Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
65. Welfare for Wall Street. But no money for Main Street.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 08:20 PM
Jul 2013

That's how you know that DC, and it's so-called "two-Party" System, has been completely captured by and whores itself out to Big Money, and it is completely outside our ability to influence or control.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's not "almost like" - it IS "welfare for the wealthy" polichick Jul 2013 #1
Wish I could have said it as well, for it is indeed sociopathy on raging 'roids indepat Jul 2013 #4
Absolutely agree! Owl Jul 2013 #5
Schieffer always is careful not to stomp too hard on the 1% while pretending he cares. liberal N proud Jul 2013 #38
Why do we need ANY subsidies for the farming corporations? BlueStreak Jul 2013 #51
Same reason we have subsidies for big oil... polichick Jul 2013 #59
The oil subsidies are relatively small, I think. BlueStreak Jul 2013 #61
I'm glad somebody asked this question perdita9 Jul 2013 #2
Bob Schieffer is old school. He asks questions that matter. Faygo Kid Jul 2013 #3
But do you remember when Schieffer dissed Snowden? alp227 Jul 2013 #10
And yet he's acting surprised at "welfare for the wealthy." Orsino Jul 2013 #60
GOP, party for welfare of corporations, for forced births and make damn sure the children starve, Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #6
I've never understood why they won't allow birth control. Frustratedlady Jul 2013 #7
"I've never understood why they won't allow birth control." hopemountain Jul 2013 #17
Agreed, we have to get our grassroots campaigns at full speed and get this crazy bunch out. The Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #19
"voting against themselves" hopemountain Jul 2013 #21
Let me see if I can explain, poor people are voting for politicians who have no interest in Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #22
yes! i have family who think & do exactly this very thing hopemountain Jul 2013 #25
I deal with many family members like that and even some who thought they knew so much as to get Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #27
right on. i use du and msnbc for the same hopemountain Jul 2013 #31
Because it isn't really about abortion, truebluegreen Jul 2013 #30
Eric Cantor (Rat-VA) Hubert Flottz Jul 2013 #8
mean spirited little bastard Va Lefty Jul 2013 #37
That's what he is. Exactly. Enthusiast Jul 2013 #49
I feel your pain Lefty. Hubert Flottz Jul 2013 #50
And these huge subsidies for agri-corporations are so damaging to farmers in poor countries. n/t pampango Jul 2013 #9
He wants to know why 1 in 6 are receiving food benefits? Asshole! Look in the mirror! CurtEastPoint Jul 2013 #11
Welfare for Big Agribusiness including Members of Congress stuffmatters Jul 2013 #12
Conflict of Interest??? kracer20 Jul 2013 #26
numerous Congresspeople hold stocks in agri-corporations wordpix Jul 2013 #52
Well thats a shocker Iliyah Jul 2013 #13
Eric Cantor.... TinkerTot55 Jul 2013 #14
"in future legislation".... Marie Marie Jul 2013 #40
you beat me to it.... yonder Jul 2013 #46
Pass SNAP and dump the Farm Bill. Owl Jul 2013 #15
YES YES YES Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #20
Republicans greazing the skids Berlum Jul 2013 #16
... hopemountain Jul 2013 #18
The farm bill has been welfare for wealthy agro-business for the past 30 years. Dawson Leery Jul 2013 #23
Eric Cantor is going to introduce a separate bill funding SNAP? Jack Rabbit Jul 2013 #24
Great question Bob, good on ya ! Now KEEP doing that with Republicans !!!! nt steve2470 Jul 2013 #28
I predict Schieffer will be forced to apologize within 48 hours. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #29
Hope he says something like, "Sorry I strayed from the corporate press release." SunSeeker Jul 2013 #35
Like that? question everything Jul 2013 #32
It's not Welfare for the Wealthy DWinNJ Jul 2013 #33
Thank you for showing a bit of journalism, Bob Schieffer. nt SunSeeker Jul 2013 #34
Increase food stamp benefits and cut junk food out of it. ErikJ Jul 2013 #36
I don't know anyone... davidthegnome Jul 2013 #67
Junk food is anything high in salt, fat and/or sugar. ErikJ Jul 2013 #68
So Rep Kelly, if that is true, why wouldn't the House take up food for the needy FIRST? AllyCat Jul 2013 #39
I'm a farmer and can't think that I've ever heard of, or discussed with another farmer, toby jo Jul 2013 #41
Farmers Took A While Treant Jul 2013 #58
Same here. JoeyT Jul 2013 #66
Subsidies my ass, fat checks to a few large corporations. Problem going on for far too long too. Coyotl Jul 2013 #42
Kelly is a lying sack of shit. blackspade Jul 2013 #43
Riceland Foods got $110,000,000 in 2002, more than 11 states combined. Coyotl Jul 2013 #44
Overhauling the Farm Bill: The Real Beneficiaries of Subsidies Coyotl Jul 2013 #45
future legislation rpannier Jul 2013 #47
Yeah. They'll fund food stamps in future legislation. Enthusiast Jul 2013 #48
I figured it was Cantor atreides1 Jul 2013 #53
SNAP is also welfare for the wealthy Jesus Malverde Jul 2013 #54
grrrrrr. mountain grammy Jul 2013 #63
Big corn, big oil, the defense industry. The welfare queen trio that sucks up about 70% of our taxes marble falls Jul 2013 #55
SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM! SOCIALISM! Festivito Jul 2013 #56
Bwahahahahaha! Lemme clean this one up for 'ya.... Grins Jul 2013 #57
“I’m not a politician, I’m an automobile dealer" liberaltrucker Jul 2013 #62
Wow, golly gee whiz, "it's almost like welfare for the wealthy. mountain grammy Jul 2013 #64
Welfare for Wall Street. But no money for Main Street. blkmusclmachine Jul 2013 #65
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CBS host confronts Republ...»Reply #65