Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Powell's Chief of Staff: Iraq Intel Was 'Outright Lies', But Powell Didn't 'Knowingly Lie' at U.N. [View all]Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)51. Powell knew in his gut that there was a good chance the evidence bullshit
Wilkerson is right in the sense that Bush and Cheney didn't come to Powell and tell him, "We know for a fact that Saddam Hussein has no Weapons of Mass Destruction whatsoever and so we need you to go to the UN and lie about it."
But he knew that the evidence was sketchy and some of it was even obtained by torture. He still went to the UN and made the case for a war that was against his better judgment. No it's not an outright lie, but it's just as bad.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Powell's Chief of Staff: Iraq Intel Was 'Outright Lies', But Powell Didn't 'Knowingly Lie' at U.N. [View all]
BradBlog
Feb 2013
OP
So, the feds lied, and their media empire went along with all of the propoganda
blkmusclmachine
Feb 2013
#5
If you are part of an administration, that is your job. He was fed lies. The problem was the media
still_one
Feb 2013
#13
I believe Powell could easily have beaten Clinton had he chosen to run in 1992. He was just
Cal33
Feb 2013
#40