have?) petitioned to have her declared an "emancipated minor".
marybourg
Feb 2013
#79
1) "Roe" made this her choice. There can be no obligation for her to abort.
OmahaBlueDog
Feb 2013
#93
why didn't the court mandate any percentage of support from the baby's father??
Blue_Tires
Feb 2013
#102
actually, if I had my CHOICE, every school would begin in middle school to have a class in
wordpix
Feb 2013
#184
Curious about how the right wing will cover this. Basically, it means that no one can "punish" their
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2013
#125
It's her life & the baby's life. See how she deals with it.Could go either way.Her body / her choice
judesedit
Feb 2013
#126
Now the kid's a saint for saving her unborn baby.. (which is, of course, her choice)
mountain grammy
Feb 2013
#128
Anyone who thinks the parents should have the authority to force an abortion...
NaturalHigh
Feb 2013
#140
The bus service in Houston is horrible. You have to have a car to get anyplace
Manifestor_of_Light
Feb 2013
#174
But in two years, she won't be a teen. And her child will have a whole life ahead of her!
Pterodactyl
Feb 2013
#173
There is something wrong here, this was filed February 11 and the parents had 20 days to respond
happyslug
Feb 2013
#164
The fundies will pick up the tab, wait and see.. I can already see her in her own McMansion and with
secondwind
Feb 2013
#176