Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama to Propose Eliminating Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac [View all]SunSeeker
(58,240 posts)14. Thanks for the link. Looks like the point is to prevent future bank bailouts.
From the article:
The president strongly supports comprehensive housing finance reform that would forever end Fannie Mae and Freddie Macs flawed business model that put the American taxpayers on the hook, Brundage said in an e-mail.
Under the bill, Washington-based Fannie Mae and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac, which package mortgages into securities on which they guarantee 100 percent payment of principal and interest, would be liquidated within five years.
Because the bill would force banks to share the losses from bad mortgages, taxpayers will know that in the future we wont have a system where theres private gains and public losses, Corker said in the Bloomberg Television interview.
The bill calls for private financiers to hold equity capital of 10 percent of the principal of underlying securities to cover any first loss of the loans. Housing finance participants have been critical of that first-loss provision, as it is referred to in the bill, saying it is too big a change from the current system.
Under the bill, Washington-based Fannie Mae and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac, which package mortgages into securities on which they guarantee 100 percent payment of principal and interest, would be liquidated within five years.
Because the bill would force banks to share the losses from bad mortgages, taxpayers will know that in the future we wont have a system where theres private gains and public losses, Corker said in the Bloomberg Television interview.
The bill calls for private financiers to hold equity capital of 10 percent of the principal of underlying securities to cover any first loss of the loans. Housing finance participants have been critical of that first-loss provision, as it is referred to in the bill, saying it is too big a change from the current system.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thanks for the link. Looks like the point is to prevent future bank bailouts.
SunSeeker
Aug 2013
#14
I wonder how incredibly ignorant people still are about this? The right-wing spin machine worked
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#2
I'm expect some chewing, but I no longer care. Fannie and Freddie weren't blameless, especially when
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#4
Not to mention the inconsistency of this compared to what he proposed for student loans. The
jwirr
Aug 2013
#20
Once again Obama proposes stealing from poor and middle class to give to the rich
bowens43
Aug 2013
#8
Still I wish he could work on breaking up the banks themselves into smaller ones but I
cstanleytech
Aug 2013
#24
Chelsea didn't need no stinkin Fannie Mae to buy her $10.5 million Manhattan "apartment".
Divernan
Aug 2013
#10
I honestly dont mind them buying such a house, I would do it if I could afford it.
cstanleytech
Aug 2013
#25
Why on earth would 2 adults need 6 and 1/2 bathrooms in a one story apartment?
Divernan
Aug 2013
#40
Just how typical is it for a 30-something couple to spend $10 mil on a Manhattan apt?
Divernan
Aug 2013
#56
No, for-profits previously originated AND serviced student loans. Now only nonprofits service loans.
SunSeeker
Aug 2013
#49
" new Glass-Steagall act breaks up the "too big to fail" banks." I really wish they would do that.
cstanleytech
Aug 2013
#26
What makes me maddest though is the government bailed them out but the government
cstanleytech
Aug 2013
#58
Are there any party favors from the big collapse party? Oh, here, look what's left!
Safetykitten
Aug 2013
#34
I imagine the assets (homes) owned by those two would go to Wall Street.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#64