Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: France veil row sparks Trappes unrest [View all]Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...female circumcision (or male come to that) isn't the same as a cultural or religious "uniform" worn by a certain group. We outlaw female circumcision--and should outlaw male--because it involves unnecessary mutilation of a child that can't be reversed. We would say that this sort of decision should be made by an informed adult, of their own free will. As for sacrificing animals--that's cruelty to animals and we don't allow that.
If we're going to compare Apples and Apples, shouldn't we compare this veil to other cultural/religious uniforms? Turbans and white outfits worn by certain Sikhs, yarmulkes and prayer shawls for orthodox Jews (or just the fact that orthodox jewish women cover their hair and arms and wear longish skirts?), Amish clothing, etc. These are all cultural uniforms (which might or might not have their basis in the religion). These are not outlawed by us (or by France come to that). Why not? Because they don't harm the wearer or those around him/her--it doesn't even harm their children who might have to wear them as kids of that family, but then could decide to give up wearing them as adults.
Why is the veil different? If the woman wants to wear it, but the law won't let her, then we have to ask--how is this veil harmful to the country? To others? What are we protecting people from? Especially given that she is not breaking the modesty laws of that culture, only keeping to her own.