BREAKING: 9:37 A.M. E.T. SUPREME COURT WILL DECIDE ON PRESIDENT'S POWER TO MAKE RECESS APPOINTMENTS

[Android3.14]

36. Wow

That didn't take long to descend to a petulant "is not-Is so" level. Are you twelve?
I show you an actual quote from a publication written by an actual member of the Supreme Court that backs up what the guy said, along with a link by a law professor lamenting the same thing, and this is your rebuttal?
Listen, kid, you match my Supreme Court justice and UCLA professor, and we'll call this a draw, at best. At this point, your ignorance is the fail.
But I'll tell you what. Why don't you just find a site as reputable as a UCLA publication (Snopes anyone?) that says the precedent issue is an internet hoax, and I'll give your missive the thought that it yet has shown it deserves.
Heck, I dare you to even do a search using the terms bush, gore, court, precedent and hoax, and see if that brings you squat.
Sheesh.