Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
18. Not a valid question based on the answer you provided.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:18 AM
Jun 2013

The impeachment of Bush was discussed often for 7+ years here.
I can't think of single thread that I have read calling for Obama's impeachment.

And this "full support from many on the left" statement is just a RW talking point and not part of a fact based reality.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Link and story. flpoljunkie Jun 2013 #1
maybe the republicans shouldn't have brought this to the court.. madrchsod Jun 2013 #6
We can only hope their short-sightedness will be their petard. As usual. Myrina Jun 2013 #11
The DOJ brought this case to the court. former9thward Jun 2013 #21
did`t know that ..thanks madrchsod Jun 2013 #42
This will be interesting Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #2
What are we supposed to think on this one here at DU? geek tragedy Jun 2013 #3
They did NOTHING with the bush doing it, suddenly they find it important. I do believe they will still_one Jun 2013 #4
Apples and oranges. Igel Jun 2013 #19
What a big fat joke this one is BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #5
+1 Berlum Jun 2013 #13
I know, can you believe it?!? 100% of the time! OMG!!!11!!!1! Where will it end? n/t eggplant Jun 2013 #17
Once again, repugs solving problems that don't exist. louis-t Jun 2013 #52
I'm sure they've already gamed out how they'll appeal BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #57
Well he'd better get going quick at least give them something to crow about. Historic NY Jun 2013 #56
This won't be decided til June 2014 if I am not mistaken. graham4anything Jun 2013 #7
Obama is president until 2016 blackspade Jun 2013 #16
this is bullshit! ElsewheresDaughter Jun 2013 #8
How many appointments have the Republicans refused to vote on? Frustratedlady Jun 2013 #9
The repubs haven't just blocked democratic appointments. They are trying to nullify the powers of okaawhatever Jun 2013 #29
Thanks. I've lost track. Frustratedlady Jun 2013 #34
It's going to get slapped down davidpdx Jun 2013 #10
How many DUers are hoping for Obama's impeachment? Democat Jun 2013 #12
The answer to that question is easy to calculate Android3.14 Jun 2013 #15
That sounds about right davidpdx Jun 2013 #26
I've seen many more than that. Zoeisright Jun 2013 #47
Not a valid question based on the answer you provided. blackspade Jun 2013 #18
I have seen such a comment in a post saying that davidpdx Jun 2013 #25
But they can't impeach him for drones or spying on citizens. aquart Jun 2013 #27
Not just further to the right, Politicalboi Jun 2013 #45
Impeachment would be a very unwise move on their part. roamer65 Jun 2013 #39
Just like they paid for it in 2000? Angleae Jun 2013 #63
Fake Recess is same as Fake Filibuster bucolic_frolic Jun 2013 #14
Is the Supreme Court Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #20
The language you cite in Bush v. Gore does not exist. former9thward Jun 2013 #23
How many?? aquart Jun 2013 #28
How many? former9thward Jun 2013 #30
Actually Android3.14 Jun 2013 #33
It is myth and it does not mean at all what the poster said. former9thward Jun 2013 #35
Wow Android3.14 Jun 2013 #36
Wow.... former9thward Jun 2013 #38
Does this actually work for you? Android3.14 Jun 2013 #44
I asked a specific question. former9thward Jun 2013 #51
Okay, I'm backing away here Android3.14 Jun 2013 #59
The exact statement does limit the use csziggy Jun 2013 #40
All Supreme court decisions have "limiting statements" in them somewhere. former9thward Jun 2013 #41
Do they actually say "limiting statements" Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #43
I know what you said. former9thward Jun 2013 #49
I know what you said Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #62
Partisanship aside, I think the power of the Executive Branch is too great. Hosnon Jun 2013 #22
I do not think the executive power is too great. I think Congress's ability to thwart process Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #32
Exactly. Zoeisright Jun 2013 #48
I disagree that the Executive Branch is the weakest. Hosnon Jun 2013 #50
O.K., let's agree to disagree, but the Constitution doesn't give the president that much power Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #54
I agree Congress was intended to be the strongest, but that didn't happen in practice. Hosnon Jun 2013 #55
Again, if you and I agree that Congress has the greatest constitutional powers, then... Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #58
We don't agree to that. Supreme Court rulings Hosnon Jun 2013 #60
Then, you should take issue with how the SCOTUS interprets the law, right? The president doesn't Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #61
mute point..... rtracey Jun 2013 #24
it's moot shanti Jun 2013 #53
"Dumbya," Pappy Bush, Clinton and presidents before Obama made recess appointments. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #31
Sounds like the whiny scum sucking Rethuglicans ran to the court... roamer65 Jun 2013 #37
the RCons obstruct appts.& when no one's heading a certain dept., they complain O is doing a bad job wordpix Jun 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: 9:37 A.M. E.T. ...»Reply #18