Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: France veil row sparks Trappes unrest [View all]Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)--from the one stated by the post I answered. The post I answered stated that the law was to stop harm to women and removing veils would do that. THAT is what I responded to. Your argument is addressed by me here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=544102
And even if the family has made the rather stupid decision to move to a place where the law won't let this woman wear her veil, removing that veil should still be done with delicacy. This is not the same as her breaking the law by driving while drunk (i.e. she is an immediate danger to others). This is her doing what she always does given her culture, etc. Ripping away the veil then and there will hardly make the law (or the country that passed that law) seem more reasonable or rational. Remember as well that many of these women wearing veils moved to France BEFORE the law was passed, so we can't say for sure that she emigrated to this place knowing the law. If a law passed tomorrow that women where you live couldn't wear bras, not every woman would immediately go bra-less. Those uncomfortable with that would probably keep wearing bras up until they got stopped by the police about it.
That there is a law against it doesn't mean that women uncomfortable with showing their faces (and or women pressured by men not to show their faces) will immediately obey that law.