Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(46,192 posts)

17. a 1 in 133 risk turning into a 1 in 78 risk?

Fri Mar 1, 2013, 04:48 PM

Mar 2013

it would take some pretty good talking points to make me think this is a good thing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This ~ In_The_Wind Feb 2013 #1

In light of this how can nuclear energy be seen as safe? madokie Feb 2013 #2

Seriously? FBaggins Mar 2013 #6

NYT article had this to say RobertEarl Mar 2013 #7

So? They're saying the same thing I said. FBaggins Mar 2013 #8

No, went right over your head didn't it? RobertEarl Mar 2013 #9

Nope. It's just what I said (twice now). FBaggins Mar 2013 #10

There you go with the personal attacks RobertEarl Mar 2013 #12

Again... Nope. FBaggins Mar 2013 #16

You should go there and tell the people RobertEarl Mar 2013 #18

So you're really incapable of nuance, eh? FBaggins Mar 2013 #21

Facts RobertEarl Mar 2013 #22

heh zappaman Mar 2013 #19

almost doubling of her risk CreekDog Mar 2013 #11

With numbers that small... why be "horrified"? FBaggins Mar 2013 #13

a 1 in 133 risk turning into a 1 in 78 risk? CreekDog Mar 2013 #17

For someone in that category, yes. FBaggins Mar 2013 #20

Thanks for caring CreekDog RobertEarl Mar 2013 #15

That is what I am afraid of RobertEarl Feb 2013 #5

On a tangent, but related... WilmywoodNCparalegal Mar 2013 #14