Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Guantánamo hunger strikers subject to harsh new method of force feeding [View all]sir pball
(5,346 posts)49. What's this "total immunity" of which you speak? "Sovereign Immunity" covers it, Constitutionally!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity_in_the_United_States
I won't ever argue that it's right, but unless the Feds say you can sue them, you simply CANNOT. Same goes for most governments worldwide...they all operate with total immunity. "It's good to be King!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity
In the United States, the federal government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. See Gray v. Bell, 712 F.2d 490, 507 (D.C. Cir. 1983). The United States has waived sovereign immunity to a limited extent, mainly through the Federal Tort Claims Act, which waives the immunity if a tortious act of a federal employee causes damage, and the Tucker Act, which waives the immunity over claims arising out of contracts to which the federal government is a party. The Federal Tort Claims Act and the Tucker Act are not as broad waivers of sovereign immunity as they might appear, as there are a number of statutory exceptions and judicially fashioned limiting doctrines applicable to both. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331 confers federal question jurisdiction on district courts, but this statute has been held not to be a blanket waiver of sovereign immunity on the part of the federal government.
I won't ever argue that it's right, but unless the Feds say you can sue them, you simply CANNOT. Same goes for most governments worldwide...they all operate with total immunity. "It's good to be King!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Guantánamo hunger strikers subject to harsh new method of force feeding [View all]
Judi Lynn
May 2013
OP
Pres Obama on start of 2nd term: 'You start thinking about history and a longer sweep of time"
dixiegrrrrl
May 2013
#4
What's this "total immunity" of which you speak? "Sovereign Immunity" covers it, Constitutionally!
sir pball
May 2013
#49
It's a combination of a standard prison restraining chair and an ambulance neck brace.
Sirveri
May 2013
#29
Question. Should the government then just let them commit suicide by starving themselves?
cstanleytech
May 2013
#15
Either you arent a US Citizen or if you are you failed a couple of classes in school.
cstanleytech
May 2013
#33
Hey I agree they should be tried or released, congress is the one that doesnt. nt
cstanleytech
May 2013
#27
It's the Rethugs fault...they're the ones who won't fund their release. Airline tickets cost money.
Auntie Bush
May 2013
#39
Actually it is their fault but I think its mainly that they are using the people held there
cstanleytech
May 2013
#40
More like I am wondering if anyone here has any other viable solutions keeping in mind things like
cstanleytech
May 2013
#26
Let them die with dignity, like Terry Schiavo. Many of them have already been "released"
riderinthestorm
May 2013
#45