Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

David__77

(24,509 posts)

5. No, 71 thought it was too rich to support it. True that only 12 voted "no."

Reply to pampango (Reply #3)

Wed May 15, 2013, 03:32 PM

May 2013

I think that as time goes on, the number will drop. The logic of the civil is such that it is almost inevitable. It is not even a function of who is right or wrong...

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.N. General Assembly adopts resolution condemning Syrian president Assad's forces [View all] Hissyspit May 2013 OP

Aljazeera: UN condemns Syrian government for violence pampango May 2013 #1

Qatar authored the statement? That's rich. Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #2

Only 12 countries thought it was too "rich". 107 did not seem to mind. pampango May 2013 #3

No, 71 thought it was too rich to support it. True that only 12 voted "no." David__77 May 2013 #5

When it comes to human rights violations, the rebels are doing their best to catch up. Comrade Grumpy May 2013 #8

Which Syrian people are John2 May 2013 #7

Pushed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia eissa May 2013 #4

The important thing is that there are no sanctions against Syria. David__77 May 2013 #6