Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Swedish professor nominates Edward Snowden for the Nobel Peace Prize... [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)46. Has he followed this up with significant reductions since?
In fact, were any reductions made then? How many other people worked on nuclear disarmament besides Obama? Whatever was done was not done under the Bush Administration, who took us out of the ABM Treaty.
Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. . .
I'm sorry, to me that sounds like a thank you for defeating the Republicans in 2008. The opposites of those, unilateralism-- eschewing the UN and other international institutions-- and resorting to force rather than dialog, those were all policies of the Bush Administration.
Moreover, they can't be thanking him for nuclear reduction, because there definitely wasn't any. I'm certain he mentioned a nuclear-free world, but they definitely didn't list his achievements in nuclear reduction after that sentence. Was he given the prize for his sentiments?
No, I think the prize was awarded on hopes and best expectations. And the thanks turned out to be premature.
I'd call his accomplishments on nuclear arms modest, but I grade on a curve there, because the Bush Administration's actions left it in such a mess, it's almost impossible to put the genie back in the bottle.
It was great of him to give the prize to charity, (I am curious as to which ones) but like the Bush's, the Kennedy's, and the Clintons, the Obamas are never going to be short of money now. He does know what lower and middle class people know: that above a certain amount of money, it doesn't matter how much you have.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Swedish professor nominates Edward Snowden for the Nobel Peace Prize... [View all]
Indi Guy
Jul 2013
OP
I think Obama's was more a thank you to America for safely removing Bush from office
yurbud
Jul 2013
#34
I was thinking yesterday about how heads were going to explode if this should happen.
Waiting For Everyman
Jul 2013
#3
What has Edward performed in promoting peace, absolutely nothing. He is not on he is not even
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#11
Surveillance will continue so what has Snowden done in his life to promote peace, sure wasn't
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#19
Are you referring to the belief the right to life? If you have a terrorist to blow you up it will
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#30
The biggest propaganda is coming from those backing Snowden and the cause, I don't fall for their
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#61
We do not share the same opinion. If you looked at your phone bill can you tell what the
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#81
now that would be a wonderful way to focus attention on the Surveillance State
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2013
#15
Actually, getting NOMINATED for a Nobel Peace Prize isn't really all that impressive
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#24
Aren't you more concerned with the anti-Americanism clearly demonstrated by the NSA at home...
Indi Guy
Jul 2013
#49