Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

9. No, went right over your head didn't it?

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #8)

Fri Mar 1, 2013, 03:07 PM

Mar 2013

It said based on "limited scientific knowledge".

IOW, they admit this situation is opening up all new fields of science and that further studies will be needed. Which means they are being honest. Which is quite refreshing.

Most of the self-claiming scientist we see here are claiming that they know everything already. Which exposes them to being anti-science.

Science, true science, never sleeps. Wake UP!

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Report: Infant Girls Exposed to Most-Contaminated Fukushima Area Face 70% Higher Risk Thyroid Cancer [View all] Hissyspit Feb 2013 OP

This ~ In_The_Wind Feb 2013 #1

In light of this how can nuclear energy be seen as safe? madokie Feb 2013 #2

Seriously? FBaggins Mar 2013 #6

NYT article had this to say RobertEarl Mar 2013 #7

So? They're saying the same thing I said. FBaggins Mar 2013 #8

No, went right over your head didn't it? RobertEarl Mar 2013 #9

Nope. It's just what I said (twice now). FBaggins Mar 2013 #10

There you go with the personal attacks RobertEarl Mar 2013 #12

Again... Nope. FBaggins Mar 2013 #16

You should go there and tell the people RobertEarl Mar 2013 #18

So you're really incapable of nuance, eh? FBaggins Mar 2013 #21

Facts RobertEarl Mar 2013 #22

heh zappaman Mar 2013 #19

almost doubling of her risk CreekDog Mar 2013 #11

With numbers that small... why be "horrified"? FBaggins Mar 2013 #13

a 1 in 133 risk turning into a 1 in 78 risk? CreekDog Mar 2013 #17

For someone in that category, yes. FBaggins Mar 2013 #20

Thanks for caring CreekDog RobertEarl Mar 2013 #15

On the plus side, if you're going to get cancer, thyroid is the one to get. Burma Jones Feb 2013 #3

tip of the iceberg, this is going to end in tears for so so many, and not just in Japan Mutatis Mutandis Feb 2013 #4

That is what I am afraid of RobertEarl Feb 2013 #5

On a tangent, but related... WilmywoodNCparalegal Mar 2013 #14

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Report: Infant Girls Expo...»Reply #9